Swalwell dares Trump: Declassify the surveillance documents
Source: Politico
04/05/17 04:54 PM EDT
A Democrat on the House panel investigating Donald Trumps ties to Russia is issuing an ultimatum: If the president is going to accuse members of the Obama administration of breaking the law, he should prove it.
If the president wants to say that Susan Rice committed a crime, he has the power to declassify. No one else does, Rep. Eric Swalwell of California said Wednesday. So, he could actually show us where the crime was. I don't expect he will, because I think this is just more obstructionism.
Swalwells remarks came after Trump told The New York Times that he believes Rice committed a crime when she reportedly requested the identities of Trump transition aides who were caught up in U.S. surveillance of foreign targets. It is one of the big stories of our time, Trump declared.
But Rice, as national security adviser under President Barack Obama, would not have broken the law by making such a request, nor would it necessarily be improper. The identities of U.S. persons caught up in foreign surveillance are typically shielded in intelligence reports, but Rice and other high-ranking officials would have had the legal authority to request that the intelligence agency behind the report unmask them.
Rice on Tuesday said in an interview with MSNBC it was "absolutely false" that the Obama administration used intelligence "for political purposes."
.........................................
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/eric-swalwell-donald-trump-susan-rice-declassify-236927
Link to tweet
LOL Lib
(1,462 posts)Stupid begets more stupid.
PatSeg
(47,567 posts)In the past, republicans treated her very poorly and for no good reason. Now they are going after her again. I wonder if they would treat her so badly if she was a man. John McCain said she, "was not very bright" after the Benghazi attack.
mtngirl47
(990 posts)but that interview where she gave Benghazi talking points made her the first Republican scapegoat for Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi.
Now--they will use her again for their propaganda and to change the subject from Russiagate.
PatSeg
(47,567 posts)She probably thought all that crap was behind her.
riversedge
(70,280 posts)have been to the rodeo more than once. But she does what is right.
PatSeg
(47,567 posts)that republicans tend to hate smart women. They are the school yard bullies who never grew up.
cstanleytech
(26,316 posts)because while the President is largely immune no President enjoys 100% immunity if they did Nixon would not have resigned.
wishstar
(5,271 posts)He seems to be protected from accusations that he is lying and slandering by claiming he is just repeating what was reported in the "news" from Fox and other right wing outlets. No accountability possible with this POS
cstanleytech
(26,316 posts)have the ability to see the information and can often order it to be declassified so either he has seen in and is telling the truth or it doesnt exist and he is slandering her in which case she should sue his fucking ass off and not just for a few million.