Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:17 PM Oct 2017

Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin

Source: CNN

A number of Russian-linked Facebook ads specifically targeted Michigan and Wisconsin, two states crucial to Donald Trump's victory last November, according to four sources with direct knowledge of the situation.

Some of the Russian ads appeared highly sophisticated in their targeting of key demographic groups in areas of the states that turned out to be pivotal, two of the sources said. The ads employed a series of divisive messages aimed at breaking through the clutter of campaign ads online, including promoting anti-Muslim messages, sources said.

It has been unclear until now exactly which regions of the country were targeted by the ads. And while one source said that a large number of ads appeared in areas of the country that were not heavily contested in the elections, some clearly were geared at swaying public opinion in the most heavily contested battlegrounds.

Michigan saw the closest presidential contest in the country -- Trump beat Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by about 10,700 votes out of nearly 4.8 million ballots cast. Wisconsin was also one of the tightest states, and Trump won there by only about 22,700 votes. Both states, which Trump carried by less than 1%, were key to his victory in the Electoral College.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.html

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian-linked Facebook ads targeted Michigan and Wisconsin (Original Post) MelissaB Oct 2017 OP
Clinton lost Michigan all on her own and it had nothing to do with Russian ads. eom Purveyor Oct 2017 #1
Wow! So Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Jared Kushner MelissaB Oct 2017 #2
The voters she lost in Michigan don't live in the "Facebook" world... nt Purveyor Oct 2017 #4
Harvard study: fake stories influenced CNN sharedvalues Oct 2017 #7
I stopped at the "Harvard Study"... nt Purveyor Oct 2017 #11
Fake russian stories influenced CNN, NYT, etc. sharedvalues Oct 2017 #14
The solution is to never go on Facebook FakeNoose Oct 2017 #25
And do not install apps sharedvalues Oct 2017 #32
Yep that goes without saying FakeNoose Oct 2017 #36
You stopped because you have no argument Pugster Oct 2017 #16
Hard to say, as I said...stopped at "Harvard Study". Purveyor Oct 2017 #18
I too make a quick stop at anything which invalidates my biases... LanternWaste Oct 2017 #47
Clearly they do. They fell for the Russian puppet and their propaganda. rockfordfile Oct 2017 #20
The rank and file voters she lost here in MI do not have Facebook accounts and barely Purveyor Oct 2017 #21
You don't have one bit of evidence to support that. nt pnwmom Oct 2017 #30
And you haven't one bit of evidence to prove otherwise. Eom Purveyor Oct 2017 #31
You are the one who made the original claim and you can't support it. pnwmom Oct 2017 #34
I am from Michigan and I know people who fell for those ads LisaM Oct 2017 #35
Plus not fooled Oct 2017 #42
Nonsense. Few people don't live in the Facebook/Twitter/Reddit/4chan world. n/t pnwmom Oct 2017 #26
You forgot the sarcasm thingy... Eom Purveyor Oct 2017 #28
No, I think you missed it in your posts. pnwmom Oct 2017 #33
no, they live in limbaugh/talk radio world - and that's why the politico analysis is also bullshit certainot Oct 2017 #37
False in general. You think Russian intervention had nothing to do with it? sharedvalues Oct 2017 #3
And it is still valid to this day. Reread it and tell me what is not factual within the article. Purveyor Oct 2017 #6
Or you tell us why fake Russian stories had no effect sharedvalues Oct 2017 #9
I'll never convince you otherwise so just continue to carry on. Fact of the matter is Purveyor Oct 2017 #10
It can be both sharedvalues Oct 2017 #13
It's irrational to believe one causal factor denies another causal factor. LanternWaste Oct 2017 #48
Judicial watch spent half a billion smearing HRC sharedvalues Oct 2017 #5
Because "Purveyor" from DU can read the minds of all Michigan voters Pugster Oct 2017 #15
Well I have lived here for some 50 years so I do have a good feel of my surroundings. Purveyor Oct 2017 #17
Russia gave your Bernie and Jill Stein good coverage Pugster Oct 2017 #23
Did they start clear back in the primaries too. Sanders beat Clinton overwhelmingly. Purveyor Oct 2017 #27
Did you just say Sanders beat Clinton? Pugster Oct 2017 #40
Russians and Trump/GOP collude in the election. rockfordfile Oct 2017 #19
That 12/16 article was written before anyone knew about the Russian propaganda pnwmom Oct 2017 #29
Any attempt to assign a single cause to a very complex event is a big mistake. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #44
Hey you should read your own article. MGKrebs Oct 2017 #46
K & R FailureToCommunicate Oct 2017 #8
They paid for it in rubles don't forget. BigmanPigman Oct 2017 #12
It's just a tad odd that Russia targeted the same states as the Trump team did. MelissaB Oct 2017 #22
I'm betting PA as well. I know a few people from there that were hit w a load of propaganda. bettyellen Oct 2017 #24
Here's the thing about Pennsylvania DeminPennswoods Oct 2017 #41
The Russian ads were mostly trashing Clinton - not all Dems at all- it set her up as bettyellen Oct 2017 #45
Ryan? Anything to say? C Moon Oct 2017 #38
K & R for exposure. SunSeeker Oct 2017 #39
just look at how the "Vegas Shooter is a liberal" Story Spread JI7 Oct 2017 #43

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
2. Wow! So Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and Jared Kushner
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:30 PM
Oct 2017

had nothing to do with Clinton losing Michigan?

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
14. Fake russian stories influenced CNN, NYT, etc.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:51 PM
Oct 2017

Russians put propanganda into our media through social media and their outlets: RT, Sputnik.
Into ALL our media.

Look at how they are attempting to polarize Americans over the Vegas shooting.

FakeNoose

(32,748 posts)
25. The solution is to never go on Facebook
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:41 PM
Oct 2017

If you HAVE to go on Facebook, never read a news story or an advertisment that's been made to look like a news story.

Never click on any ad you see on Facebook. Never click on something that COULD be an ad or it COULD be a fake news story, but you're not sure. (It probably is fake news, so don't click on it.)

Get out of Facebook as quickly as possible and get back to safety on DU.






sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
32. And do not install apps
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:51 PM
Oct 2017

Apps have way more power than websites. For example the Facebook app tracks your location and saves it.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
47. I too make a quick stop at anything which invalidates my biases...
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 12:06 PM
Oct 2017

I too make a quick stop at anything which invalidates my biases...

rockfordfile

(8,704 posts)
20. Clearly they do. They fell for the Russian puppet and their propaganda.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:11 PM
Oct 2017

I met Trump idiot voters and usually they go to those kind of propaganda outlets when asking for information.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
21. The rank and file voters she lost here in MI do not have Facebook accounts and barely
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:16 PM
Oct 2017

have an email address, if that. Hell, I think I have one buy only used it for coupons or something or other.

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
34. You are the one who made the original claim and you can't support it.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:55 PM
Oct 2017

You said that the people who didn't vote for Hillary aren't connected to Facebook and the other social media that Russia used.

I am saying you have no evidence. The only way you can logically prove me wrong is to provide such evidence.

Still waiting.



LisaM

(27,830 posts)
35. I am from Michigan and I know people who fell for those ads
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 12:06 AM
Oct 2017

Last edited Wed Oct 4, 2017, 07:02 AM - Edit history (1)

and forwarded them. So yeah, there are plenty of rank and file voters in Michigan with Facebook accounts who went for Trump.

You can also look at the voting machine issue in Detroit.

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
42. Plus
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 06:27 AM
Oct 2017

Interstate CrossCheck = stealing the right to vote.

IIRC many more voters were spuriously purged from the voting rolls than the number by which Secretary Clinton "lost" in e.g. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Redux of what happened in Flori-duh when chimpy got installed. His brother and katherine harris purged 10s of thousands of African Americans before that stolen election. The pukes have just perfected their strategy now.

Also, how did the russians know which states to target? Because the dump campaign was colluding with them by giving them GOPee voter district information. Bet that comes out in the Mueller investigation.

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
33. No, I think you missed it in your posts.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:51 PM
Oct 2017

2/3 of US adults use Facebook, and 2/3 of them get their news on Facebook.

You have no evidence that the people who didn't vote for Hillary in Michigan are any different from other voters with respect to their use of social media.

http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/05/pew-report-44-percent-of-u-s-adults-get-news-on-facebook/

 

certainot

(9,090 posts)
37. no, they live in limbaugh/talk radio world - and that's why the politico analysis is also bullshit
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 12:18 AM
Oct 2017

talk radio, with putin's crew piggybacking 25 years of clinton swiftboating and dems continuing the giant fail of ignoring talk radio because it hurts thinking people's ears, had a hell of a lot more to do with it than 'white working man's economic angst'

and look at the money - 24 limbaugh stations in wisc and mich depend on 4 major universities that need to reread their mission statements.
19 Michigan St. 11, Michigan 7, Western Michigan 1
uni of Wisconsin 5

and look at what that's worth-

at a cheap $1000/hr x 15hrs/day x 5 = $75,000/wk x 24 stations rw talk radio is worth $1.8MIL/week or 7.2MIL$ /month free for trump

when dems and the analysts analyze what happened they might want to do some simple math. apparently putin's guys did.

dems don't even poll trump support for talk radio, and if they did they'd probably find putins facebook ads did a lot of piggybacking.

that's probably why trumps guys studied talk radio in 2014 (ny magazine, gabriel sherman 4/3/16)

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
3. False in general. You think Russian intervention had nothing to do with it?
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:31 PM
Oct 2017

That politico article came out BEFORE the Russia evidence

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
9. Or you tell us why fake Russian stories had no effect
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:37 PM
Oct 2017

Which is the topic of the CNN article linked in op.

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
10. I'll never convince you otherwise so just continue to carry on. Fact of the matter is
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:39 PM
Oct 2017

she thought she had Michigan in the bag, ignored us and she didn't.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
13. It can be both
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:48 PM
Oct 2017

In fact is certainly IS both - certainly multiple failings can be involved when a race is so close.

In this case, she could have won by working harder in MI. OR if the Russians had stayed out.

I tend to get a lot more worked up about foreign intelligence services intervening in our election.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
48. It's irrational to believe one causal factor denies another causal factor.
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 12:09 PM
Oct 2017

It's irrational to believe one causal factor denies another causal factor.

sharedvalues

(6,916 posts)
5. Judicial watch spent half a billion smearing HRC
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:35 PM
Oct 2017

Right wing billionaires have been smearing the Clintons for two decades. The smear front Judicial Watch alone spent $500M over that time.

Also Maggie haberman alone at the NYT probably had a bigger effect on Michigan votes than the effects listed in that article.

Hillary is a great politician and candidate. She is not ideally suited to modern media and she is too hawkish for me. Read her book for more details.

 

Pugster

(229 posts)
23. Russia gave your Bernie and Jill Stein good coverage
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:25 PM
Oct 2017

It's understandable that you feel compelled to underestimate the help Russia gave Trump, because otherwise you would be acknowledging that Russian propaganda worked (in favor of both Trump and Sanders and against Hillary).

 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
27. Did they start clear back in the primaries too. Sanders beat Clinton overwhelmingly.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:45 PM
Oct 2017

Nate Silver is still wearing that "egg".

pnwmom

(108,994 posts)
29. That 12/16 article was written before anyone knew about the Russian propaganda
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 11:47 PM
Oct 2017

and Hillary lost Michigan by less than 11K votes. So that article is next to worthless as a source today.

The difference in the election results was so small that any one of several things -- including Russian propaganda -- could have been enough to toss the election to DT.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,036 posts)
44. Any attempt to assign a single cause to a very complex event is a big mistake.
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 10:01 AM
Oct 2017

The Russian interference was a contributing factor, perhaps enough to tip the balance.

This set of ads was one of many on many different media.

If she had won by a similar margin, Politico et al would be running articles "How Clinton took Michigan — and won the election".

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
46. Hey you should read your own article.
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 11:59 AM
Oct 2017

"In results that narrow, Clinton’s loss could be attributed to any number of factors — FBI Director Jim Comey’s letter shifting late deciders, the lack of a compelling economic message, the apparent Russian hacking. "

BigmanPigman

(51,627 posts)
12. They paid for it in rubles don't forget.
Tue Oct 3, 2017, 10:43 PM
Oct 2017

The fake prez spent most of his campaign budget ($85 million) on Facebook and wouldn'the have won without them. Between Russia and his campaign no one else stood a chance.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029595857
This says it all! Facebook, Cambridge Analytical, etc.

DeminPennswoods

(15,290 posts)
41. Here's the thing about Pennsylvania
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 04:34 AM
Oct 2017

In the election, Democrats won ALL the state row offices (Atty General, Treasurer, Aud General), so Pennsylvanians were not averse to electing Dems statewide. Josh Shapiro, who was elected Atty Gen and got more total votes than any other candidate on the ballot, won counties Clintons lost. Had Shapiro voters also voted for Clinton, she'd have won the state.

I'm sure some voters were influenced by Russian ads on facebook, but there were plenty of voters who just didn't like and/or didn't connect with Clinton.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
45. The Russian ads were mostly trashing Clinton - not all Dems at all- it set her up as
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 11:10 AM
Oct 2017

An exception apart from other Dems and a pariah to Republicans. So I don't see why you'd say that. The PA people I saw were pushing CTs from Sputnik and what looked like real newspapers but werent.

C Moon

(12,221 posts)
38. Ryan? Anything to say?
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 01:07 AM
Oct 2017

It was strange watching how Ryan nervously shifted from being against Trump, to supporting Trump.
It made me suspicious when I saw it happen. But I was thinking it was more in the line of promises from Trump.
Now I'm beginning to wonder if it was something on a larger scale.

JI7

(89,264 posts)
43. just look at how the "Vegas Shooter is a liberal" Story Spread
Wed Oct 4, 2017, 07:12 AM
Oct 2017

even when authorities said the guy was local and the ones they were accusing were not from there it was still all over the internet.

now they are convincing themselves it's some liberal conspiracy to make white men look bad.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian-linked Facebook a...