Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,981 posts)
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 03:46 PM Oct 2016

Conservative Legal Scholars Decide Trump Isn't Worth It

Source: Mother Jones

But for conservative and libertarian legal scholars who have dedicated their careers to an interpretation of the Constitution that promotes limited government, Trump presents a conundrum. On the one hand, he promises to appoint justices like Scalia, whom they generally admire. On the other hand, if his campaign is any indication, a President Trump would trample this same vision of the Constitution with his authoritarian tendencies, including his policies against the freedom of the press and in favor of banning all Muslims from entering the United States. So is a Trump presidency worth supporting for the sake of Trump Supreme Court appointments?

For 29 "originalist" legal scholars, the answer is no. Originalists, such as Scalia and Justice Clarence Thomas, believe judges should interpret the Constitution as it was intended when written, rather than as a living, changing document. On Monday, the group released a letter titled "Originalists Against Trump," which laid out their reasons for opposing the Republican nominee. "Many Americans still support Trump in the belief that he will protect the Constitution," the letter states. "We understand that belief, but we do not share it."

The letter addresses the issue of the Supreme Court, stating, "We also understand the argument that Trump will nominate qualified judicial candidates." But the scholars add, "We do not trust him to do so. More importantly, we do not trust him to respect constitutional limits in the rest of his conduct in office, of which judicial nominations are only one part."

Many of the most prominent conservative and libertarian legal scholars signed the letter, including Steven Calabresi, who co-founded the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group. "If there is one person who in a certain sense typifies sort of the average Federalist Society member, it's hard to find someone who typifies it better than Steve Calabresi," says Ilya Somin, a libertarian professor at George Mason's Antonin Scalia Law School, who also signed the letter. Another signatory to the letter, law professor Jonathan Adler, is known as the legal mind behind the latest major legal challenge to Obamacare.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/conservative-legal-scholars-against-donald-trump-constitution

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservative Legal Scholars Decide Trump Isn't Worth It (Original Post) highplainsdem Oct 2016 OP
By which they mean: forest444 Oct 2016 #1
I'm disappointed that the MJ writer accepts, spooky3 Oct 2016 #2
I'm disappointed that Danascot Oct 2016 #3
True! spooky3 Oct 2016 #4

forest444

(5,902 posts)
1. By which they mean:
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 04:13 PM
Oct 2016

"He shows us up for what we really are, and not the virtuous propaganda image we and our degenerate bankrollers have spent 40+ years cultivating."

spooky3

(34,455 posts)
2. I'm disappointed that the MJ writer accepts,
Wed Oct 19, 2016, 06:48 PM
Oct 2016

Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, these "conservatives'" claims that they are interpreting the Constitution as it was originally intended. They interpret it to lead to the conclusion that they want, not as intended originally.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservative Legal Schola...