Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pstokely

(10,530 posts)
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 01:41 AM Jul 2012

Claire McCaskill trails GOP candidates in Senate race, poll shows

Source: STL Post-dispatch

McCaskill, the first-term incumbent Democratic senator, trails all three of her likely Republican challengers, according to a new Post-Dispatch/News 4 poll. She would lose to GOP frontrunner John Brunner by 11 percentage points if they were matched up today, the poll found. She would fall to Sarah Steelman or Todd Akin as well, though by smaller margins.

Further, her "unfavorable" rating is higher than her "favorable," and some of her worst numbers are among all-important independent voters.

The poll of 625 registered Missouri voters suggests a key source of McCaskill's problems is her support of President Barack Obama. The Democratic president — who almost won Missouri in 2008, and once considered the state a 2012 tossup — now has a 51 percent negative rating here and a 9-point deficit against Republican challenger Mitt Romney, according to the poll.

"A lot of people are going to hold her accountable for her close ties to the president," said pollster J. Brad Coker of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, which conducted the poll.

Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/claire-mccaskill-trails-gop-candidates-in-senate-race-poll-shows/article_7dc3f2e4-d84e-11e1-a6e2-001a4bcf6878.html



Doesn't Mason-Dixon spew repuke like Rasmussen? She hasn't been running a lot of ads now but she's bought a bunch of air time in October
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Claire McCaskill trails GOP candidates in Senate race, poll shows (Original Post) pstokely Jul 2012 OP
She's a Blue Dog IMO Politicalboi Jul 2012 #1
She's Less of a blue dog than Jay Nixon pstokely Jul 2012 #2
I seriously doubt her... SkyDaddy7 Jul 2012 #11
Oh but they do... humbled_opinion Jul 2012 #18
I don't see this one swinging back again--not this year demwing Jul 2012 #3
A lot of people probably aren't even pay attention to the election this early pstokely Jul 2012 #5
The last incumbent to win this seat was Danforth pstokely Jul 2012 #19
Total BS n/t jaysunb Jul 2012 #4
Fuckn' idiots, they are showing their true racist stripes. They poll says it is her association still_one Jul 2012 #6
The sad fact is ... bucolic_frolic Jul 2012 #10
Would that be white-collar government bonniebgood Jul 2012 #13
Funny how they blame her deficit on Obama and yet Obama does better here than Romney... Drunken Irishman Jul 2012 #7
Problem is since Obama doesn't need MO, Claire won't get as much help pstokely Jul 2012 #9
she seems like a nice person but since 2006 I assumed she'd lose this time. craigmatic Jul 2012 #8
She is not going to the Democratic Convention... FarPoint Jul 2012 #12
But what does she gain going to the convention instead of campainging? pstokely Jul 2012 #15
It's not about the gain....but the appearance of detachment from the Democratic Party. FarPoint Jul 2012 #16
Mealy mouthed Blue Dog indeed... nradisic Jul 2012 #14
That's going to change fast. sofa king Jul 2012 #17

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
11. I seriously doubt her...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 09:50 AM
Jul 2012

being a "Blue Dog" Democrat in MO hurts her at all...If she were running in New York then your claim would have more weight but not in MO or any other Red State.

I find it very ODD how many of my fellow Liberals tend to think being a Blue Dog in a Red State is why certain Democrats in Red States are losing...This makes ZERO sense. Just because we Liberals have a negative view of Blue Dog or Conservative Democrats does not mean Conservatives hold the same view.

humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
18. Oh but they do...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:45 PM
Jul 2012

I know many Conservatives where I work, I also know some moderates that vote Democrat sometimes and Repub other times, the theme with both groups is going like this....

Obama racked up nearly 6 trillion in his first term that is more than Bush spent in 2 terms and Bush had 911, Katrina, two wars and the TARP bailout as well as creating massive government in the form of TSA, Homeland Security, etc.... The fiscal future under Obama's spending plan is bleak, the Senate Democrats have not passed a budget in over three years, there is a fiscal crisis on the horizon and the Senate Democrats do nothing and refuse to even vote on budgets passed by Paul Ryan and Repubs in the House. Claire MacCaskill is to blame for not standing up to Harry Reid...

Next Claire MacCaskill voted for Obamacare, Obamacare is a massive tax as defined by the SCOTUS, Obamacare which isn't even fully implemented will add over 2 trillion to the national debt over its first 10 years and that estimate may increase in time, Obamacare will become just another welfare give away that is going to come back and haunt the middleclass taxpayers as the rich find new ways to avoid the taxman.

I hear it all...... Even though she voted against extending unemployment the right doesn't give a crap she voted for Obamacare and she must be destroyed that's all they know...

still_one

(92,372 posts)
6. Fuckn' idiots, they are showing their true racist stripes. They poll says it is her association
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 01:59 AM
Jul 2012

With the president.

If the repukes win, they deserve to lose their Medicare, social security, and continue to have their jobs off-shored, by their rethugs who started this mess

bucolic_frolic

(43,258 posts)
10. The sad fact is ...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 08:07 AM
Jul 2012

if repukes win, as you put it, they will be safe and secure in their whites only
country clubs living in gated communities in upscale suburbs or rural estates
and have no worries about off-shoring because they hold white collar jobs.
Off-shoring is a good thing to them because it gooses their stock portfolios,
and they prefer defense spending to social spending for the same reason.

bonniebgood

(943 posts)
13. Would that be white-collar government
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 11:48 AM
Jul 2012

jobs. I never understood the term "white collar jobs". would you give an
example?

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
7. Funny how they blame her deficit on Obama and yet Obama does better here than Romney...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 02:11 AM
Jul 2012

For what it's worth, Obama was doing very badly in Missouri through much of the summer four years ago:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/mo/missouri_mccain_vs_obama-545.html#polls

PPP (D) 8/13 - 8/17 750 LV 3.6 50 40 McCain +10

FarPoint

(12,432 posts)
12. She is not going to the Democratic Convention...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 10:04 AM
Jul 2012

That concerns me. My thoughts are........ one is valued by their actions . Is she not in the Senate today as a Democrat? Of course she is...we put her there.

To distance oneself from your support group, your family for fear of being seen as a likeness to that group...well that shows some level of shame and /or one can conclude this person is being deceptive...or fake to ones constituents.

It just looks bad...

FarPoint

(12,432 posts)
16. It's not about the gain....but the appearance of detachment from the Democratic Party.
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:35 PM
Jul 2012

For me...it is a mandatory meeting. Heck, she could go and leave early verse vocally announcing, " I'm not going to the Democratic Convention".

Is she attempting to give the impression she does not care about President Obama? I don't think she thought this through at all. I will support every Democratic candidate, but they need to show up.... let me know they are working as hard as I am for the Party.

nradisic

(1,362 posts)
14. Mealy mouthed Blue Dog indeed...
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 12:15 PM
Jul 2012

Politicalboi said: I know every seat counts, but she did this to herself.

Amen brother.

IMO McCaskill is a mealy mouthed Blue Dog and we are at a point in our politics where real Democrats do not like her and God knows the Republicans won't vote for her, she is screwed. One less seat in the Senate, but do we really need the likes of Claire who vote so many times against their own party...

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
17. That's going to change fast.
Sun Jul 29, 2012, 07:42 PM
Jul 2012

The Republicans have a hard sell on their hands--and it is a sell.

Somehow, they have to convince Republican voters to give up to $3000 in taxes in order to reelect Republicans. They are blocking an extension of the middle class tax cuts right now.

Or, Republican voters can not vote at all and pay themselves.

Ever met a Republican who wouldn't take the money?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Claire McCaskill trails G...