Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 04:40 PM Jan 2017

Booker: Trump ban on admitting refugees 'fundamentally un-American'

Source: NJ.com

WASHINGTON -- U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, who has called for admitting more Syrians, blasted President Donald Trump's suspension of the refugee admittance program as "fundamentally un-American" and promised to "fight it every step of the way."

Booker (D-N.J.) returned from visiting a refugee camp in the Middle East last August and called on the U.S. to address "a humanitarian crisis of a scale rarely witnessed in the last 50 years." He and U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) helped block Republican-sponsored legislation designed to cut off the flow of refugees from Syria.

"To deny refugees the ability to seek sanctuary in the United States is to deny our very history," said Booker (D-N.J.), a new member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "President Trump's fundamentally un-American executive order stands in dark contrast to these ideals."

* * *
"By painting persecutors and their victims with the same broad brush, America's immigration policy will now alienate entire nations and their people, help our enemies spread propaganda about the United States, and aid radicals and violent extremists in their recruitment efforts," Booker said.

Read more: http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/01/booker_trump_ban_on_admitting_refugees_is_fundamen.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Booker: Trump ban on admitting refugees 'fundamentally un-American' (Original Post) TomCADem Jan 2017 OP
Nice, but where's the action? Lulu KC Jan 2017 #1
As a Senator, I Expect Him to Vote No... TomCADem Jan 2017 #2
Well, yes. The Democrats have no power in Congress. yardwork Jan 2017 #9
How about fundamentally BlueMTexpat Jan 2017 #3
Litigation, protests, noise bucolic_frolic Jan 2017 #4
It runs contrary to the values Booker and I and people at DU have. geek tragedy Jan 2017 #5
Many people value diversity. Igel Jan 2017 #6
Great post nt geek tragedy Jan 2017 #7
Actually its very American as its been done before and for the same reason because people were angry cstanleytech Jan 2017 #8

Lulu KC

(2,566 posts)
1. Nice, but where's the action?
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 05:21 PM
Jan 2017

I am starting to realize exactly how powerless the Democrats are. It's worse than I thought. It's all worse than I thought.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
2. As a Senator, I Expect Him to Vote No...
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 05:46 PM
Jan 2017

...if this comes up for a vote. Aside from that, Dems need to continue to speak out, rather then accept this as normal.

yardwork

(61,622 posts)
9. Well, yes. The Democrats have no power in Congress.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 10:28 PM
Jan 2017

The Republicans hold a majority in both houses of Congress. They control all the committees and the agenda.

This is what happens when we allow Republicans to win elections.

bucolic_frolic

(43,173 posts)
4. Litigation, protests, noise
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:18 PM
Jan 2017

That's where the action is

If we take this lying down, it will go unchallenged

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. It runs contrary to the values Booker and I and people at DU have.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 07:27 PM
Jan 2017

But they aren't un-American. Bigotry and xenophobia are mainstream values in the United States.

Igel

(35,317 posts)
6. Many people value diversity.
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 09:19 PM
Jan 2017

It's true, American values are diverse. That can be a problem.

The "diversity makes us strong" has to be viewed through the correct political lens.

Often that particular diversity is skin deep. You can have trivial differences in preferences for food, language, clothing, music, but in the end cultural diversity is much, much more than that--and such trivial differences can change while the culture stays virtually unaffected. I can be thoroughly American in my outlook when speaking Russian. On the other hand, I "know" enough Russianness to have the proper gut reaction in circumstances that involve neither food, fashion, folklore, nor festivals. You can be an English-speaking McDonald's-scarfing Cold-Play-listening Baptist and still be Russian at your core--or vice-versa. It's a kick, for example, to run into a black who's through-and-through Czech (a sell-out for some, but in the 1920s Boas pointed out cogently that skin color, teeth shape, hair cross-section and properties, and epicanthic folds on the one hand, language on the other, and I guess language on the third, are unrelated in any important way).

Consider that cilantro, chicken, beef, wheat (as in "wheat flour&quot , rice and cheese aren't Mexican. Go to 1491 and you'll find none of them. But Mexican cultures have survived the change in diet and language in many ways. What counts is interpersonal relationships and how society is structured, and for those we typically have very narrow blinders. There's one true morality and economic system, everything else is mascara and lipstick and, most importantly rouge.

Bigotry and xenophobia are American values. Lots of things I dislike intensely are. Yet I'm not going to deny reality or say that those holding them are, ahistorically and counterfactually, not Americans. If we're equal under the law, we're equal. They have the same say in defining America that I do, for good or for bad.

As an aside, my Russian teacher in the '80s was proud that "un-American" like "anti-American" was a nonsense word, primarily associated with the infamous House Un-American Activities Committee. "Anti-Soviet" was blasphemy, it assumed a monolithic view of what Soviet was--a possibility made real by the definitional nature of the CPSU and it's affiliated politico-theocratic organizations that defined politico-historical truth and the One True Interpretation of history and economics. America, he as a naturalized Jewish Soviet refugee was proud to say, had no defining organization. It had some ideals, but no One True Path (vernyi istinnyi put') to get to that Shining Future (svetloe budushchee). Nobody got to define "American values" because in an open, pluralistic, free society like the US nobody was empowered to do so--or, rather, everybody was equally empowered to do so, so nobody properly had sufficient authority to make the claim, and those that did should probably find a market for their excess hubris.

Fr'uim would have have been embarrassed. Pissed off at Trump, pissed off to no end, but embarrassed by all the self-vaunting definers of the One True America and One True We the People.

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
8. Actually its very American as its been done before and for the same reason because people were angry
Sat Jan 28, 2017, 10:02 PM
Jan 2017

and afraid and they let it rule them in making decisions that they know violate some major core principles in both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Booker: Trump ban on admi...