Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 03:50 PM Jun 2012

WashPost will not retract 'outsourcing' story

Source: Politico

WashPost will not retract 'outsourcing' story

By DYLAN BYERS | 6/27/12 3:33 PM EDT

The Washington Post will not retract their June 21 report about Bain Capital's investments in firms that specialized in outsourcing American jobs, POLITICO has learned.

"We are very confident in our reporting," Washington Post spokesperson Kris Coratti told POLITICO following a meeting between the Post's executive editor Marcus Brauchli and Mitt Romney campaign representatives, who had sought a retraction from the paper.

The Romney campaign would not discuss the meeting. "It was an off the record private meeting so I don’t have anything for you on that," campaign press secretary Andrea Saul told POLITICO.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/06/washpost-will-not-redact-outsourcing-story-127466.html

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WashPost will not retract 'outsourcing' story (Original Post) flpoljunkie Jun 2012 OP
Thank God bluestateguy Jun 2012 #1
In a related story, Bain to buy WaPo send jobs to China rurallib Jun 2012 #2
ha otherone Jun 2012 #20
K and R Kingofalldems Jun 2012 #3
K&R SunsetDreams Jun 2012 #4
Just makes it even worse for Rmoney.. DCBob Jun 2012 #5
They were hoping to relive the 2004 fiasco with the Killian documents/AWOL Bush, etc. bluestateguy Jun 2012 #6
I'm shocked! Joe Bacon Jun 2012 #7
Me, too. Be still my heart! My BP has been too high all day long. freshwest Jun 2012 #24
"It was an off the record private "meeting"meaning arm twisting and threats leftyohiolib Jun 2012 #8
+1! Bozita Jun 2012 #9
and mentions of hair-cutting, no doubt n/t HillWilliam Jun 2012 #33
K&R and Shared. patrice Jun 2012 #10
Censorship, used to keep the ignorant, ignorant. siligut Jun 2012 #11
re:WashPost will not retract 'outsourcing' story allan01 Jun 2012 #12
some are cross posted in different groups notadmblnd Jun 2012 #13
This one deserves multiple posting. DCBob Jun 2012 #18
Why should WaPo take back the truth? meow2u3 Jun 2012 #14
Like the right cares nxylas Jun 2012 #15
Proof that the NeoCons would rather wait for Brother Jeb... McCamy Taylor Jun 2012 #16
Good for them. n/t davidwparker Jun 2012 #17
A small, but important victory. 99Forever Jun 2012 #19
NEVER USE POLITICO! Veracious Jun 2012 #21
They are owned by the rightwing Albritton crowd, though...so in this case, if they're saying WAPO MADem Jun 2012 #22
Romney is now the OUTSOURCERESS bucolic_frolic Jun 2012 #23
Romney is the Outsource Pioneer. Outsourcing hits home with ALL Americans. pacalo Jun 2012 #26
RMoney wanted them to print a story about how Greed is good. BootinUp Jun 2012 #25
It's the truth. Romney did try to censor this story. Dawson Leery Jun 2012 #27
Stew in your own juices, Willard. ... Stew, baby, stew! Bozita Jun 2012 #28
Why should they retract the story? clang1 Jun 2012 #29
Really. Do you have any proof of this? Arkana Jun 2012 #30
Wow: "off the record private meeting" with a major newspaper during a presidential campaign ?! KurtNYC Jun 2012 #31
Would you like some whine with that red herring, Mitt? rocktivity Jun 2012 #32
Total respect for WaPo! I've been seeing inklings of the return of REAL journalism lately. ;) n/t progressivebydesign Jun 2012 #34
The Romney rebuttal was hilarious railsback Jun 2012 #35
About time the Press evilhime Jun 2012 #36

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
1. Thank God
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 03:54 PM
Jun 2012

I was starting to worry we would have another fiasco like "The Reagans" miniseries that CBS wussed out of in 2003.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
5. Just makes it even worse for Rmoney..
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 04:01 PM
Jun 2012

Their attempts to get the story retracted just highlights the story even more.

"I dont have anything for you on that"..... HA!

siligut

(12,272 posts)
11. Censorship, used to keep the ignorant, ignorant.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 04:44 PM
Jun 2012

Good for WaPo. And I hope that after the "private meeting" they are concerned enough with Romney team tactics to keep publishing the truth about Mitt.

allan01

(1,950 posts)
12. re:WashPost will not retract 'outsourcing' story
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 04:47 PM
Jun 2012

how come some stories get doubble posted . i see this one and another on the front page? need input. thanks

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
13. some are cross posted in different groups
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 05:14 PM
Jun 2012

for example somone could have posted it as Latest Breaking News, while somone else ay have posted it in General Discussion. it gives the article more exposure. If you aren't interested in reading about it again, the just skip over it.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
15. Like the right cares
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 05:44 PM
Jun 2012

They will just start saying that the Post was forced to retract its story, and eventually, they will start believing it.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
19. A small, but important victory.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 06:25 PM
Jun 2012

That is, if WaPo doesn't fold down the road. I NEVER underestimate what 1%ers are willing and quite capable of doing to get their way. These sociopaths do not play by rules and they play for keeps. I'm not sayin', I'm just sayin'.

Veracious

(234 posts)
21. NEVER USE POLITICO!
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 06:27 PM
Jun 2012

These guys have the worst website design and antiquated coding... Poltitico is unreliable and should never be used to cite any soruces.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
22. They are owned by the rightwing Albritton crowd, though...so in this case, if they're saying WAPO
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 06:40 PM
Jun 2012

would not be bullied, that means WAPO really would not be bullied!

bucolic_frolic

(43,259 posts)
23. Romney is now the OUTSOURCERESS
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 10:22 PM
Jun 2012

GOP got duped when they went at Obama for attacks on wealth.

Obama wasn't going to attack wealth. Private property is perhaps
the most sacred American Value.

Now the GOP has shot their load and Dems are bludgeoning Mitts
the Outsourceress for his record. Voters and workers understand
the issue that way, they don't like overt attacks on wealth, but
they understand that many friends and relatives lost their jobs
when CEO's exported them.

Well played, Barack Obama! You are one shrewd man.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
26. Romney is the Outsource Pioneer. Outsourcing hits home with ALL Americans.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jun 2012
During the nearly 15 years that Romney was actively involved in running Bain, a private equity firm that he founded, it owned companies that were pioneers in the practice of shipping work from the United States to overseas call centers and factories making computer components, according to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
27. It's the truth. Romney did try to censor this story.
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 11:44 PM
Jun 2012

That is telling as to why type of leader he would be.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
31. Wow: "off the record private meeting" with a major newspaper during a presidential campaign ?!
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jun 2012

In journalism when a source wants to tell you something "off the record" it actually means that you can use it but you can't attribute it to them. For a presidential campaign there is no "off the record" -- they are the only entity that would ask for a retraction

Not only is Prince Romney out of touch but so is his campaign staff. They all seem to operate under the assumption that the regular rules don't apply to them and that reporting relevant facts is somehow unfair or out of bounds.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
32. Would you like some whine with that red herring, Mitt?
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 09:52 AM
Jun 2012
From the WaPo article:
Mitt Romney’s financial company, Bain Capital, invested in a series of firms that specialized in relocating jobs done by American workers to new facilities in low-wage countries like China and India...

Bain’s foray into outsourcing began in 1993 when the private equity firm took a stake in Corporate Software Inc., or CSI, after helping to finance a $93 million buyout of the firm. CSI...provided a range of services including outsourcing of customer support. Initially, CSI employed U.S. workers to provide these services but by the mid-1990s was setting up call centers outside the country.

..Two years after Bain invested in the firm, CSI merged with another enterprise to form a new company called Stream International Inc...The corporate merger that created Stream also gave birth to another, related business known as Modus Media Inc., which specialized in helping companies outsource their manufacturing...


From Romney's "rebuttal":
The Washington Post asserted that under Mitt Romney Bain Capital sent jobs overseas based on an analysis of 6 companies...(including)
CSI
Stream
Modus Media
...No call centers at CSI or then Stream Int’l were moved offshore under Mitt Romney...


R-Money is comparing apples to oranges: unless he can prove that the companies in question were NOT in the business of outsourcing U.S. jobs -- even if they created U.S. jobs in the process -- WaPo has nothing to retract.


rocktivity

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
35. The Romney rebuttal was hilarious
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 02:51 PM
Jun 2012

Getting some former CEOs together to reminisce about dead companies, without any evidence other than their 'word'. I bet WaPo was laughing their asses off when the Romney bus left their building.

evilhime

(326 posts)
36. About time the Press
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 03:26 PM
Jun 2012

started doing their jobs and sticking with it instead of running away with tails tucked.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»WashPost will not retract...