Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,737 posts)
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 12:18 AM Jun 2017

Conservatives near revolt on Senate health care negotiations

Source: Politico

Conservative senators and allied outside groups are on the verge of rebellion against the Senate’s Obamacare repeal effort, potentially derailing delicate negotiations to overhaul the nation’s health care system.

As Obamacare repeal talks enter crunch time with a vote as soon as this month, the Senate bill continues to tilt toward more moderate members of the GOP on keeping some of Obamacare’s regulatory structure and providing a more generous wind-down of the law’s Medicaid expansion. The movement has made Republicans increasingly pessimistic that two critical conservative senators, Mike Lee of Utah and Rand Paul of Kentucky, will be able to vote for the GOP’s ultimate agreement on health care, according to senators and aides.

“I think Lee is a no. And Rand will be a no," said a Republican senator granted anonymity to discuss sensitive internal conference matters.

Losing those two senators would be a major blow that would allow Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell no further defections in his 52-senator majority and make Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska the key swing votes, further imperiling conservatives’ negotiating position in a Senate in which McConnell needs 50 votes at a minimum.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/09/health-care-bill-conservative-senators-revolt-239364

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives near revolt on Senate health care negotiations (Original Post) brooklynite Jun 2017 OP
Surely Ted Cruz would never grandstand at his party's expense nt geek tragedy Jun 2017 #1
oh really Skittles Jun 2017 #2
This is following the exact line of the House negotiations, OnDoutside Jun 2017 #3
I am worried B Stieg Jun 2017 #5
At least you're in California, so you have a Dem government OnDoutside Jun 2017 #6
Thanks! I'm looking right now. B Stieg Jun 2017 #7
But if the Senate bill becomes more "moderate" and only loses "2" GOP votes BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #8
I'm saying they are following the same line as what the OnDoutside Jun 2017 #10
Sure they can follow the same tactics BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #11
Fair comment, thanks for your perspective. OnDoutside Jun 2017 #12
I can only cross fingers that this will help gum up the works. BumRushDaShow Jun 2017 #13
Instead of Just Throwing The Frog videohead5 Jun 2017 #4
In the end, their plan will be simple.. mountain grammy Jun 2017 #9

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
3. This is following the exact line of the House negotiations,
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 03:55 AM
Jun 2017

People should be very worried. They seem intent on a scorched earth policy as regards anything associated with Obama, just so they can say We Repealed Obamacare. Knowing the ignorance of their voters, they might well calculate that they could cut off their healthcare and those idiots would still vote for them.

B Stieg

(2,410 posts)
5. I am worried
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 04:42 AM
Jun 2017

Just lost my job and great health care and am headed for Obamacare, with three pre-conditions, here in Cali.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
6. At least you're in California, so you have a Dem government
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 04:51 AM
Jun 2017

who will work against anything they try.

I hope you get work soon. Best of luck.

BumRushDaShow

(129,493 posts)
8. But if the Senate bill becomes more "moderate" and only loses "2" GOP votes
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 06:43 AM
Jun 2017

do you even think the 30-some member teabaggers ("Freedom Caucus&quot in the House will go along with that new, less draconian result? The Senate took the House bill (that lost most if not all the House moderates - which have less members than the teabaggers and their co-chair eventually resigned as a chair due to the push-back to his "compromise&quot , declared it DOA, and reworked it.

You do know that whatever the Senate "passes" has to go back to the House, right?

Am not saying that this is impossible but right now, it is difficult because they are so hyper-partisan within their own ranks.

OnDoutside

(19,972 posts)
10. I'm saying they are following the same line as what the
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 09:26 AM
Jun 2017

House Reps did. Which one of us seriously thought they would vote through what they did ? If they can do it there, the Senate Reps can do it too. It's too important to think they wouldn't try, and in fact you can see they clearly are trying.

BumRushDaShow

(129,493 posts)
11. Sure they can follow the same tactics
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 11:21 AM
Jun 2017

but that doesn't automatically make their different bills "the law'. They have to reconcile them and then go back through the vote process again.... And the timeframe for them to do that has grown short considering how they wanted it all done before their August recess (and they WILL be taking their August recess in order to come back in September with just a few weeks to get the 2018 appropriations taken care of or the government will shut down - let alone deal with the debt ceiling that has "gone missing" out of the media as "an issue", like they made it an issue multiple times under Obama). They will be on "vacation" that July 4th week as it is (which is why Turtle wanted their bill done before then).

There is a significant difference between the House and Senate in terms of numbers of members in each party and how much leeway they have for passing legislation without Democratic party votes. The House could lose no more than 25 House members for their AHCA in order to get to 217 and they were able to whittle it down to 20 to get enough margin to barely pass it. The Senate threshold is much closer and even if their version passes somehow, it would probably be "too liberal" for the teabaggers in the House, and the moderates in the House feeling even MORE pressure through Town Halls, may throw up their hands entirely (especially after what happened with MacArthur and his screw job of the rest of the GOP swing district moderates).

For "P.R." purposes, each chamber could claim to have "passed a repeal/replace bill" and also claim "but the Democrats blocked it", banking on their base not knowing how a bill becomes the law.

videohead5

(2,181 posts)
4. Instead of Just Throwing The Frog
Sun Jun 11, 2017, 04:08 AM
Jun 2017

In the boiling water they are going to take years to wind down Medicaid expansion.it could take 5-7 years.they think this is going work to keep their fannies out of trouble but when millions of people know they are still going to lose their health insurance down the road they will still be in big trouble.the CBO score will tell the tale.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservatives near revolt...