Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,600 posts)
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:35 PM Mar 2017

House Votes to Restrict EPA's Use of Science

Last edited Thu Mar 30, 2017, 10:16 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: The Hill

House Votes to Restrict EPA's Use of Science

By Timothy Cama - 03/29/17 04:57 PM EDT

The House voted Wednesday to restrict the kind of scientific studies and data that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can use to justify new regulations. ... The Honest and Open New EPA Science Treatment Act, or HONEST Act, passed 228-194. It would prohibit the EPA from writing any regulation that uses science that is not publicly available.

Its the latest push by House Republicans to clamp down on what they say has turned into an out-of-control administrative state that enforces expensive, unworkable regulations that are not scientifically sound.
....

The HONEST Act is similar to the Secret Science Act, which leaders in the House Science Committee sponsored in previous congresses and got passed. ... This legislation ensures that sound science is the basis for EPA decisions and regulatory actions, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the Science Committee, said on the House floor Wednesday. ... The days of trust-me science are over. In our modern information age, federal regulations should be based only on data that is available for every American to see and that can be subjected to independent review, he said. Thats called the scientific method.
....

Republicans on the Science Committee passed* the bill earlier this month, alongside another bill to reform the EPAs Science Advisory Committee. The advisory panel would be required to have geographic diversity and representatives from certain stakeholder groups. ... The full House is likely to consider that bill soon.

* http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/323161-house-committee-passes-two-epa-science-bills

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/326380-house-votes-to-restrict-epas-use-of-science



Hat Tip, Joe.My.God: US House Votes To Curtail EPA’s Use Of Science
http://www.joemygod.com/2017/03/29/us-house-votes-curtail-epas-use-science/

Here's @ungaggedEPA, the #AltGovt EPA Twitter feed:

https://twitter.com/ungaggedEPA

ETA, @altHouseScience

https://twitter.com/altHouseScience
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House Votes to Restrict EPA's Use of Science (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 OP
These people are brain dead bucolic_frolic Mar 2017 #1
Funny that you said that lillypaddle Mar 2017 #4
Unfuckingbelievable lillypaddle Mar 2017 #2
Nice bullshit name. dalton99a Mar 2017 #3
Utterly stupid. And afraid of reality. Because it might interfere with short-term profits. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #5
so on the EPS facebook and twitter site we need to.... samnsara Mar 2017 #6
There just is no Forrest Gump quote for just how stupid this is. Ford_Prefect Mar 2017 #7
WHAT AM I MISSING... its the climate deniers who do junk science, the legit peer-reviewed stuff is Kashkakat v.2.0 Mar 2017 #8
The next step is to make as much science secret as possible. Drug efficacy tests are already secret. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #10
The second bill allows them to stack science review committees with industry & special interests. nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #11
Lamar Smith on the scientific method... dhill926 Mar 2017 #9
March for Science April 22. Over 400 marches, so one is near you. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author LuckyLib Mar 2017 #13
Just cut to the chase and legislate pi to equal three. malthaussen Mar 2017 #14
An additional advantage to that is that instead of Pi Day, we would have Pi Month. NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #15
Any republican bill with 'honest' or 'clean' Kingofalldems Mar 2017 #16
Clearly they don't realize that nothing is accepted by the scientific community until it is... Nitram Mar 2017 #17

lillypaddle

(9,581 posts)
4. Funny that you said that
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:44 PM
Mar 2017

I was just thinking that it's out of a sci-fi movie, or a Twilight Zone episode. They are NOT human.

Ford_Prefect

(7,919 posts)
7. There just is no Forrest Gump quote for just how stupid this is.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:45 PM
Mar 2017

This is way past "stupid does". If they could repeal Gravity I believe they would do it.

Kashkakat v.2.0

(1,752 posts)
8. WHAT AM I MISSING... its the climate deniers who do junk science, the legit peer-reviewed stuff is
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 09:51 PM
Mar 2017

pretty much in consensus re global human caused warming.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,036 posts)
10. The next step is to make as much science secret as possible. Drug efficacy tests are already secret.
Wed Mar 29, 2017, 10:25 PM
Mar 2017

They will try to keep as much taxpayer funded science secret and that goes double for climate science. What they can't keep secret they will cut.

Drug companies do not have to reveal tests that show their drug is useless. All they have to show is that it is safe.

Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)

malthaussen

(17,216 posts)
14. Just cut to the chase and legislate pi to equal three.
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:32 AM
Mar 2017

I for one am tired of dealing with all those pesky decimal points and fractions.

-- Mal

Nitram

(22,877 posts)
17. Clearly they don't realize that nothing is accepted by the scientific community until it is...
Thu Mar 30, 2017, 11:42 AM
Mar 2017

...published. Understanding published research is another matter entirely. It often gets too technical for the average person to understand.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House Votes to Restrict E...