Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 08:58 PM May 2016

Court reinstates lawsuits alleging collusion by big banks

Source: Associated Press

Court reinstates lawsuits alleging collusion by big banks

Updated 6:47 pm, Monday, May 23, 2016

NEW YORK (AP) — Lawsuits against 16 of the world's largest banks alleging they colluded to manipulate the primary benchmark for global short-term interest rates have been reinstated by a federal appeals court that found Monday that a judge had rejected the litigation too quickly.

Saying it wasn't a close call, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan restored lawsuits seeking billions of dollars in damages brought by investors in financial instruments mostly issued by the banks. The financial instruments carried interest rates tied to the London Interbank Offered Rate known as LIBOR. LIBOR is used by banks to borrow from each other and affects trillions of dollars in contracts around the world, including mortgages, bonds and consumer loans.

The lawsuits in Manhattan federal court had been dismissed by a judge who reasoned that the LIBOR-rate setting process was collaborative rather than competitive. The judge also found any manipulation of the rates did not cause investors anticompetitive harm.

But the appeals court said in a ruling written by Circuit Judge Dennis Jacobs that the lawsuits were dismissed at such an early stage that the plaintiffs did not yet have a chance to try to prove that the banks used LIBOR in setting rates for lending transactions. The 2nd Circuit said that and other questions could only be "properly analyzed" at a later stage in the litigation.



Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Court-reinstates-lawsuits-alleging-rate-collusion-7940917.php

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
1. Did it cause competative harm, just not anticompetitive harm? Yikes!
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:41 PM
May 2016

Judgement seems a labor of literally laughable LIBOR.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
7. But, that product, your choice within competition. So you were not anticompetatively harmed - right?
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:35 PM
May 2016

Or, "and" you were not anticompetatively harmed.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
2. The deadlocked SCOTUS is having all kinds of effects. Any win in a lower court
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:00 PM
May 2016

will have to stand because the SCOTUS will be unable to overturn it. Meaning that if the banksters lose in the appellate court, they are toast.

 

scottie55

(1,400 posts)
3. It Is Simple Theft Any 1st Year Law School Dropout Could Successfully Prosecute
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:37 PM
May 2016

But they are bankers.

They break the law, pay a fine, and buy bigger houses in the Hamptons.

If they were black, or poor, they would be doing 10 years.

We all know how the game is played.

Justice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
6. LIBOR is a rate used in offering memos, isn't it? Thus,
Tue May 24, 2016, 04:44 PM
May 2016

pension funds, for example, would be in a position to claim to be victims of theft?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court reinstates lawsuits...