Nope. Not buying it.

I have never been polled. Most of the polls online requires a log in. I do not like log in options because of the online print it leaves and the fallout of junk emails.

Freepers and other racist sites spam online polls and brag loudly about shifting results

In defense of Reuters/Ipsos their phone polls are very reliable I used to work for Ipson/Read and their phone discipline is impressive

Also, at the end of the linked article:

An average of polls aggregated by Real Clear Politics showed Clinton ahead of Trump by 6.8 percentage points on Friday, up from 3.9 on Aug. 1.

I suspect that in the next couple of months Hillary's lead will drop somewhat thanks to attack ads etc. (Ben Ga Zi and E-MALE ) GOPer Congress critters will be desperate to attack Hillary any way they can to drive down the Democratic vote, it's their only hope of hanging onto the House and Senate.

and they all continue to show Clinton above 70% to Trump's 20+%. So far I trust their odds more than polls because folks actually bet money on who will win. Predictwise has Clinton at 77% and steadily going up.
There's been a spate of negative PR against Clinton's emails just today, noticed it as I scanned the news on major networks. The games they play!

Better to view this as a single poll among many polls. Better still to focus more on state-by-state polls.

Side note: FiveThirtyEight has three Ipsos polls in the national polling list that overlap with one another:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/

one minute she is up 9-11 points...the next minute she is up by 3....I am really getting sick and tired of all of these stupid polls.

To advance the meme that "the polls are all over the place and can't be trusted."

They arise like clockwork whenever a D gets a sizable lead.

I call BULLSHIT .
coming off the worst week in history for a candidate?
Double bullshit.

Oh great thanks for sharing now I won't sleep well. Cheers mate.

see: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html#polls

Ryan, McCain & Ayoutte. (sarcasm)

I don't believe that at all.

Reuters was an outlier 4 years ago showing Romney ahead, and appears intent to retain its reputation as such.

Trust the averages, people.

And doesn't have enough Hispanics to statistically measure them (even though they can't because non-random online poll).

There are problems with this poll and they changed the methodology this week, further muddying the reliability of it.

Nothing but click bait. Trump may win two states tops.

Barring that, I'm snoozing until the election.

I remember these lame ass polls from the Obama vs R$ election.
They were so horrible, that R$ thought he'd one and didn't even have a concession speech.

when they show our candidate leading.

and thus should only be trusted as much as a Republican politician.

because he makes them money. The more white knuckles and baited breaths, the better ratings, the more polls taken.

To quote the Federalist papers: "beware those who have a vested interest in disorder."

general election.

And that all of the way through the primary process, Hillary Clinton did far less well than Bernie Sanders in a general election match-up with Trump. So why is anyone surprised at this point?

With any luck at all, the Donald will continue to be such an idiot that he will fall and fall and fall in the polls and even in the general election. But the most important point is not to be complacent, to understand that the election is far from won at this point.

I will be so grateful to never see or hear from that idiot again. I know that's not going to happen. He'll reinvent himself I suppose. A new television show or something.

Other polling outfits.

The polling average on fivethirtyeight still has her winning by about 7%.

It's drawing an us-versus-them line.

This is what I believe the party is not understanding in this campaign. Policy is not an issue in this campaign -- it is being driven by identity and tribe, especially on the Republican side, where more voters are part of a loyalty-based part of society.