Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,091 posts)
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 10:21 AM Jun 2017

Supreme Court sides with Missouri church in major church-state decision over use of public funds

Source: Washington Post

Trinity Lutheran Church in Columbia, Mo., wanted to participate in a state program that reimbursed the cost of rubberizing the surface of playgrounds. But the state said that was not allowed. The exclusion raised big questions about how to uphold the Constitutions prohibition on government support for religion without discriminating against those who are religious.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

UPDATE:

The Supreme Court concluded its work for this session on Monday siding with religious institutions in a major church-state decision. The court ruled 7-2 that religious institutions may not be excluded from state programs with a secular intent — in this case, making playgrounds safer.

Missouri’s state constitution, like those in about three dozen states, forbade government from spending any public money on “any church, sect, or denomination of religion.”

Trinity Lutheran Church in Columbia, Mo., wanted to participate in a state program that reimburses the cost of rubberizing the surface of playgrounds. But the state said that was not allowed. The exclusion has raised big questions about how to uphold the Constitution’s prohibition on government support for religion without discriminating against those who are religious.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/06/26/supreme-court-sides-with-missouri-church-in-major-church-state-decision-over-use-of-public-funds/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

woodsprite

(11,916 posts)
3. I can see this being the case if the playground is at any time used for
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 11:28 AM
Jun 2017

programs which are open to the community or for a daycare that is state licensed, even one that is held in the church.

BumRushDaShow

(129,091 posts)
5. I think that was the thrust
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 11:32 AM
Jun 2017

I.e., if the playground is not restricted for use by only that religious org's members - it is open to all.

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
4. Sorry Bum, There's a Dup of this on the front page that isn't going away
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 11:30 AM
Jun 2017

due to being posted by a host I'm supposing..

Pretty weird.

lark

(23,105 posts)
9. Supreme Court got it wrong, not unusual.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 12:43 PM
Jun 2017

With asswipe Gorsuch in place, rulings like this will keep coming. they will advantage churches, ahem, Christian churches only of course, every single way they can. They want to destroy public education so they will continue to push the religious version so they can destroy the ability of the poor to be informed.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
10. Illegitimate activist court re-writes 1st amendment.
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 12:56 PM
Jun 2017

Robert's illegitimate supreme court establishes state funding of false religion. Now taxpayers are forced to fund religious institutions that do not follow God. This is against MY religion. You know like how they refuse to allow state funding of abortions. False religions just won't give up the control of human beings that they've "enjoyed" for millennia.

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
11. As I understand it, private non-religious schools also applied for and received these
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:35 PM
Jun 2017

funds. It was not about funding schools or churches but about playground safety for children.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court sides with ...