Trump taps well of protest with calls for more drilling in national parks
Source: Reuters
11 JAN 2017 AT 08:51 ET
President-elect Donald Trump aims to open up federal lands to more energy development, tapping into a long-running and contentious debate over how best to manage Americas remaining wilderness.
The U.S. government holds title to about 500 million acres of land across the country, including national parks and forests, wildlife refuges and tribal territories stretching from the Arctic to the Gulf of Mexico. They overlay billions of barrels of oil and vast quantities of natural gas, coal, and uranium.
With Trump poised to take office on Jan. 20, energy companies and their lobbyists are eyeing a new gusher of federal drilling and mining leases after a period of stagnation under the administration of Barack Obama.
Oil output on federal land made up about a fifth of the national total in 2015 down from more than a third in 2010 while the number of onshore drilling leases fell about 15 percent, according to federal data.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/trump-taps-well-of-protest-with-calls-for-more-drilling-in-national-parks/
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Hell, every decent person on the planet is indeed disturbed about Comrade Casino and his gusher kinks...this is just another Republican kink-o-rama twist-and-turn on the GusherGate theme.
keithbvadu2
(36,809 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,458 posts)There's a big difference between drilling on Federally owned land, such as a U.S. Forest, and drilling in a national park. I suspect Raw Story got forests and parks mixed up again when it repackaged the story and gave it that headline.
That happens a lot.
I'll keep looking.
Bayard
(22,075 posts)Not acceptable under any circumstances. Sierra Club---start preparing the lawsuits! I'll sign every petition out there, but they don't matter a damn to these people. The only thing that will work is tying it up in the courts. These lands are held in trust for US.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Seems dumb.
I'd think if you were going for the most return for the taxpayers you could get a higher return years from now when oil or gas is more scarce?
BumRushDaShow
(129,020 posts)Flooding the market is not something the profit-mongers would want and certainly Pootie would have a fit.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)Transferring public lands to private interests has everything to do with it.
You know that, and I know that, but the Trumpers think that this will give them cheap gas.
Erasto
(18 posts)Someone will make a pile of money ruining our national parks, but we won't see a dime of it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)outside the parks. I used to be a real estate appraiser, so my mind went immediately to what the locusts will be paying. How low they could get the sale or lease prices down to before even their supporters on the right recognize it as legal theft?