Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

fountainofyouth

(409 posts)
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 09:59 PM Jan 2017

Hill staffers secretly worked on Trump's immigration order

Source: Politico

Senior staffers on the House Judiciary Committee helped Donald Trump's top aides draft the executive order curbing immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations, but the Republican committee chairman and party leadership were not informed, according to multiple sources involved in the process.

The news of their involvement helps unlock the mystery of whether the White House consulted Capitol Hill about the executive order, one of many questions raised in the days after it was unveiled on Friday. It confirms that the small group of staffers were among the only people on Capitol Hill who knew of the looming controversial policy.

Kathryn Rexrode, the House Judiciary Committee’s communications director, declined to comment about the aides’ work. A Judiciary Committee aide said Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) was not "consulted by the administration on the executive order."

The work of the committee aides began during the transition period after the election and before Donald Trump was sworn in. The staffers signed nondisclosure agreements, according to two sources familiar with the matter. Trump's transition operation forced its staff to sign these agreements, but it would be unusual to extend that requirement to congressional employees. Rexrode declined to comment on the nondisclosure pacts.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-immigration-congress-order-234392

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hill staffers secretly worked on Trump's immigration order (Original Post) fountainofyouth Jan 2017 OP
Something doesn't smell right about this story C_U_L8R Jan 2017 #1
Says these folks were congressional staffers-aides!! How do congressional staff start working riversedge Jan 2017 #3
Nailed it! jeanmarc Jan 2017 #22
Nondisclosure WVGal1963 Jan 2017 #2
Since never. I wonder if he was paying them to moonlight. nt pnwmom Jan 2017 #5
Nondisclosure WVGal1963 Jan 2017 #8
Did you happen to see this? pnwmom Jan 2017 #10
Not Until You Shared It WVGal1963 Jan 2017 #14
No way. This isn't the the private sector JDC Jan 2017 #11
How are these staffers not immediately fired? VMA131Marine Jan 2017 #4
If they do not get fired, OrwellwasRight Jan 2017 #13
Is there a Constitution problem with this? Turbineguy Jan 2017 #6
Doesn't speak very well for the competence or the savvy of those staffers. NT enough Jan 2017 #7
Unless they purposely screwed it up. nt justiceischeap Jan 2017 #9
FOIA the timesheets, the emails, and the White House visitor logs. mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2017 #12
I get that same feeling. This didn't happen overnight. n/t threethirteen Jan 2017 #20
This shouldn't be too hard to figure out. blue neen Jan 2017 #21
"We didn't know about it." One reason Judiciaary Committee is coming forth with this now: zstat Jan 2017 #15
Good investigative reporting! Equinox Moon Jan 2017 #16
tRump needs someone to blame when things go wrong. And things are going wrong. Doitnow Jan 2017 #17
sounds like an episode of the apprentice. KewlKat Jan 2017 #18
So, who are the House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee? blue neen Jan 2017 #19
This has the stank dgibby Jan 2017 #23
Gerrymandering maxrandb Jan 2017 #24

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
1. Something doesn't smell right about this story
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:03 PM
Jan 2017

No adult supervision? Unlikely.
Leadership is just hiding.

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
3. Says these folks were congressional staffers-aides!! How do congressional staff start working
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:06 PM
Jan 2017

for the President elect?? who authorized this? What the hell is going on??

jeanmarc

(1,685 posts)
22. Nailed it!
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:50 AM
Jan 2017

They let Trump borrow some people who had experience and then pretended they knew nothing about it.

WVGal1963

(145 posts)
8. Nondisclosure
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:12 PM
Jan 2017

This is about as worrisome, to me, as anything I have read. This tactic was/is commonplace in the Trump organization. But among our dedicated government career employees? I truly hope this part has some legs and that it gets some media attention if true. Atrocious.

WVGal1963

(145 posts)
14. Not Until You Shared It
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:30 PM
Jan 2017

Our federal employees and appointees take an OATH. An OATH. Nondisclosure agreements have no place in our governance in this country. If this is accurate, let's all hope it starts getting media attention.

JDC

(10,129 posts)
11. No way. This isn't the the private sector
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:21 PM
Jan 2017

Full disclosure is required I thought. Isn't that what the whole HRC email server bs was based on?

VMA131Marine

(4,140 posts)
4. How are these staffers not immediately fired?
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:07 PM
Jan 2017

If I sign an NDA and don't get permission first from my employer I am likely to be out of a job.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
13. If they do not get fired,
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:29 PM
Jan 2017

you best believe this story of that is false and that the Members of Congress knew.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,490 posts)
12. FOIA the timesheets, the emails, and the White House visitor logs.
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:25 PM
Jan 2017

We're paying their salaries; we have a right to know how they're spending their time while on the payroll.

This didn't happen overnight. They've been working on this for a while.

blue neen

(12,322 posts)
21. This shouldn't be too hard to figure out.
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:44 AM
Jan 2017

Non-disclosure statements or not.

24 Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee. Inquiring minds want to know who their staffers are.

zstat

(55 posts)
15. "We didn't know about it." One reason Judiciaary Committee is coming forth with this now:
Mon Jan 30, 2017, 10:34 PM
Jan 2017

Not knowing about it means that they do not have to recuse themselves from the House of Representative vote when it comes time to vote yes/no on impeachment articles. They will "argue" that there is no need to recuse themselves from the vote since they were not part of the decision-making process with the White House. They did not know about it and they were not apart of the process preparing/guiding the language of the order by President Trump. The Judiciary Committee members will then be able to vote their "conscience" and vote according to their sworn responsibility to protect the constitution.

Clever, maybe not.

What a crock?

blue neen

(12,322 posts)
19. So, who are the House Republicans on the Judiciary Committee?
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 12:21 AM
Jan 2017

It would be logical to assume that their aides were the ones helping Trump on his immigration screed, right?

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
23. This has the stank
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:33 PM
Jan 2017

of Bob Goodlatte all over it. As a Virginian who lives near his district, if I were going to investigate this, I'd start with him, denials notwithstanding.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
24. Gerrymandering
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 01:59 PM
Jan 2017

A great deal of these Retrumplicans have had their districts so "effing" Gerrymandered, that there are not enough sane Retrumplicans to save them from the true "nut-sack" Retrumplicans.

Go against Trump and they lose their "effng" seats.

I hate to be "Pollyanish", but by being complacent after Obama's win in 2008, that meant that Retrumplicans had super-majorities to gerrymander the 2010 Census data. We will be paying for that for decades.

The only hope would be that the Retrumplicans would get behind a narcissistic, bloviating, serial "pussy-grabbing", authoritarian, "daily impeachable offense creating" man-child as their leader.

It is going to take a wave election.

It is going to take working and organizing like never before to overcome every voter suppression tactic they can muster.

It is going to take Democrats obstructing every policy of Donnie Short Fingers. Because, by obstructing and standing up for what's right when they have no power...we will know they will stand up for what's right when they do have power

BTW - that's why you obstruct. That's why you don't "settle". I never hear a Retrumplican saying that "both parties are the same", unless they are trying to obfuscate. They KNOW that both parties aren't the same.

It's high-time we realized that too.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hill staffers secretly wo...