Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,280 posts)
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 07:18 PM Apr 2017

Swalwell dares Trump: Declassify the surveillance documents

Source: Politico





04/05/17 04:54 PM EDT


A Democrat on the House panel investigating Donald Trump’s ties to Russia is issuing an ultimatum: If the president is going to accuse members of the Obama administration of breaking the law, he should prove it.

“If the president wants to say that Susan Rice committed a crime, he has the power to declassify. No one else does,” Rep. Eric Swalwell of California said Wednesday. “So, he could actually show us where the crime was. I don't expect he will, because I think this is just more obstructionism.”

Swalwell’s remarks came after Trump told The New York Times that he believes Rice committed a crime when she reportedly requested the identities of Trump transition aides who were caught up in U.S. surveillance of foreign targets. “It is one of the big stories of our time,” Trump declared.

But Rice, as national security adviser under President Barack Obama, would not have broken the law by making such a request, nor would it necessarily be improper. The identities of U.S. persons caught up in foreign surveillance are typically shielded in intelligence reports, but Rice and other high-ranking officials would have had the legal authority to request that the intelligence agency behind the report “unmask” them.

Rice on Tuesday said in an interview with MSNBC it was "absolutely false" that the Obama administration used intelligence "for political purposes."


.........................................

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/eric-swalwell-donald-trump-susan-rice-declassify-236927









9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PatSeg

(47,567 posts)
2. Poor Susan Rice
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 07:41 PM
Apr 2017

In the past, republicans treated her very poorly and for no good reason. Now they are going after her again. I wonder if they would treat her so badly if she was a man. John McCain said she, "was not very bright" after the Benghazi attack.

mtngirl47

(990 posts)
3. Yes, poor Susan Rice--she was in line for Secretary of State after Hillary
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 08:03 PM
Apr 2017

but that interview where she gave Benghazi talking points made her the first Republican scapegoat for Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.

Now--they will use her again for their propaganda and to change the subject from Russiagate.

riversedge

(70,280 posts)
6. Oh, I think Susan is smart enough to know that Repugs would never let that issue die. She
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 06:22 AM
Apr 2017

have been to the rodeo more than once. But she does what is right.

PatSeg

(47,567 posts)
8. And we all know
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 10:03 AM
Apr 2017

that republicans tend to hate smart women. They are the school yard bullies who never grew up.

cstanleytech

(26,316 posts)
5. Rice needs to also file a slander lawsuit against Trump if its not true as well
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 09:07 PM
Apr 2017

because while the President is largely immune no President enjoys 100% immunity if they did Nixon would not have resigned.

wishstar

(5,271 posts)
7. It's like his claim against Pres Obama though, "he believes it because his news sources said so"
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 07:11 AM
Apr 2017

He seems to be protected from accusations that he is lying and slandering by claiming he is just repeating what was reported in the "news" from Fox and other right wing outlets. No accountability possible with this POS

cstanleytech

(26,316 posts)
9. That isnt as much protection from a lawsuit as you would think especially since he does
Thu Apr 6, 2017, 12:42 PM
Apr 2017

have the ability to see the information and can often order it to be declassified so either he has seen in and is telling the truth or it doesnt exist and he is slandering her in which case she should sue his fucking ass off and not just for a few million.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Swalwell dares Trump: Dec...