More Trump tapes surface with crude sex remarks
Source: Washington Post
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, already under siege for vulgar comments about forcing women into sex, also had crude, sexually explicit conversations in a series of radio interviews over the past 23 years, even noting how voluptuous his daughter was.
On a new batch of recordings from Howard Sterns radio shows aired Saturday by CNN, Trump said he would have no problem having sex with 24-year-olds, that he couldnt care less if he satisfies the women he sleeps with, that its checkout time once women reach the age of 35 and that he had engaged in three-way sex.
Havent we all? Trump told Stern on his SiriusXM satellite radio show in 2008. Are we babies?
Trump also described barging in on nude Miss Universe beauty pageant contestants in their dressing room, characterizing his visits as inspections by the contests owner.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/more-trump-tapes-surface-with-crude-sex-remarks/2016/10/08/7129cea2-8d92-11e6-bff0-d53f592f176e_story.html
and the producer of The Apprentice says there's stuff out there even worse than the billy Bush tape...
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Videos
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)On a show
misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)The day of Trump's debate.
By the time the debate begins, Bill Clinton's consentual dalliance will be long overshadowed by the sickening vulgarity of Donald Trump's way of life.
mopinko
(70,118 posts)talk about your due diligence, corporate media.
we have been quoting that crap for a year.
right?
moondust
(19,989 posts)knows there are liable to be cameras and microphones most anywhere trying to catch candid moments the paparazzi can sell. Of course it's possible that he didn't care what he said and did, foolishly believing the bad stuff could always be edited out before putting it on the air.
progree
(10,908 posts)and considered entering the 2004 race, so he couldn't have been naive (?) about concepts like opposition research and the risk of recorders everywhere and the motivation of people to record everything a potential presidential candidate says. So I guess he thought remarks like he made on The Tape in 2005 wouldn't hurt him much or at all, or maybe even enhance his "real man" image. (Or the Tic Tacs were laced with something).
(On the 2000 race, it was as a Reform Party candidate -- thanks to Ross Perot's 1996 run, the Reform Party had ballot access and qualified for matching funds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_presidential_campaign,_2000
I chose the words "effortful run" in the title because some thought his real motivation (as do some in 2016) was only to build his brand. But anyway he "made numerous media appearances as a candidate, traveled to campaign events in Florida, California, and Minnesota, and qualified for two presidential primaries." per the above link )
I had no idea he had ever run for office before. I was even working from home in 2000 and watched a lot of the campaign coverage (that was heavily biased against Gore IMO). The wiki says he first considered running for President in 1987. Kinda surprised he never made a big enough splash for me to notice.
demgurl
(3,214 posts)He believes everyone thinks the way he does and so it was nothing out of the ordinary in his he lives his life. Really sad.
moondust
(19,989 posts)It's not like he seriously pays attention to anybody but himself enough to know what is generally acceptable speech and behavior and what is not.
4lbs
(6,858 posts)that is at the end of each episode was much, much longer than what was shown.
At the end of each episode, the two competing teams would meet in the boardroom and discuss their respective strategies to complete the assigned task, and which team "won" (generated more sales/revenue). At that point, the winning team would leave, and the losing team would then face elimination of one of their members. That's when they often turned on each other, and then Trump would make a decision and utter his infamous "You're Fired!" phrase.
What was shown would usually be about 20 minutes or so.
However, the article said that the actual boardroom 'meeting' took 4.... 5.... 6 hours or longer.
Also, the cameras were 'rolling' the entire time.
So.... that leaves 5+ hours per episode that wasn't shown.
RaymondLuxuryYacht
(66 posts)4 year olds?
Sorry, I do r****t, too.
Stonepounder
(4,033 posts)as the nominee too soon. Hang in there another couple of weeks, so the Rethugs have NO time to replace him with anyone. Maybe have him quit two days before the election, when all polls are predicting a Clinton landslide 'of epic proportions'.
elmac
(4,642 posts)if Trump endorsed her
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)Not to excuse Trump, but all the guests on Stern's show are expected to engage in this kind of sex banter with the host. I've only ever listened to short portions of Stern's show, but every show is the same boorish talk.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It's not as if Trump is actually a gentleman who is simply acting for the microphone. This is who Trump really is, and the evidence for it isn't just limited to Stern's show.
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)24 is in fact legal. No matter how old you are.
You're entitled to feel 35 is the cut-off age for who you'll sleep with. No matter how old you are.
3-somes are legal.
You're entitled to 'not care if you satisfy' your partner.
And to be quite frank, this wouldn't be America ... if all of the above were not true.
Distasteful as it is, this is all much tamer than the GHBHP comment. At least CONSENT is involved in these comments.
That all being said ... I cannot IMAGINE there being EVEN ONE FEMALE in the entirety of this country ... who ... upon reading these remarks ... would not be thinking to themselves ... "WHAT A DISGUSTING PIG. I would never VOTE, for this f**king @$$hole, no matter how much you PAID ME!!!".
Well, not unless ... they were in some real need of emotional counseling, anyways. In which case, I hope they're able to get the help they need.
Drumpf has absolutely GOT to have just lost around 95% of the female vote over the past couple of days. The other 5% ... either somehow entirely missed the maelstrom of the past 2 days ... or they're voting for Drumpf because if they don't, their husbands will chain them up in the basement and feed them gruel for the next year.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Trump is trying to dismiss his comments as "locker room banter" and claiming that's not who he really is.
If you want to get into technicalities on what is legal and what is not, it's also in fact legal to claim you want to grope women without their consent. Whether or not Trump did something illegal is not the issue at this point (unless more women surface who claim sexual assault).