Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 01:41 PM Feb 2017

Trump urges Republicans to use nuclear option on Gorsuch vote if Democrats block

Source: Reuters



01 FEB 2017 AT 12:21 ET

President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he would urge Senate Republicans to invoke a rule change to force a simple majority vote on his Supreme Court nominee if Democrats block his choice.

Trump, at a meeting with interest groups who will support his choice of Judge Neil Gorsuch for the high court, was asked whether he would urge Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to use the so-called “nuclear option” to change the rules to make it easier to confirm him.

Trump said if congressional gridlock threatens Gorsuch’s nomination he would say, “If you can, Mitch, go nuclear…I would say, it’s up to Mitch, but I would say, go for it.”

###

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/trump-urges-republicans-to-use-nuclear-option-on-gorsuch-vote-if-democrats-block/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump urges Republicans to use nuclear option on Gorsuch vote if Democrats block (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2017 OP
"If it's nuclear, it's good" dalton99a Feb 2017 #1
Once changed ... could it revert back when it it BENEFITS the GOP? NurseJackie Feb 2017 #2
It would stay. Sours the ground. Nuclear. N/t Action_Patrol Feb 2017 #3
It would stay, but when did this 60 vote thing begin. I'd rather 51 vote for everything yeoman6987 Feb 2017 #4
As Diane Feinstien just said--paraphase--Trump should keep out of the Senate's business! riversedge Feb 2017 #5
Why is the choice between 51 and 60? HoneyBadger Feb 2017 #6
Impeachment numbers jayschool2013 Feb 2017 #7
You better find a lot of states to be with you, because it will take a constitutional amendment onenote Feb 2017 #12
Yah jayschool2013 Feb 2017 #13
If you can't win, then cheat C_U_L8R Feb 2017 #8
It's been their way for ages. One ugly, degenerated crowd of criminals. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2017 #14
Trump loves the idea orangecrush Feb 2017 #9
Then I say the Democrats should boycott Congress altogether 47of74 Feb 2017 #10
I suppose its too much to ask Bayard Feb 2017 #11

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
2. Once changed ... could it revert back when it it BENEFITS the GOP?
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 01:43 PM
Feb 2017

Or would the simple majority requirement be something that would remain in effect forever ... even when/if the Democrats ever regain control?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
4. It would stay, but when did this 60 vote thing begin. I'd rather 51 vote for everything
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 01:52 PM
Feb 2017

That is majority. I believe Reid just went back to what was historical until someone thought 60 sounded nice.

jayschool2013

(2,313 posts)
7. Impeachment numbers
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 01:59 PM
Feb 2017

I say we should need only 190 votes in the House to bring impeachment charges and only 45 votes in the Senate to convict.

Who's with me?

onenote

(42,749 posts)
12. You better find a lot of states to be with you, because it will take a constitutional amendment
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 06:03 PM
Feb 2017

to change the votes needed for impeachment and conviction.

Bayard

(22,128 posts)
11. I suppose its too much to ask
Wed Feb 1, 2017, 05:58 PM
Feb 2017

If any of them see the irony in this. Any way to use this to our advantage? Other than hoping more of the public wises up?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump urges Republicans t...