Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,054 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 10:39 PM Jun 2012

Appeals court rejects ruling allowing corporate campaign funding

Source: Washington Post

An appellate court on Thursday rejected a lower court ruling that companies could donate directly to political campaigns.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond reversed a Virginia district court decision in the criminal case U.S. v. Danielczyk, which concerned contributions to Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.

U.S. District Judge James Cacheris ruled in 2011 that the Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision gave corporations First Amendment rights to free political speech that were equal to those of individual people. In the Citizens United case, the court allowed corporations to spend as much as they wanted on elections as long as the money wasn’t given directly to candidates.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/appeals-court-rejects-ruling-allowing-corporate-campaign-funding/2012/06/28/gJQAGjgi9V_story.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court rejects ruling allowing corporate campaign funding (Original Post) alp227 Jun 2012 OP
re: An appellate court on Thursday rejected a lower court ruling that companies could donate directl clang1 Jun 2012 #1
I believe the 30 year long rigthwing flood sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #2
To continue w/your metaphor, its just the wave crashing against the levee wall. Huey P. Long Jun 2012 #3
 

clang1

(884 posts)
1. re: An appellate court on Thursday rejected a lower court ruling that companies could donate directl
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:38 AM
Jun 2012

Thank goodness...
Appeals court rejects ruling allowing corporate campaign funding



WHY DON'T THEY JUST SAY IT IS THE FASCISM THAT IT IS. THEY ALREADY HAVE CITIZENS UNITED. THEY WANT BOTH THE BANK AND THE MONEY IS WHAT THIS IS.


TYRANNY.













Meanwhile...The Progression continues....

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
2. I believe the 30 year long rigthwing flood
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:49 PM
Jun 2012

may have reached its high water mark and will now begin to recede.

 

Huey P. Long

(1,932 posts)
3. To continue w/your metaphor, its just the wave crashing against the levee wall.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:53 PM
Jun 2012

Sure, the wave may recede momentarily, but do not kid yourself.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court rejects rul...