Statisticians fear Trump White House will manipulate figures to fit narrative
Source: Guardian
US statisticians are concerned that Donald Trumps administration might suppress or manipulate public statistics that dont fit his narrative of the truth, the Guardian has learned. In a series of interviews, individuals who have recently left high-level positions at federal statistical agencies expressed worry that the administration may stop collecting and publishing data on subjects such as abortion, racial inequality and poverty.
We should all be starting from the same numbers. I think thats a fear that many of us have at this point - its that picking and choosing your numbers to suit your politics is not the way that we ought to be doing it, said Katherine Wallman, chief statistician of the United States from 1992 to 3 January of this year.
Wallman, like other statisticians the Guardian spoke to, believes that a number system which consists of accurate, publicly available government data is currently under threat.
-snip-
Speaking on the phone in the first days of her retirement, Wallman explained that many new administrations dont necessarily understand the autonomy of the statistical agencies. Other statisticians have described a range of ways in which public data might be influenced by the Trump administration.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/30/statistics-trump-administration-numbers-manipulation
groundloop
(11,519 posts)I dearly hope that the repubs in Congress are smart enough to contain this madman. Unfortunately I'm afraid they'll just play along because he'll gladly rubber stamp their agenda.
Cha
(297,253 posts)Paladin
(28,262 posts)Since when do trump or his goons give half a shit about the truth? Just more "alternate facts" for Conway and Spicer to spew at us.
Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)CincyDem
(6,362 posts)...for the gun lobby. Why not reapply.
WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)manipulating or suppressing numbers/public data isn't a stretch. I'd be much more surprised if they didn't.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)So if things get worse under the same metrics we should use them.
flygal
(3,231 posts)toddwv
(2,830 posts)Trump has the best numbers.
dalton99a
(81,512 posts)TranssexualKaren
(364 posts)The Soviet Union told its people nothing but lies and soon people simply stopped listening to them.
In the same way that real change comes from large crowds of protesters than from the president if the job of finding data falls to citizens and citizen activists we can break out of the paradigm of hoping that some liberal president who has all the answers will come and rescue us....
The revolution will not be televised!!!
EarthFirst
(2,900 posts)We already know that they are willing to present 'alternative facts' to the media.
So what's to keep them from suppressing data and disseminating their own figures to meet the narrative?
riversedge
(70,238 posts)Trumpy just gives a photo op of his signing EO's
From the OP
?w=620&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=b6c835ef58bba39c1f9333c53b6421fd
tclambert
(11,086 posts)No more surveys, no more reports, no more studies, no more sampling or computer modeling, just take the numbers from Donald's latest irrational tweet on the subject. And DO NOT QUESTION our dear leader.
tclambert
(11,086 posts)"And next month, drop it down to 41%. Then 40% the month after. You get the pattern? What do you mean, 'You don't have data from future months yet?' I just gave you the future data."
every.savvy.gal
(3 posts)All of the statistics, the narratives, etc. need to be backed up and kept offline. Going forward, when (not if) we start to see the data changing, then we have proof of intent to hoodwink the PEOPLE. Cooking the books will only backfire on them and then become evidence of criminal intent which can be used as documentation in the impeachment proceedings which are a given. He can't help himself. He's a meglomaniac! And if they truly are removing facts from Obama's page, then the criminal acts have already begun.
All you keepers of the Data, please backup your sources so we have proof to hand off to the Senate Democrats when they go to court.