Report: Romney Refused To Apologize To Trump During Secretary Of State Bid
Source: Talking Points Memo
By MATT SHUHAM Published DECEMBER 14, 2016, 10:08 AM EDT
Mitt Romney refused to apologize publicly to President-elect Donald Trump for his campaign trail criticism while he was under consideration for secretary of state, according to a report from the Washington Post Wednesday.
Romney wasn't an obvious choice to lead Trump's State Department. During the presidential campaign, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee called Trump a "fraud" and a "phony" who would hurt American interests.
The Post, though, cited an unnamed close Romney ally who said Trump had been willing to consider Romney for the job if his former critic apologized to him publicly. Romney, the source said, refused.
Trump spokesman Jason Miller told the Post that account was completely false and denied Trump wanted any apology from Romney. However, an unnamed Trump friend said the President, in the Posts words, enjoyed watching his dinner partner grovel at a highly-publicized dinner at Jean-Gorges in New York, as well as afterwards when Romney complimented Trump to the waiting media gaggle.
-snip-
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/report-romney-refused-public-apologize-to-trump
Moostache
(9,897 posts)If he had walked out of that restaurant, grabbed the media microphones like a boss and said, "That fraud Trump invited me here under false pretenses, offering a cabinet position in exchange for my soul...well, I just told him not now, not ever..." (mic drop and exit stage right)...had Mittens found the balls to do THAT? He would be redeemed in my eyes...alas, the slimebag did not have it in him...
No respect for Ted cruz endorsing Trump either.
PatSeg
(47,695 posts)The only time I really respected Romney is when he criticized Trump and called him out as the fraud that he is. It was the most coherent and on message that I have seen him.
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)Screw orange hitler.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Barack Obama is president of the United States.
Not Mitt Romney, and not Donald trump.
narnian60
(3,510 posts)tavernier
(12,410 posts)brush
(53,962 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,350 posts)We are in serious trouble
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)C Moon
(12,225 posts)is a perfect character for Trump.
Bayard
(22,199 posts)I'm assuming Trump wanted that apology on bended knee?
LonePirate
(13,435 posts)McMullin, if he is still a Republican, might be the last decent one out there. The rest of them are beyond help and hope.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)/inˈteɡrədē/
noun
noun: integrity
1.
the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness.
"he is known to be a man of integrity"
synonyms: honesty, probity, rectitude, honor, good character, principle(s), ethics, morals, righteousness, morality, virtue, decency, fairness, scrupulousness, sincerity, truthfulness, trustworthiness
"I never doubted his integrity"
Generator
(7,770 posts)legitimizes him. I can kinda understand Gore giving it a shot. But Gore isn't an enabler. Anyone in the Republicon party enables him by not demanding (at the very least) he be vetted by releasing taxes or divesting of business. Somebody DEMAND something from Trump. UGH. They go there to get favors and hope the king treats them well. fuck that shit
karynnj
(59,508 posts)With Romney, the question is whether he - in good faith - thought he could be an influenece on Trump by being in the room when some foreign policy decisions would be made AND whether he seriously could support to the best of his abilities the policies the President decided on. These two things might be at odds with each other for anyone alarmed by Trump's foreign policy or lack of a coherent foreign policy. On the one hand, they could end up being the sane voice in the room and potentially preventing something bad or doing something good - per their definition (not ours) of good and bad. On the other, they could become the face of a foreign policy that they strongly disagree with.
Consider that Colin Powell, who was actively considered as a potential nominee by both parties, was completely compromized by the UN speech on Iraq that he made defending the need to attack. He supposedly was not part of the pack for the war, but he will forever be seen as the one who made the case for invasion. I wonder if he contemplated either quitting or refusing to give that speech - which could have resulted in him being asked to quit. Powell could not have known what would be asked of him when he agreed to be Secretary of State. I wonder if he ever has imagined what could have happened had he refused and quit stating he did not believe the case he was asked to make.
In 2000 or 2001, joining GWB's administration was joining many people that Powell had worked with under GHWB. For Romney, accepting being Secretary of State for Trump would be a blatant grab for the prestige that position brings. The comments he made during the election were very unusual and almost certainly his real opinions. The ONLY thing that has changed is that Trump won the Presidency.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)JCMach1
(27,585 posts)Keeping his powder dry...
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Although he shouldn't of had dinner with fuckface in the first place.
I can't believe things have gotten so bad that Mitt Romney, of all people, seems like a voice of semi-sanity. Holy shit.
bucolic_frolic
(43,436 posts)that these people meeting with Donald J. Trump
don't get a word in edgewise, are only being dictated to, and have no
effect on the outcome of anything at all
There is no dialogue. There is a meeting, boss and subordinate.
dreamland
(964 posts)Rmoney has lost all credence when he met the orangeutan for scallops.
What was the all smiles about, it not to kow-tow to the orange one.
Oh, maybe to get a job for Ronna, his niece, that's not nepotism, is it?