Senate Bill Opens Door For States To Use Medicaid Funds On Roads, Bridges, Stadiums
Source: Talking Points Memo
By TIERNEY SNEED Published JUNE 27, 2017 12:09 PM
Language tucked deep in the Medicaid provisions of the Senate GOP Obamacare repeal legislation appears to allow states to funnel leftover Medicaid money for use on roads, bridges, stadiums and other projects not directly related to Medicaids traditional definition.
A GOP aide is already walking back the language, telling the Washington Post on Monday that it was an inadvertent error and that the language would be fixed before a final bill is filed for a vote.
Yet health care experts say that language points to the larger problems posed if states take congressional Republicans up on their offer to convert Medicaids structure into a lump sum system under the Senate GOP bill. Theres all kinds of things that are wrong here, including this flexibility to use it for things that are not covered under Medicaid, Judy Solomon, vice president for health policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told TPM.
The language appears on pages 93-95 of the Better Care Reconciliation Act, in a section giving states the option to take their Medicaid funding in what is known as a block grant. States also can choose a so-called per capita cap system, in which the feds set a limit on their Medicaid contribution on a per enrollee basis.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/senate-bill-medicaid-funding-roads-bridges-stadiums
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,123 posts)the money was supposed to be used for prevention and other measures. Yet a number of states ended up diverting a chunk of it to plug holes in their budgets.
I can imagine a "block grant" in this case would be a boon to states like Kansas with massive budget shortfalls (forget using it for actual medical care).
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,786 posts)for anything. Such as funding for Medicaid. I knew all along that the GOP would do this. Allowing states more control over Medicaid funding would lead to ABUSE. Thus leaving vulnerable people out in the cold when our TAX funded monies were handed out and NOT USED for the intended purpose.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)CrispyQ
(36,478 posts)My outrage meter has been in the red zone since November.
Delphinus
(11,831 posts)If they used it correctly there would NEVER be any money leftover for anything.