Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,242 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:26 AM Jun 2017

Four top law firms turned down requests to represent Trump

Source: yahoo




Michael Isikoff


June 6, 2017

Top lawyers with at least four major law firms rebuffed White House overtures to represent President Trump in the Russia investigations, in part over concerns that the president would be unwilling to listen to their advice, according to five sources familiar with discussions about the matter.

The unwillingness of some of the country’s most prestigious attorneys and their law firms to represent Trump has complicated the administration’s efforts to mount a coherent defense strategy to deal with probes being conducted by four congressional committees as well as Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller.

The president’s chief lawyer now in charge of the case is Marc E. Kasowitz, a tough New York civil litigator who for years has aggressively represented Trump in multiple business and public relations disputes — often with threats of countersuits and menacing public statements — but who has little experience dealing with complex congressional and Justice Department investigations that are inevitably influenced by media coverage and public opinion.

..............................................

Among them, sources said, were some of the most high-profile names in the legal profession, including Brendan Sullivan of Williams & Connolly; Ted Olson of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; Paul Clement and Mark Filip of Kirkland & Ellis; and Robert Giuffra of Sullivan & Cromwell.................................................

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/four-top-law-firms-turned-requests-represent-trump-122423972.html



I am glad to see Ted Olson turn Trump down.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Four top law firms turned down requests to represent Trump (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2017 OP
They were probably afraid they wouldn't get paid... Frustratedlady Jun 2017 #1
That was a direct quote from another article. louis-t Jun 2017 #15
This makes me smile Gothmog Jun 2017 #2
A smart lawyer picks his cases Botany Jun 2017 #3
K&R demmiblue Jun 2017 #4
Not surprising Phoenix61 Jun 2017 #5
Can anyone blame them? DFW Jun 2017 #6
Everyone working with Trump loses credibility and prestige. Kablooie Jun 2017 #7
Better call Saul! Jose Garcia Jun 2017 #8
The world's worst client. The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2017 #9
Lot of Republicans are attorneys, why don't any of them 'volunteer' (like Manafort did in campaign) Sunlei Jun 2017 #10
Because they don't work for free jmowreader Jun 2017 #19
Remember when his former tax attorneys admitted that they always made sure wiggs Jun 2017 #11
Lol they are worried they will have to settle for pennies on the dollar Txbluedog Jun 2017 #12
The Biglaw Firms That Said No To Trump mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2017 #13
Is Orly Taitz available? BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #14
I am disappointed that Brendan "Not a Potted Plant" Sullivan turned him down. yellowcanine Jun 2017 #16
Ted Olsen said no DeminPennswoods Jun 2017 #17
I figured Ted would turn him down. I was surprised Paul Clement did. Justice Jun 2017 #18

Frustratedlady

(16,254 posts)
1. They were probably afraid they wouldn't get paid...
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:30 AM
Jun 2017

along with the fact he won't listen and follow instructions.

Probably the reason he doesn't have a true physician.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
15. That was a direct quote from another article.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 01:19 PM
Jun 2017

One of the firms that turned him down: "He doesn't pay and he doesn't listen."

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
5. Not surprising
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:08 AM
Jun 2017

These firms have already made their reputation. Taking on Twitler wouldn't help them and could definitely hurt them because, as cited, he doesn't follow directions.

DFW

(54,408 posts)
6. Can anyone blame them?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:43 AM
Jun 2017

What's the use of a high-profile client if he's never going to pay his bills?

Trump is too much of an egotist to ask a law firm up front to take him on as a pro-bono client, but if his past business record is any indication, that's what he'd end up being, after refusing to pay their bills ("so sue me!&quot . I wouldn't take his IOU for a Big Mac, although, from the looks of him these days, SOMEBODY obviously does.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
7. Everyone working with Trump loses credibility and prestige.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:50 AM
Jun 2017

His lawyers will be the same unless they are already low life sleaze balls.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,735 posts)
9. The world's worst client.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 10:59 AM
Jun 2017

He doesn't listen to his lawyers' advice; says stupid things in public; and doesn't pay - not to mention that any law firm that represents him would probably lose other, more respectable clients and its reputation would take a serious hit.

I can see Trump with a lawyer like "Saul Goodman" - a guy with a lot of bling and no ethics - and no reputation to protect.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
10. Lot of Republicans are attorneys, why don't any of them 'volunteer' (like Manafort did in campaign)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:03 AM
Jun 2017

to 'defend' their president?

wiggs

(7,814 posts)
11. Remember when his former tax attorneys admitted that they always made sure
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:10 AM
Jun 2017

that there was more than one of them in the room with Trump so that there were witnesses to the conversation? So he couldn't later lie about the conversation?

WHY DIDN'T PEOPLE LISTEN TO ALL THE FOLKS--BIOGRAPHERS, CONTRACTORS, FORMER TAX ATTORNEYS, ETC--WHO CAME FORWARD TO WARN US ABOUT WHO THIS GUY IS??

 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
12. Lol they are worried they will have to settle for pennies on the dollar
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:12 AM
Jun 2017

Just because deplorable are enamored with the Grifter Trump family, doesn't mean smart business people are

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,490 posts)
13. The Biglaw Firms That Said No To Trump
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 11:35 AM
Jun 2017
The Biglaw Firms That Said No To Trump

Guess which big firms had no interest in representing the president...

By KATHRYN RUBINO

at 10:31 AM


Justice

(7,188 posts)
18. I figured Ted would turn him down. I was surprised Paul Clement did.
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 03:28 PM
Jun 2017


Paul Clement was at King & Spaulding and they were defending the Defense of Marriage Act - K&S decided they didn't want to defend it any longer - Paul left there and joined the conservative Bancroft PLLC. Last fall Kirkland acquired the firm and he doesn't have that ability anymore - and probably doesn't want to leave K&E although I figured there was at least a 50/50 chance Clement might do so.

I read that Jones Day was close to this president - the WH counsel McGahn is from there as are other lawyers in the WH.
McGahn is more of a campaign finance lawyer - not really a constitutional lawyer. Don't know if any JD lawyers would step in.

Wonder if Alan Dershowitz would join the team if asked. He seems very "helpful" to Trump on cable news. Like he is angling to be part of the team.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Four top law firms turned...