To release it to more worthy people

She's very silly for providing a negative report on Russia to a Russian intelligence asset.

Sad, but probably true

What I find interesting is the amount of non-military info that is being "Classified" for no other reason than to keep United States Citizens from being informed. Can an attorney explain to us what gives our government the authority to classify non-military info?

National Security!

At least that's what the government will always claim, especially when releasing such information embarrasses the government!

labeled as classified. This has been identified as a problem many times by the federal gov't itself. What Ms Winner released exposed no sources or methods and seemed actually quite bland, but, of course contained useful information that Americans should have known.

If I to take a guess, I'd guess probably only about 10% of the info carrying a classified lable (from confidential to top secret) actually is stuff that should be and/or needs to be classified.

provides a breakdown.

Section 1.4

It makes very interesting reading

A way to get our government to show cause when they decide to classify material one way or another! (GOOD LUCK ON THAT RIGHT?)