Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 05:13 PM Jan 2017

Immigrants who challenged in-state tuition policy win case

Source: Associated Press



KATE BRUMBACK, ASSOCIATED PRESS

ATLANTA (AP) — A judge says the Georgia university system must allow immigrants to pay in-state tuition if they’ve been granted temporary permission by the federal government to stay in the U.S.

Georgia’s state colleges and universities require verification of “lawful presence” in the U.S. for in-state tuition. The Board of Regents had said students with temporary permission to stay under a 2012 program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, didn’t meet that requirement.

A lawyer for 10 young immigrants who meet all the other requirements and who have been granted deferred action status argued in a petition filed in April that the federal Department of Homeland Security has said people who have qualified for the program are “lawfully present.”

Lawyers for the university system rejected that argument, saying the statement about lawful presence appeared in an FAQ section of the department’s website and not as an official policy or regulation.

In an order dated Friday, Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Gail Tusan said that while an official policy would be helpful, the fact that it is part of the department’s official website means it should be taken as an accurate statement of the federal government’s position.

Read more: http://www.salon.com/2017/01/03/immigrants-who-challenged-in-state-tuition-policy-win-case/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Immigrants who challenged in-state tuition policy win case (Original Post) DonViejo Jan 2017 OP
Good, for now. I'm sure the white wing dominated legislature and university system will appeal. Hoyt Jan 2017 #1
I'm not sure how I feel about this greymattermom Jan 2017 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Jake Stern Jan 2017 #3
Even if they reside in a different state ? n/t MichMan Jan 2017 #4
The court is following settled, accepted 14th Amendment jurisprudence: J_William_Ryan Jan 2017 #5

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
2. I'm not sure how I feel about this
Tue Jan 3, 2017, 05:34 PM
Jan 2017

I once had a PhD student who lived within walking distance of the school, in a different state (which can easily happen in Kansas City). She was denied in state tuition while the foreign students who had just arrived paid in state rates. She had to move across the state line.

Response to greymattermom (Reply #2)

J_William_Ryan

(1,753 posts)
5. The court is following settled, accepted 14th Amendment jurisprudence:
Wed Jan 4, 2017, 01:26 AM
Jan 2017

that one might be undocumented doesn’t mean he is ‘illegal,’ and is entitled to benefit from state laws, programs, and policies, such as paying in-state tuition to attend state colleges and universities.

Once a court determines the immigrant has entered the country absent authorization, or came to the country legally but remained in the country absent authorization, the immigrant is subject to deportation, rendering the issue of in-state tuition moot.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Immigrants who challenged...