Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 04:57 PM Jun 2017

Minister: Canada will build up its military as the U.S. pulls back from world stage

Source: The Washington Post



By Alan Freeman June 6 at 2:10 PM

OTTAWA — Canada intends to make “a substantial investment” in its military because it can no longer rely on the United States for global leadership in the face of threats posed by terrorist groups or countries like Russia and North Korea, the Canadian foreign minister said Tuesday.

Echoing complaints made recently by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Chrystia Freeland told Canada’s House of Commons that Washington has decided to forfeit its position of leadership on many issues, forcing Canada to invest in its own armed forces to defend liberal democracy.

“The fact that our friend and ally has come to question the very worth of its mantle of global leadership, puts into sharper focus the need for the rest of us to set our own clear and sovereign course,” Freeland said, never mentioning President Trump by name. “To say this is not controversial. It is fact.” But while criticizing U.S. foreign policy, Freeland conceded that Canada has not pulled its weight in terms of its military spending, a criticism that Trump has made of several NATO members, without necessarily singling out Canada. In 2016, Canada spent just over 1 percent of its gross domestic product on its military, half of the 2 percent level that is the goal of the NATO military alliance. In fact, Canada ranks 20th of 28 NATO members in military spending. The United States is No. 1 at 3.6 per cent of GDP.

“On the military front, Canada’s geography has meant that we have always been able to count on American self-interest to provide a protective umbrella beneath which we have found indirect shelter,” she said. But she added that to depend totally on the U.S. protective umbrella would make Canada a “client state.”

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/minister-canada-will-build-up-its-military-as-the-us-pulls-back-from-world-stage/2017/06/06/4c841a22-4ad8-11e7-987c-42ab5745db2e_story.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
2. Good. Glad to see those slackers, along with Germany and others,
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:27 PM
Jun 2017

are finally seeing the error of their ways and will be increasing their military budgets.

This, of course, means that the USA will now reduce IT'S military budget and spend the savings on something more useful, wouldn't you say?




















As a reminder to those few folks who will not get it and threaten to have me beheaded, this is comedy.

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
5. Why is it comedy?
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:00 PM
Jun 2017

Canada should spend more. Germany and the others should spend more. The US should spend dramatically less. NATO was founded when Russia was far more powerful than it is now. The European nations (and Canada) were incredibly weak. None of that is true now.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
6. I just meant it is comedy that the US (republicans) will spend less on the military,
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 06:03 PM
Jun 2017

NOT that other countries have decided to spend more.


 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
3. I hope that the results emphasize how nations spend way too much money on defense as it is..
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:28 PM
Jun 2017

I like that the Minister got a sweet right-jab in on Trump !!

 

Chevy

(1,063 posts)
4. Chrystia Freeland is well versed in Russia
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 05:41 PM
Jun 2017

and is without a doubt Trudeaus best asset. Potential PM in the making.

TomSlick

(11,100 posts)
8. What this means is
Tue Jun 6, 2017, 09:46 PM
Jun 2017

that Canada (and the rest of our allies) have come the realization that the US cannot be relied upon to live up to its commitments. The US President cannot be believed about anything. As a result, neither can the US. Our position in the world has been seriously damaged. If Trump left office today, it would take years for our reputation to be restored.

Beartracks

(12,816 posts)
9. But it kind of reinforces Trump's rhetoric, doesn't it?
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 11:54 AM
Jun 2017

I can see him claiming credit for these other countries stepping up their defense spending, which purportedly was his goal: "getting them to pay their fair share."
Of course, this does nothing to make America great again; it diminishes our prominence and influence, while Trump's unreliability and petulance reduce the respect our Nation receives.

=================

TomSlick

(11,100 posts)
10. I'm sure the President will think he has rhetoric has been confirmed.
Wed Jun 7, 2017, 09:30 PM
Jun 2017

I will even allow that if the most important thing in Trump's mind is to get our allies to spend more on defense, he was successful. However, the most important thing about our relationship with our allies is that we can trust each other. All of our allies know that the US cannot be trusted - to live up to our obligations, to treat our allies with a modicum of respect, or to live up to our obligations. How much the allies are spending on defense is small beer related to trust.

It is all just too much.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Minister: Canada will bui...