Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin
Source: CNN
A number of Russian-linked Facebook ads specifically targeted Michigan and Wisconsin, two states crucial to Donald Trump's victory last November, according to four sources with direct knowledge of the situation.
Some of the Russian ads appeared highly sophisticated in their targeting of key demographic groups in areas of the states that turned out to be pivotal, two of the sources said. The ads employed a series of divisive messages aimed at breaking through the clutter of campaign ads online, including promoting anti-Muslim messages, sources said.
It has been unclear until now exactly which regions of the country were targeted by the ads. And while one source said that a large number of ads appeared in areas of the country that were not heavily contested in the elections, some clearly were geared at swaying public opinion in the most heavily contested battlegrounds.
Michigan saw the closest presidential contest in the country -- Trump beat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by about 10,700 votes out of nearly 4.8 million ballots cast. Wisconsin was also one of the tightest states, and Trump won there by only about 22,700 votes. Both states, which Trump carried by less than 1%, were key to his victory in the Electoral College.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.html
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)How Clinton lost Michigan and blew the election
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/michigan-hillary-clinton-trump-232547
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)had nothing to do with Clinton losing Michigan?
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Russians put propanganda into our media through social media and their outlets: RT, Sputnik.
Into ALL our media.
Look at how they are attempting to polarize Americans over the Vegas shooting.
FakeNoose
(32,748 posts)If you HAVE to go on Facebook, never read a news story or an advertisment that's been made to look like a news story.
Never click on any ad you see on Facebook. Never click on something that COULD be an ad or it COULD be a fake news story, but you're not sure. (It probably is fake news, so don't click on it.)
Get out of Facebook as quickly as possible and get back to safety on DU.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Apps have way more power than websites. For example the Facebook app tracks your location and saves it.
FakeNoose
(32,748 posts)But some people need to be told anyway, so thanks!
Pugster
(229 posts)Against the study.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I too make a quick stop at anything which invalidates my biases...
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)I met Trump idiot voters and usually they go to those kind of propaganda outlets when asking for information.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)have an email address, if that. Hell, I think I have one buy only used it for coupons or something or other.
pnwmom
(108,994 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)pnwmom
(108,994 posts)You said that the people who didn't vote for Hillary aren't connected to Facebook and the other social media that Russia used.
I am saying you have no evidence. The only way you can logically prove me wrong is to provide such evidence.
Still waiting.
LisaM
(27,830 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 4, 2017, 07:02 AM - Edit history (1)
and forwarded them. So yeah, there are plenty of rank and file voters in Michigan with Facebook accounts who went for Trump.
You can also look at the voting machine issue in Detroit.
Interstate CrossCheck = stealing the right to vote.
IIRC many more voters were spuriously purged from the voting rolls than the number by which Secretary Clinton "lost" in e.g. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Redux of what happened in Flori-duh when chimpy got installed. His brother and katherine harris purged 10s of thousands of African Americans before that stolen election. The pukes have just perfected their strategy now.
Also, how did the russians know which states to target? Because the dump campaign was colluding with them by giving them GOPee voter district information. Bet that comes out in the Mueller investigation.
pnwmom
(108,994 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)pnwmom
(108,994 posts)2/3 of US adults use Facebook, and 2/3 of them get their news on Facebook.
You have no evidence that the people who didn't vote for Hillary in Michigan are any different from other voters with respect to their use of social media.
http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/05/pew-report-44-percent-of-u-s-adults-get-news-on-facebook/
certainot
(9,090 posts)talk radio, with putin's crew piggybacking 25 years of clinton swiftboating and dems continuing the giant fail of ignoring talk radio because it hurts thinking people's ears, had a hell of a lot more to do with it than 'white working man's economic angst'
and look at the money - 24 limbaugh stations in wisc and mich depend on 4 major universities that need to reread their mission statements.
19 Michigan St. 11, Michigan 7, Western Michigan 1
uni of Wisconsin 5
and look at what that's worth-
at a cheap $1000/hr x 15hrs/day x 5 = $75,000/wk x 24 stations rw talk radio is worth $1.8MIL/week or 7.2MIL$ /month free for trump
when dems and the analysts analyze what happened they might want to do some simple math. apparently putin's guys did.
dems don't even poll trump support for talk radio, and if they did they'd probably find putins facebook ads did a lot of piggybacking.
that's probably why trumps guys studied talk radio in 2014 (ny magazine, gabriel sherman 4/3/16)
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)That politico article came out BEFORE the Russia evidence
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Which is the topic of the CNN article linked in op.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)she thought she had Michigan in the bag, ignored us and she didn't.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)In fact is certainly IS both - certainly multiple failings can be involved when a race is so close.
In this case, she could have won by working harder in MI. OR if the Russians had stayed out.
I tend to get a lot more worked up about foreign intelligence services intervening in our election.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)It's irrational to believe one causal factor denies another causal factor.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)Right wing billionaires have been smearing the Clintons for two decades. The smear front Judicial Watch alone spent $500M over that time.
Also Maggie haberman alone at the NYT probably had a bigger effect on Michigan votes than the effects listed in that article.
Hillary is a great politician and candidate. She is not ideally suited to modern media and she is too hawkish for me. Read her book for more details.
Pugster
(229 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Pugster
(229 posts)It's understandable that you feel compelled to underestimate the help Russia gave Trump, because otherwise you would be acknowledging that Russian propaganda worked (in favor of both Trump and Sanders and against Hillary).
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Nate Silver is still wearing that "egg".
Pugster
(229 posts)Give me that bottle, please. You've had enough.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)pnwmom
(108,994 posts)and Hillary lost Michigan by less than 11K votes. So that article is next to worthless as a source today.
The difference in the election results was so small that any one of several things -- including Russian propaganda -- could have been enough to toss the election to DT.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,036 posts)The Russian interference was a contributing factor, perhaps enough to tip the balance.
This set of ads was one of many on many different media.
If she had won by a similar margin, Politico et al would be running articles "How Clinton took Michigan — and won the election".
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)"In results that narrow, Clintons loss could be attributed to any number of factors FBI Director Jim Comeys letter shifting late deciders, the lack of a compelling economic message, the apparent Russian hacking. "
FailureToCommunicate
(14,020 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,627 posts)The fake prez spent most of his campaign budget ($85 million) on Facebook and wouldn'the have won without them. Between Russia and his campaign no one else stood a chance.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029595857
This says it all! Facebook, Cambridge Analytical, etc.
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Crazy, eh?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)DeminPennswoods
(15,290 posts)In the election, Democrats won ALL the state row offices (Atty General, Treasurer, Aud General), so Pennsylvanians were not averse to electing Dems statewide. Josh Shapiro, who was elected Atty Gen and got more total votes than any other candidate on the ballot, won counties Clintons lost. Had Shapiro voters also voted for Clinton, she'd have won the state.
I'm sure some voters were influenced by Russian ads on facebook, but there were plenty of voters who just didn't like and/or didn't connect with Clinton.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)An exception apart from other Dems and a pariah to Republicans. So I don't see why you'd say that. The PA people I saw were pushing CTs from Sputnik and what looked like real newspapers but werent.
C Moon
(12,221 posts)It was strange watching how Ryan nervously shifted from being against Trump, to supporting Trump.
It made me suspicious when I saw it happen. But I was thinking it was more in the line of promises from Trump.
Now I'm beginning to wonder if it was something on a larger scale.
SunSeeker
(51,691 posts)JI7
(89,264 posts)even when authorities said the guy was local and the ones they were accusing were not from there it was still all over the internet.
now they are convincing themselves it's some liberal conspiracy to make white men look bad.