House Votes to Restrict EPA's Use of Science
Last edited Thu Mar 30, 2017, 10:16 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: The Hill
House Votes to Restrict EPA's Use of Science
By Timothy Cama - 03/29/17 04:57 PM EDT
The House voted Wednesday to restrict the kind of scientific studies and data that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) can use to justify new regulations. ... The Honest and Open New EPA Science Treatment Act, or HONEST Act, passed 228-194. It would prohibit the EPA from writing any regulation that uses science that is not publicly available.
Its the latest push by House Republicans to clamp down on what they say has turned into an out-of-control administrative state that enforces expensive, unworkable regulations that are not scientifically sound.
....
The HONEST Act is similar to the Secret Science Act, which leaders in the House Science Committee sponsored in previous congresses and got passed. ... This legislation ensures that sound science is the basis for EPA decisions and regulatory actions, Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the Science Committee, said on the House floor Wednesday. ... The days of trust-me science are over. In our modern information age, federal regulations should be based only on data that is available for every American to see and that can be subjected to independent review, he said. Thats called the scientific method.
....
Republicans on the Science Committee passed* the bill earlier this month, alongside another bill to reform the EPAs Science Advisory Committee. The advisory panel would be required to have geographic diversity and representatives from certain stakeholder groups. ... The full House is likely to consider that bill soon.
* http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/323161-house-committee-passes-two-epa-science-bills
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/326380-house-votes-to-restrict-epas-use-of-science
Hat Tip, Joe.My.God: US House Votes To Curtail EPAs Use Of Science
http://www.joemygod.com/2017/03/29/us-house-votes-curtail-epas-use-science/
Here's @ungaggedEPA, the #AltGovt EPA Twitter feed:
https://twitter.com/ungaggedEPA
ETA, @altHouseScience
https://twitter.com/altHouseScience
bucolic_frolic
(43,286 posts)They cannot think, they cannot even be human.
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)I was just thinking that it's out of a sci-fi movie, or a Twilight Zone episode. They are NOT human.
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)The hits, they just keep coming.
dalton99a
(81,570 posts)HONEST, my ass
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)samnsara
(17,635 posts)....blast them with climate change facts an tweets
Ford_Prefect
(7,919 posts)This is way past "stupid does". If they could repeal Gravity I believe they would do it.
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)pretty much in consensus re global human caused warming.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)They will try to keep as much taxpayer funded science secret and that goes double for climate science. What they can't keep secret they will cut.
Drug companies do not have to reveal tests that show their drug is useless. All they have to show is that it is safe.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)dhill926
(16,355 posts)Fucking kill me...
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
LuckyLib This message was self-deleted by its author.
malthaussen
(17,216 posts)I for one am tired of dealing with all those pesky decimal points and fractions.
-- Mal
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,476 posts)in the title means just the opposite.
Nitram
(22,877 posts)...published. Understanding published research is another matter entirely. It often gets too technical for the average person to understand.