Third-party candidates in late push for debate stage
Source: The Hill
Third-party candidates are racing against the clock to meet the threshold to qualify for the presidential debate stage.
The first debate isnt until Sept. 26 at Hostra University in Hempstead, N.Y., but the campaigns expect a decision on who makes the cut in early September, giving Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein about one month to hit the 15 percent national polling threshold.
The candidates and their campaigns are in an all-out sprint to boost their polling numbers ahead of that deadline.
Johnson and the Greens have surpassed one hurdle both are routinely included in the polls that will determine who makes the stage after being left out of many polls earlier in the cycle. But reaching 15 percent in five national surveys leading up to the debate remains a steep climb for the underfunded and little-known third-party candidates.
-snip-
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/290598-third-party-candidates-in-late-push-for-debate-stage
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit alleging that the Commission on Presidential Debates violated federal antitrust laws and the First Amendment by excluding third-party candidates.
In a ruling Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary Collyer dismissed a suit filed last year by the Libertarian and Green parties as well their respective 2012 presidential nominees, former New Mexico Republican Gov. Gary Johnson and Jill Stein. Each also happens to be his or her party's presidential nominee again this year.
Collyer's ruling found little, if any, merit in the suit. She said antitrust law had no relevance to the situation and many of the ills the plaintiffs complained of were of their own making, not the debate commission.
"Plaintiffs in this case have not alleged a non-speculative injury traceable to the Commission," wrote Collyer, who was appointed by President George W. Bush. "Plaintiffs alleged injuries are wholly speculative and are dependent entirely on media coverage decisions. The alleged injuriesfailure to receive media coverage and to garner votes, federal matching funds, and campaign contributionswere caused by the lack of popular support of the candidates and their parties sufficient to attract media attention."
Ron Nielson, Johnsons campaign manager, said the campaign is considering an appeal but is also urging the commission to allow Johnson into the debates.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/08/judge-rejects-suit-against-presidential-debate-commission-226720
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...and major Party candidate have no obligation to debate people they don't want to debate.
The Commission on Presidential Debates organize debates that the major candidates choose to participate in, but are under no legal obligation to participate in. There's no legal basis upon which other parties can demand that the rules for access be changed.
tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)I just hope that Trump-enabling Stein isn't included. I'm absolutely sure she'd spend more time attacking Hillary than Trump.
Trump won't show up, and Hillary certainly isn't getting on the stage without him.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)paleotn
(17,931 posts)NO!!!