Trump nominee Sam Clovis: 'As far as we know' homosexuality's a choice, 'logical' LGBT protections c
Source: CNN
Updated 11:59 AM ET, Mon August 21, 2017
Story highlights
Clovis has argued that homosexuality is a choice and that the sanctioning of same-sex marriage could lead to the legalization of pedophilia.
A USDA spokeswoman told CNN: "The Supreme Court settled the issue in 2015."
(CNN)Sam Clovis, Donald Trump's pick to be chief scientist for the Department of Agriculture, has argued that homosexuality is a choice and that the sanctioning of same-sex marriage could lead to the legalization of pedophilia, a CNN KFile review of Clovis' writings, radio broadcasts, and speeches has found.
Clovis made the comments between 2012 and 2014 in his capacity as a talk radio host, political activist, and briefly as a candidate for US Senate in Iowa. His nomination has drawn criticism from Senate Democrats, who argue his lack of scientific background makes him unqualified for the USDA post overseeing science.
Clovis has repeatedly argued that the science on homosexuality is unsettled and that "LGBT behavior" is a choice. The American Psychological Association has said that while there is no scientific consensus on the causes of sexual orientation, "most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation."
...................................
Writing in an op-ed for the local conservative blog Iowa Republican in April 2011, Clovis argued science of being LGBT was unsettled and if being gay was genetic, then other people genetically-disposed like left-handed people should receive constitutional protections as well.........................
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/21/politics/kfile-sam-clovis-lgbt-comments/index.html
This man is nominated as CHIEF SCIENTIST!!!!! let that sink in! and call your senators!!
FULL TITLE:
Trump nominee Sam Clovis: 'As far as we know' homosexuality's a choice, 'logical' LGBT protections could lead to legalization of pedophilia
PHOTO FROM STORY:
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Archae
(46,328 posts)Being gay is inborn.
Being a fat swine is a choice.
(As opposed to an overweight guy.)
Docreed2003
(16,861 posts)Fuck this dude
shraby
(21,946 posts)niyad
(113,323 posts)does the orange asshole know ANYBODY who is intelligent and decent and honourable??? and actually truly qualified for the positions for which he nominates them?
RoBear
(1,188 posts)WE know no such thing...
How does this singularly unattractive degenerate breathe with his head up his ass?
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)and he probably struggles with his own pedophilia, projecting his feelings like the rest of them.
J_William_Ryan
(1,753 posts)it's not "logical," it fails as a slippery slope fallacy.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)dumb
hates all minorities
dumb
dumb
Trump does this on purpose to anger minorities and to harm them. Right now the president of the USA is trying to kill over 100 million Americans by my last count.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)broadcaster90210
(333 posts)Choice or "born that way" ... who cares? You are what you are, you do what you do, you love who you love. Consenting adults is all that matters.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)And it's precisely because ... this asshole does make a somewhat valid point, albeit from a purely rhetorical point of view.
What I mean by that is ... yes ... IF the ONLY justification needed for some behavior, ANY behavior ... to be 'legalized' ... is that the person is 'born that way' ... then by logical extension, if it's ever shown that pedophilia, or being a homicidal maniac, or always driving your car with your accelerator pressed to the floor, or WHATEVER ... is a 'genetic condition' ... then we'd be obliged as a society to make that behavior legal for such people ...
IF that were the sole justification for the legality of same-sex relations, he'd be 'right'. IOW, that point IS, as he says, a 'logical extension of (that particular) thought'.
Ergo, I always say ... the FAR MORE important 'point' ... is that as long as same-sex relations (just like hetero-sex relations) involves consenting adults (or similarly-aged youth) ... there's nothing inherently 'wrong' about it! Why should gay people have to prostrate themselves to the hetero-majority, essentially reduced to blubbering 'bu...bu...but...you know, it's really not my fault, I was born this way!'.
I say: fuck that!
Don't get me wrong, I very much believe that the vast majority of people who practice same-sex relations were 'born inclined to do so', that's really not WHY ... say, gay marriage and/or sex ... should be 100% legal. It's because it's a free country and it's nobody else's damn business who we marry or sleep with, and it harms nobody else.
Pedophilia ... does.
So where assholes like Clovis go 'way wrong', is that even if it does turn out people are 'born pedo', we as a society will not be obliged to condone nor allow it ... based on our previous collective decision about grown-ups in same-sex relations. THAT ... is a bullshit argument.
Amaryllis
(9,524 posts)that's really irrelevant. As you say, consenting adults is all that matters, choice or not.
onetexan
(13,041 posts)disgraceful!
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)I'd also ask him when he chose to be heterosexual.
Bob Loblaw
(1,900 posts)-- Sgt. Schultz
sarisataka
(18,656 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)by eating at the Hungry Heifer
IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)as much as possible, as stupidly as possible, and believe in insanity.
Helping the allies win WW2 wasn't enough to prevent chemical castration of Alan Turing for his horrible crimes of being homosexual. Some people want to take us back to that level of greatness.
Astraea
(468 posts)there is something seriously wrong with you.
TomVilmer
(1,832 posts)As chief scientist for the Department of Agriculture he can stop the danger of all the frogs turning gay:
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/5/31/1667566/-ALEX-JONES-AND-THE-CASE-FOR-GAY-FROGS
Behind the Aegis
(53,959 posts)The homo/transphobia and heterosexism of this administration is often overlooked, but it is quite prevalent.