Bernie Sanders endorses Colorado single-payer health initiative
Source: Durango Herald
By Peter Marcus Herald staff writer
DENVER U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday endorsed a single-payer health care ballot proposal for Colorado, as infighting between Democrats raged on.
Sanders made the announcement through his new group, Our Revolution, which has seen infighting similar to battles between Democrats in Colorado over the single-payer issue.
The endorsement from the former Democratic presidential candidate was announced by proponents of the single-payer initiative on Thursday, ending speculation that Sanders would back the issue.
There is an important ballot initiative in Colorado which calls for a (single-payer) health care system, Sanders said at an event in Vermont. It is absurd, it is beyond belief, that here in America we remain the only major country on Earth not to guarantee health care to all people. If that proposal can win in Colorado, I believe that idea will spread around the country.
Colorado Democrats are split over the ballot proposal, with ProgressNow Colorado recently opposing it. The opposition drew attacks from supporters of the initiative, who said ProgressNow failed them.
Read more: http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20160825/NEWS01/160829707&template=mobileart
msongs
(67,405 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I just read that he is going to campaign for Hillary and Maggie Hassan in New Hampshire on Labor Day.
Divine Discontent
(21,056 posts)Baobab
(4,667 posts)This applies to both health care and education and has since 1995. Carve outs are explicit reservations that need to go right into the FTA text before its finished (in the case of GATS they would need to be agreed upon by any other country that had been involved in the health insurance market in the US, which may still be zero because of the 50 states but not for long- It has to be explicit so that foreign corporations don't get an entitlement to market access "forever" which trumps any national interest.
Basically its a guarantee that their firms would always be able to sell their wares (such as cheap insurance for people with pre-existing conditions - or poor people- (because of a standstill clause enacted in the 90s we likely will lose any changes subsequent to those dates, such as February 26, 1998 ) its likely that that will be how poor people are covered- they likely would agree to travel for hospitalization- better than no care at all-
Its a right to permanent market access without government interference that they get by entering the market.
Carve outs are urgently needed soon! Without a carve out no state single payer can work, because they wont be able to be single payer, they will be stuck as a sort of expensive insurance of last resort for the poor or sick, a high risk pool that is bound to become extremely expensive or low quality high cost, and then collapse in three or four years from the adverse selection death spiral, like all the others have.
Fred Drum
(293 posts)they hate to hear the solution is to get rid of them
lots of coal miners hate the sun, also
Lunabell
(6,080 posts)But if they're true Dems, they care about our country and the millions of people in it.
Response to ErikJ (Original post)
Post removed
Lunabell
(6,080 posts)The Dems need to bring this country kicking and screaming in to the 21st Century.
littlewolf
(3,813 posts)and it died ...
DrToast
(6,414 posts)I'm in favor of it, but if it will fail it's a bad idea.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)But the Vermont population is too small of a pool to do it without govt aid which they didnt have for it.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)The problem is that people are all in favor of (state) government largesse, right up until they're asked to pay for it.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)Maybe they should be changing their name. ProgressSomeTimeInTheFuture