Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,658 posts)
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 09:32 PM Jul 2016

NLRB Confirms Legality of Union Support for Israel Boycott; Union Condemns Political Attacks on BDS

Source: UE Union

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has reaffirmed its dismissal an unfair labor practice charge brought by an Israeli law firm against a U.S. union, the United Electrical Workers, over its support of protests against Israeli policies including the union’s endorsement of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement (BDS) movement.

At its national convention in Baltimore August 16-20, 2015, the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) adopted a resolution endorsing the BDS movement to pressure Israel to negotiate peace with the Palestinians and end the occupation. UE is the first national U.S. union to endorse BDS. Read the resolution here.

On October 23, the Israeli law firm Shurat Hadin filed a charge with the NLRB alleging that UE’s resolution violated the prohibition in U.S. labor law against “secondary boycotts.” The union disputed the charge, arguing that Shurat Hadin’s action was an attempt to interfere with the First Amendment rights of the union and its members to express opinions on political and international issues, and also that the Israeli firm’s allegation were factually untrue. On January 12, Region 6 of the NLRB dismissed the charge. Shurat HaDin then appealed to the Office of the General Counsel of the NLRB, and on May 26 that office denied the appeal.

UE National President Peter Knowlton says the union “welcomes the labor board’s decision” to reject, for a second time, Shurat Hadin’s charge. He said that UE in the past had “withstood attempts by the U.S. government to silence us during the McCarthy era in the 1950s,” and was “unbowed by the latest attempt of a surrogate of the Israeli government to stifle our call for justice for Palestinian and Israeli workers.” Knowlton added, “The NLRB’s decision is a victory for the growing BDS movement across the U.S., which faces increasing political attempts to silence and intimidate critics of the Israeli government. As Americans who have a constitutional right to criticize our own government, we certainly have a right to criticize and, if we choose, boycott a foreign government that is heavily subsidized by U.S. taxpayers.”

FULL story at link. The NLRB


Delegates to UE's 74th National Convention in August 2015 adopted a resolution on peace and justice for the peoples of Palestine and Israel, which has been unsuccessfully attacked by an Israeli law firm.

Read more: http://www.ueunion.org/political-action/2016/nlrb-confirms-legality-of-union-support-for-israel-boycott-union-condemns

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NLRB Confirms Legality of Union Support for Israel Boycott; Union Condemns Political Attacks on BDS (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jul 2016 OP
Thanks. I will never hire a UE electrician. 6chars Jul 2016 #1
It is a free country PatSeg Jul 2016 #2
Agree with that! 6chars Jul 2016 #3
Good. Mc Mike Jul 2016 #4
Go Unions. 6chars Jul 2016 #5
I've been following a lot of the Israel/Palestine issues fairly closely, for quite a few years. Mc Mike Jul 2016 #6
BDS is not at all about a 2-state solution 6chars Jul 2016 #7
I didn't claim to speak FOR J street and NIF, but I get and study their take on the issues regularly Mc Mike Jul 2016 #10
I would stand with the UE any day. And Israel can go take a flying leap. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2016 #9
I was supporting a CWA rally/picket during the last Verizon strike. Mc Mike Jul 2016 #11
It's good to see that the US constitution is still working. Little Tich Jul 2016 #8

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
4. Good.
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 10:06 PM
Jul 2016

Your first sub post-er has it wrong. UE doesn't wire houses, the IBEW does. That poster would probably go non-union, anyhow.

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
6. I've been following a lot of the Israel/Palestine issues fairly closely, for quite a few years.
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 10:33 PM
Jul 2016

I back J Street, NIF, the 2 State solution. Rabin was right, and Amir 'the lone nut' was intimately involved with Israel's far right, and Netanyahu and Likud can go pound sand.

The NLRB decision is correct. Foreign governments have no standing to try to enforce their will on American workers and American unions, even a close ally that is temporarily being run by scumbags.

UE wires electronic equipment, radios, machines, not homes. That's IBEW, or non-union electricians. My union rarely gets into wiring individual houses, we're less able to cut rates than non-union outfits are. There are plenty of good non-union inside wire people, though.

The IBEW hasn't weighed in on BDS, but as a rank and file member, I back it. Good call from the NLRB. I'm glad the repugs weren't able to torpedo it for Prez Obama's entire 2 terms in office. And it was really nice of Netanyahu to try to interfere in our '12 prez election, on behalf of the repugs. Much appreciated.

6chars

(3,967 posts)
7. BDS is not at all about a 2-state solution
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 10:44 PM
Jul 2016

jstreet and nif don't support bds

http://jstreet.org/policy/pages/boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-bds

http://www.nif.org/about/selected-policies/#14

Rabin's political heirs don't support BDS.

Unions are critically important for helping people who work have decent lives in our economy. Otherwise, owners (who are basically unions of capitalists) have an unfair advantage and take everything. But that doesn't mean I would support unions desire to keep certain minorities out, for example.

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
10. I didn't claim to speak FOR J street and NIF, but I get and study their take on the issues regularly
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 08:41 AM
Jul 2016

It would be a mistake for you to claim that I mischaracterized their position on BDS. And I back the 2 State solution, like they do. How to get there is the issue, but no solution will come from the current hard right junta. I'd like to see Ben-Ami, Beinert, Blumenthal, and Krugman have a free-wheeling forum on Pro-Israel, Pro-Peace, BDS, and the 2 State solution. (Not trying to be sexist in my choice of those 4 guys, I've just seen interactions between all of those people who I find to be admirable thinkers in sets of two on the issues, where they disagreed tactically with each other.)

With more illegal settlement building by the current 'zealous' Israeli leaders, I definitely will refuse to buy products from those settlements, because I'm not helping subsidize this crazy exercise in making more enemies who have legit gripes. A boycott is a good union move, a good civil rights move, and is effective. And I'll lobby for divestment and sanctions to help make the rock headed hard liners see the error of their ways because, as an ally that wants our equipment and logistical backing, they sure do seem to have gone broken arrow on us.

And I would never wish harm to Rabin's political heirs, but I'll do what I think is right, as I know they do. There is no litmus test for correct thought on our side, there just is one on the right wing's side. J Street and NIF are a welcome answer to AIPAC for me, AIPAC has disgusted me with their support for crazy apocalyptic fundy 'christian' US pols. But I never signed on to agree lockstep with them on tactics and advocacy.

And there is racism in US unions, some rank and file, some institutional. You're right, there. Their membership should be reflective of the population demographics of the labor markets they represent, and more should be done to include women equally, as well.

On edit, I do appreciate your 2 links. Point 3 of J Street's amplifies the kind of BDS they do support. And so does NIF in the 4th sentence of their #14 policy position statement. It's the difference between global(general) BDS with some anti-semitic elements who I don't want to be involved with, and BDS against the illegal settlements.

Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
11. I was supporting a CWA rally/picket during the last Verizon strike.
Sat Jul 23, 2016, 09:16 AM
Jul 2016

The CWAs and their associated IBEWs (not my local) were wearing red shirts, collar instead of Ts and Verizon management sent this big beefy guy wearing a red collar shirt into the crowd. Due to his camoflage I didn't know he wasn't some rank and filer at first, then he started talking to me, and he was pushing right wing crap on every issue we discussed. Finally we got around to Israel and he started badmouthing the country. I already knew where he was coming from by then, but I tested my theory out by saying 'You mean you're mad about what's happening to the Palestinians', which momentarily confused him, but he then said he didn't give a s**t about them. He just hated Israel. He hated Jews. He was a bircher, and was working for management to threaten the unions. So I just said to him 'Oh, you're anti-semitic. Well, this is America, you're free to talk about your beliefs if you want.' He started gibbering, gesticulating and yelling, not saying that he was upset about being called anti semitic, or saying he wasn't against Jewish people,just yelling that it WAS his right to say what he wanted. He wandered off yelling into the demonstrators, just trying to sew some fear into the union people, who had quite a large number of physically fit rank and filers among them, and weren't afraid at all. I just went back to facing the traffic with my sign, helping chant when the CWAs started chanting, cheering when pro-union people gave frequent horn honks of support.

Too bad for him that his corporate masters just recently lost their fight.

I think you can like Israel, Palestinians, and unions. None of them are mutually exclusive.

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
8. It's good to see that the US constitution is still working.
Fri Jul 22, 2016, 11:14 PM
Jul 2016

The anti-BDS laws that have been passed in several states won't stand up to a legal challenge. Besides, the only function of these laws is to protect the settlements from criticism. All these anti-BDS laws define the territories occupied by Israel as part of Israel.

If some people don't want to promote the settlements or the treatment of the occupied population, they should be allowed to do so.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NLRB Confirms Legality of...