Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 09:43 AM Aug 2017

Trump responds to Ingraham: We're trying to shrink government

Source: Politico




By LOUIS NELSON 08/29/2017 09:10 AM EDT

President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the understaffing of the executive branch under his administration has been a conscious choice as part of a larger effort to shrink government, pushing back against conservative commentator Laura Ingraham, who told Fox News that the federal government is short on manpower.

In an interview Tuesday morning on “Fox & Friends,” Ingraham noted that FEMA Administrator Brock Long, the man overseeing the federal response to the storm damage and flooding in Texas from Hurricane Harvey, has only been in his position since June. The storm, recovery from which Long said will take years, along with a full plate of other domestic and international issues to deal with, are proof that the Trump administration needs to be fully staffed, Ingraham said.

“We can all look at these horrific pictures, and we can conclude that a federal government does need staff. We see it acutely in need of staff in a situation like this,” Ingraham said. “This isn't the only crisis we're facing. This is massive, humanitarian. We're also facing a huge crisis with North Korea. We're facing a crisis of confidence across the country where people wonder even with President Trump in, he said he was going to drain the swamp, can we have a government that works for the people and not just have a people enslaved to the government.”

Trump, known to be a regular “Fox & Friends” viewer, responded to Ingraham on Twitter, writing that “we are not looking to fill all of those positions. Don't need many of them - reduce size of government.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/29/trump-shrink-government-laura-ingraham-242128

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump responds to Ingraham: We're trying to shrink government (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2017 OP
Let's start at the White House. muntrv Aug 2017 #1
Yep,,,, Cryptoad Aug 2017 #11
"Shrink government?" yallerdawg Aug 2017 #2
Right. sandensea Aug 2017 #4
I don't want to abolish government... forgotmylogin Aug 2017 #5
u see the GOP movers and shakers saved bigly $ Cryptoad Aug 2017 #12
like State and its diplomacy Dept has been shrunk down to a few- Floors are empty at State. GUNS riversedge Aug 2017 #3
In Trump's defense, he has his priorities left-of-center2012 Aug 2017 #6
Perhaps now all those stupid, ignorant pangaia Aug 2017 #7
Now they are in the swamp and their savior DK504 Aug 2017 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author turbinetree Aug 2017 #8
So, now tRUMP figured out a name for his non-existent work ethics & policies SWBTATTReg Aug 2017 #10
"We aren't looking to fill them because we can't find anybody who wants to work for my administratio MiniMe Aug 2017 #13
These people want a return to a feudal serf system. SweetieD Aug 2017 #14
"I meant to do that!!!" Thor_MN Aug 2017 #15
Everybody's a socialist when it comes to disasters. MGKrebs Aug 2017 #16

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
11. Yep,,,,
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 12:45 PM
Aug 2017

seems like any thing that services the bottom 47% has got to go,,,,,, u r right start at the Whitehouse

sandensea

(21,635 posts)
4. Right.
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 09:59 AM
Aug 2017

It's always just code for cutting everything and anything - including emergency contingencies - that doesn't benefit either their bankrollers or the war profiteers.

They're about as fascist as you can get, and still be within democratic parameters.

forgotmylogin

(7,528 posts)
5. I don't want to abolish government...
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 10:27 AM
Aug 2017

“I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
--Grover Norquist

Trump's headed to a big ol' bathtub in Houston.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
12. u see the GOP movers and shakers saved bigly $
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 12:51 PM
Aug 2017

by building 8 of its 911 command centers in the Flood Plain, plus a GOP Oligarchs made a fortune selling some ole swamp land!

Thats why the GOP battle cry is "Shelter in Place", they have cluster fucked it up so bad they can not communicate and get people to move,,,,,,, not enough roads built above flood plain,,,,,, guess who made those decisions

riversedge

(70,218 posts)
3. like State and its diplomacy Dept has been shrunk down to a few- Floors are empty at State. GUNS
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 09:56 AM
Aug 2017

and war equipment are a priority.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
7. Perhaps now all those stupid, ignorant
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 11:25 AM
Aug 2017

self-centered republicans who voted for trumper because he would drain the swamp, are going to find out what a minimal fascist government really is.

Maybe NOW they will learn just what Norquist meant.


Fuck 'em all.

Response to DonViejo (Original post)

SWBTATTReg

(22,124 posts)
10. So, now tRUMP figured out a name for his non-existent work ethics & policies
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 12:24 PM
Aug 2017

Again, tRUMP has proved he isn't fit to be commander-in-chief. Just now, in response to Ingraham's remarks on under-staffing on Faux News, tRUMP had to respond that the under-staffing issues were deliberate, due to tRUMP's 'don't need many of them - reduce size of government' policies? Really??? I doubt anyone with any competence will believe tRUMP's lame ass excuse, especially at this late point in time.

Also, he attempted to blame Congress for some of his failures. Earlier this year, tRUMP has griped at Congress for failing to approve his nominees (to which Congress had responded, what nominees? (they were no nominees awaiting approval)).

This is clear and undeniable evidence that tRUMP is failing miserably in the performance of his duties as commander-in-chief. Because of his ongoing failure to promptly fill or merge federal job slots (the responsibilities handled by the unfilled federal jobs hasn't gone away), more and more evidence of his incompetence will start to show.

Unfortunately, his failure to fulfill many of the overseas ambassador slots and state department slots (Rex T.) will come back to negatively impact US relations in so many ways, we can't begin to imagine all of the consequences. So much for tRUMP's world view, eh?

So far, tRUMP's coming up w/ fake or made up excuses on his performance (what performance?), attempted to place blame on others for his failures (blaming everybody for his failures in Congress to pass anything), lied repeatedly to the American public (he calls it 'fake news' when he's caught with his hand in the cookie jar, e.g., lying to us), and attempted to equate his pardon w/ those of other presidents (failing miserably by comparing the actions of a convicted racist sheriff with the pardons of other prior presidents, e.g., Manning, etc.).

He's lost Congress now in any support for anything. He's lost the majority of the American public. He's losing most of his legal challenges. Mueller is coming. As to campaigning for a 2nd term, what a joke...another way to scam the American public...he's raking in tons of dough, while claiming it's for a second term run at the presidency. It's fraud, plain and simple.

He's pocketing the money for solely his own benefit/income. Eventually he's going to run out of places to run to/hide, when he wants to escape the continual and ongoing criticism of his administration and policies. All fake!

Congress, controlled by Republicans, has been complacent in allowing tRUMP the leeway they've given him, for they finally got control of both houses of Congress, and clearly favoring party over country, will attempt to enact a revamped tax code, and other policies, which will spell disaster for this country (look at the attempt by republicans in the state of KS's revamped tax codes, an utter disaster).

People understand and realize what the Republican party really stands for (billionaires and millionaires, and businesses, who don't want to pay any taxes at all), and will attempt to cling to control by using 'red button' issues to divert and obscure the truth. NO MORE.

Candidates desired by the majority of democrats and independents will emerge, in 2018 and 2020, who will be fully capable of dealing w/ the idiotic campaign and candidate that tRUMP will be. After all, anyone who has spent more time eating two scoops of ice cream and chocolate cake, playing golf, and vacationing (while NOT doing his job), is going to have a difficult time defending his record.

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)
13. "We aren't looking to fill them because we can't find anybody who wants to work for my administratio
Tue Aug 29, 2017, 01:01 PM
Aug 2017

Nobody wants to work for that man.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump responds to Ingraha...