Glenn Beck: Hillary Clinton is a 'moral, ethical choice' for Republicans
Source: CNN
Conservative political commentator and media personality Glenn Beck said the election of Hillary Clinton as president by refusing to support Donald Trump is "a moral, ethical choice" for Republicans.
The outspoken opponent of the GOP's presidential nominee wrote on Facebook over the weekend that every voter had to decide for themselves what constitutes "a bridge too far," after the release of footage last week in which Trump can be heard making lewd and sexually aggressive comments about women.
"It is not acceptable to ask a moral, dignified man to cast his vote to help elect an immoral man who is absent decency or dignity," Beck wrote on Facebook in reference to Trump. "If the consequence of standing against Trump and for principles is indeed the election of Hillary Clinton, so be it. At least it is a moral, ethical choice."
. . . .
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/11/politics/glenn-beck-hillary-clinton-moral-ethical-choice/index.html
Now there's a headline I never thought I'd see.
SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)busterbrown
(8,515 posts)as a moderate.. New image..Perhaps a contributor for msnbc or Cnn as a beginning.
Is he fucking nuts or what..
PatSeg
(47,613 posts)I saw him twice on Lawrence O'Donnell's show and he was extremely rational and sane. Maybe that was some kind of audition in his mind?
TexasBushwhacker
(20,219 posts)Not to make light of mental illness, but when he goes on his wild paranoid rants, he reminds me of my dad when he was manic.
PatSeg
(47,613 posts)His rants were pretty extraordinary. I was never sure if it was real or performance. Perhaps he really is on medication, he certainly is different.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,219 posts)It said that he had a drug and alcohol problem about 20 years ago and that he admitted he was ADHD. A lot of bipolar folks self medicate with street drugs and/or alcohol. For my dad it was booze.
PatSeg
(47,613 posts)I recall hearing he was an alcoholic, but I didn't know about the ADHD. He certainly does appear like a recovered alcoholic and/or drug addict.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,176 posts)as his own show has been all an act for the most part. Although I haven't even seen a clip of him for years now. No one can actually be as crazy as he put on. He found out, just like Trump, how anyone who has the gift of the gab can use and abuse the FEAR trigger to rake in viewers and supporters using any kind of lies and insane theories to back up your crafted view of how thing are. People will pay you money to scare the shit out of them. Someone to explain why you are so miserable, feel so insignificant and not getting ahead; that there must be some plot brewing for that to happen.
He's now made multi-millions doing that and I think he sees that the writing is on the wall for the crazies he helped create. When Trump loses, he is smart enough to predict the backlash afterwards, and while Christie, Pence, Giuliani and others are caught in the net along with Trump, he will be able to brag about how he saw it coming and that he will explain it all to you in his NEW SHOW!
RussBLib
(9,037 posts)cstanleytech
(26,320 posts)is gullible enough to believe it and hire him.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Beck is a complicated person. He certainly seems to be seriously disturbed in some ways, but basically I think he played a role in his Faux days. Faux was the biggest stage he had been on and he wanted to be the most noticed actor.
And while his hyperbole often rose to the world class level and beyond, some of the things he was saying were actually thought out. Many of the left ridiculed him when he talked about the desire of extremists to establish a regional caliphate. But that is EXACTLY what ISIS tried to do -- and largely succeeded. On that basis alone, I think Beck should be given some consideration as a person who is not nearly as insane as his stage persona.
I would equate him to Jim Cramer of Mad Money. Both play a schtick. Neither is Nostradamus, but they are both probably a lot more sensible then they appear when playing to their respective constituencies.
And who knows? Beck may see an opportunity to rejoin a somewhat less insane Faux "News" in the post-Ailes era. He may see Limbaugh at the end of his time, and Britebart/Drudge/Trump going off the deep end to oblivion. He may be anticipating a realignment of the Right, with opportunities for reasonable conservatives with some street cred. This is a place Krautheimer has tried to occupy. And years ago, that would have been William Buckley and William Rusher.
It will be interesting. I think this is a very conscious move on Beck's part, trying to get to the front of the next parade.
groundloop
(11,523 posts)BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)cstanleytech
(26,320 posts)Towlie
(5,328 posts)CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)thejoker123
(279 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)PatSeg
(47,613 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)calimary
(81,511 posts)From the poem "The Second Coming" by William Butler Yeats. I've never been creeped out by a poem before, but I sure was with this one. It's even more relevant, and creepy, NOW, than it was when I first studied it in high school English Lit class.
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/43290
ET Awful
(24,753 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 11, 2016, 01:41 PM - Edit history (1)
This one has always creeped me out too. Still one of my favorites.
bluesbassman
(19,379 posts)His media empire is crumbling. He sees the writing on the wall so I suspect he will be reinventing himself over the next few months to be the voice of "sane" conservatives.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Unlike many so-called "evangelicals", he seems to be sticking to his moral guns and has been blasting Trump for his un-Christian behavior for months now. He's pointedly refused to endorse Trump, and has called out Christian leaders who HAVE endorsed him for ignoring the fact that Trump is a greedy womanizer who lives in opposition to all of the ideals outlined in the Bible. He has also blatantly drawn parallels between the Trump campaign and the rise of the German brownshirts. This new comment about Clinton isn't particularly surprising in that light.
Beck isn't endorsing Clinton though. He's made it fairly clear that he's voting for Johnson because he sees the Libertarians as the "least offensive option" in this election.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)Glenn beck actually said this
Old Vet
(2,001 posts)Mr tea party endorsing Clinton, This election is becoming more and more twisted on every level.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I swear to christ I hate 2016...
DarthDem
(5,256 posts). . . has been the utter unraveling of the sanctimonious, far-less-intelligent-than-he-believes-himself-to-be Greenwald.
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)like a dream come true
herding cats
(19,568 posts)I know a Tea Partyist in Texas who may have just choked to death today.
Initech
(100,105 posts)aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?????
Brainstormy
(2,381 posts)Beck is a Mormon
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)a Moron.
But broken clocks, I suppose.
George II
(67,782 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)Wow. Trump is going to lose in epic numbers. And I hope his daughter, who is so worried about her "brand," but not about daddy groping women, loses her business.
bucolic_frolic
(43,311 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,907 posts)Republicans have really screwed up when this yoyo comes down on our side!
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)lamenting over the damage that the hate mongering that he's spewed over the years has caused. I think he suggested that he has probably earned a spot in hell.
DinahMoeHum
(21,812 posts). . .It's not the fall that kills, it's the sudden stop.
Not Sure
(735 posts)I actually found myself retweeting Ari Fleischer yesterday. WTF?
progressoid
(49,999 posts)TNNurse
(6,929 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,045 posts)MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)Unlike others of his ilk
I am not familiar with him but he can't be all bad if he's putting country first
COUNTRY FIRST!!
packman
(16,296 posts)being spot-on twice a day. Glen sees his world falling apart and is sniffing around for new cash piles like a dog sniffing another's ass
Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)What in the hell would someone like Bleck know about ethics or morals? Someone else put those words in his mouth.
Lulu KC
(2,574 posts)The one I read last night made it sound like he made this choice because he thinks they can bring her down if she's elected, whereas if Trump is elected it's the living end of the GOP. I didn't pick up on that in this CNN piece. I'll see if I can find it. It made chills run down my spine.
(Reading so much and laughing at so many pu**y memes that I can't keep my sources straight! Please don't judge me.)
forest444
(5,902 posts)It was a matter of time until he'd arrive at the only sensible conclusion for those of us that do, that being that the GOP has unfortunately been radicalized and driven off the deep end beyond any point of return.
foo_bar
(4,193 posts)But he cares about... something, so that's progress.
forest444
(5,902 posts)Plus, as unstable and changeable as that man is, he might change his mind on a whim five days from now.
forest444
(5,902 posts)I mentioned it in the past once or twice here on DU, to unmitigated scorn and laughter.
But who's to say? Trump's opinions have usually been centrist to center-left, he and the Clintons have been friends for years (or were, anyway), and really, he's nothing if not a showman.
If 30 or 50 years from now some talented historian discovers that Trump did, in fact, run to help assure that Hillary could be our next president, that would be one hell of a show.
I'll tell you though: I'll always be grateful to him for derailing Jeb's 'shock-and-awe' campaign. There no doubt in my mind that if Jeb had won the nomination, the Bushes and their allies in Wall Street and intelligence would have made sure he won (think USS Cole - which we almost had another incident similar to, btw), and frankly I don't think U.S. democracy as we know it could survive another Bush.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)... you know it's gone too far.
First George Will, now Glenn Beck? Who's next? The reanimated corpse of Lee Atwater?