Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:41 PM Jun 2012

U2 guitarist may get a second chance at Malibu mansions

Source: Los Angeles Times

SACRAMENTO — The California Coastal Commission rejected a controversial proposal last year by U2 guitarist the Edge to build five mansions on a scenic bluff above Malibu, saying that it would scar a rugged ridgeline and harm sensitive habitat.

Now, some of the same powerful lobbyists and lawyers behind the musician's quashed development are working the halls of the Capitol to push a bill that could give the rock star another chance at his dream compound.

..................................................

Developers at times try to skirt the issue by claiming each homesite has a different owner. They shield the identities through formation of limited liability corporations.

In the case of the Edge, whose real name is David Evans, the agency denied his plans because it said he was attempting to bypass environmental rules and maximize development by submitting five separate applications, each under a different corporate name.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guitarist-coast-20120616,0,5900611.story



This really reflects upon the ethics of The Edge, or lack thereof.

I expected much better from U2.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U2 guitarist may get a second chance at Malibu mansions (Original Post) kwassa Jun 2012 OP
Let's hope Mother Nature Politicalboi Jun 2012 #1
Just another reason to hate that wool-hatted twit Tom Ripley Jun 2012 #2
Never fear, he will just carbon credit his footprint... Earth_First Jun 2012 #3
I lived in Malibu . . . Richard D Jun 2012 #4
If you paid attention. sendero Jun 2012 #5
U2 has to be one of the biggest frauds in the music industry Bjorn Against Jun 2012 #6
Kick, for Roger Waters and David Gilmour. Drum Jun 2012 #15
+infinity. Another sucky 80s band Ishoutandscream2 Jun 2012 #19
U2 sucks, their music sucks, and I hate Bono's stupid glasses. LeftyMom Jun 2012 #7
There's undeveloped land in Malibu? bluedigger Jun 2012 #8
Malibu covers a large area ... kwassa Jun 2012 #9
I've never been to SoCal. bluedigger Jun 2012 #13
I used to think that too waddirum Jun 2012 #23
The mudslides can be really devastating. Especially after fire season. calimary Jun 2012 #26
They have their problems, but the California Coastal Commission has been a godsend RufusTFirefly Jun 2012 #10
Sure, lots of it. Every rich asshole that moves in goes to work trying to stop the Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #18
Now that makes perfect sense. bluedigger Jun 2012 #21
I wish it were at least an exaggeration, but that's what goes on all the time. Egalitarian Thug Jun 2012 #22
All the more reason to support this japple Jun 2012 #11
why do rich people need to do these things ? JI7 Jun 2012 #12
Human nature? Puzzledtraveller Jun 2012 #17
It all makes sense SHRED Jun 2012 #14
Isn't there some coast line xxqqqzme Jun 2012 #16
Bwaaah! Liberal_in_LA Jun 2012 #20
It's a stupid place to build anything Marrah_G Jun 2012 #24
U2 is an absolute embarrassment. The Stranger Jun 2012 #25

Richard D

(8,754 posts)
4. I lived in Malibu . . .
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 09:58 PM
Jun 2012

. . . many years ago, before it was "The Malibu". So sad to see people with too much money ruin such a beautiful place on this planet.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
5. If you paid attention.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:00 PM
Jun 2012

.... you would not expect better of "U2", especially Bono.

He's a fucking fraud.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
6. U2 has to be one of the biggest frauds in the music industry
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:07 PM
Jun 2012

I like some of U2's music, a few of their songs even approach the level of greatness. While I think their musical abilities are highly overrated, they are certainly not bad musically. As people though they are complete frauds, acting as spokespeople for the poor while simultaneously doing everything they can to make themselves look superior to the people they set out for photo ops with. Don't get me wrong they have done some good things, but they do plenty of harm as well. Roger Waters and David Gilmour have also done a lot of really great things and given huge amounts of money to charity and don't suck up to the right-wing while they do it, their music is also a hell of a lot better than U2. Their work may not grab the headlines like Bono's does, but it has been far more admirable.

Ishoutandscream2

(6,662 posts)
19. +infinity. Another sucky 80s band
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:18 PM
Jun 2012

U2 - pretentious frauds, and every damn song sounds the same. And amen to Waters and Gilmore - hell, I believe Waters' own mother was a registered socialist.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
7. U2 sucks, their music sucks, and I hate Bono's stupid glasses.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:20 PM
Jun 2012

On the other hand, I think the other douchecanoes who live in Malibu deserve them. Somebody approve the guitarist with a stage name so stupid I can't bear to type it, on the condition that he builds next to Mel Gibson's spread. I'll make popcorn.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
9. Malibu covers a large area ...
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 10:50 PM
Jun 2012

and people head up higher and higher into those fire-prone hills .....

not to mention mudslides and earthquakes.

edit to add:

The Malibu coastline is 27 miles long. I just looked it up.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
13. I've never been to SoCal.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:46 PM
Jun 2012

I just have an impression of unlimited urban sprawl, which doesn't attract me. Good to know there's some space left.

waddirum

(979 posts)
23. I used to think that too
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:43 PM
Jun 2012

I finally went to LA for the first time at age 42. I was quite surprised how beautiful it is. There is a considerable amount of open space and undeveloped land, within LA city limits.

I also had this vision of unlimited urban sprawl, but was pleased to find lots of nice hikes and open space.

calimary

(81,267 posts)
26. The mudslides can be really devastating. Especially after fire season.
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:13 PM
Jun 2012

A lot of that terrain in upper Malibu is almost unreachable, so when there are brushfires, it's just really shitty.

What the fuck does this dude need five mansions for? It's funny - their public image doesn't suggest living so lavishly, in such obscene opulence. I've always had issues with celebrities, especially rock stars, who "title" themselves with these pretentious names. What's so wrong with the name yer mama gave you? Oooooh, Mr. Edge. Ooooooh. I'm impressed.





NOT.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
10. They have their problems, but the California Coastal Commission has been a godsend
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:30 PM
Jun 2012

Visitors from other parts of the country who come to visit me on the California coast are often amazed at how relatively undeveloped things are. Given the growing trend toward rapacious privatization and so-called "austerity measures," I don't know how much longer our coastline will survive.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
18. Sure, lots of it. Every rich asshole that moves in goes to work trying to stop the
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 07:14 PM
Jun 2012

next rich asshole from being able to move in.

That is when they're not begging the state for emergency funds to rebuild their mansions at taxpayer expense when the ocean washes them out to sea.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
22. I wish it were at least an exaggeration, but that's what goes on all the time.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 08:54 PM
Jun 2012

I've lost count of the suits/counter-suits of Mel Gibson alone. OTOH, it is a pretty entertaining diversion for those of us outside looking in.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
12. why do rich people need to do these things ?
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jun 2012

if i was wealthy i would travel around the world. maybe even buy a small home in various places. why the need to have these huge things, especially when it could hurt the land ?

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
17. Human nature?
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:41 AM
Jun 2012

If you were made a multi-millionaire today, do you think it would change who you are, over time? Rhetorical question, not an accusation.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U2 guitarist may get a se...