California challenges Trump's rollback of birth control mandate
Source: The Hill
California Attorney General Xavier Bercerra (D) on Friday filed a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's rollback of an Obama-era policy that required employers include birth control coverage in their health insurance plans.
Donald Trump wants businesses and corporations to control family planning decisions rather than a woman in consultation with her doctor. These anti-women's health regulations prove once again that the Trump administration is willing to trample on peoples rights, Becerra said in a statement.
What group of Americans will they target next? Will they allow businesses to deny you cancer treatment? Will they exclude you from insurance coverage because of a pre-existing health condition? The California Department of Justice will fight to protect every womans right to healthcare, including reproductive healthcare. We'll see the Trump administration in court," he continued.
The lawsuit comes after the White House announced that all employers would no longer have to provide birth control to employees under their health insurance plans if the employers have religious objectives, or in the case of for-profit or non-profit employers "moral objectives," to the use of contraceptives.
-snip-
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/354341-california-challenges-trumps-rollback-of-birth-control-mandate
Massachusetts is also suing:
http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2017/10/massachusetts_attorney_general_36.html
MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)Let the masses continue to rise and speak for the people.
(for the red-necks: fuck you, losers, you ain't gonna' keep us down!)
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,034 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,839 posts)iluvtennis
(19,868 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,839 posts)The thing is, New York is a blue state because of the greater population around NYC. Upstate didn't even vote for Governor Cuomo.
BigmanPigman
(51,623 posts)for this to happen.
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,623 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)insurance premium is the cost of this one item? I seem to recall back when they were designing Obamacare the insurance o's saying they Love to include coverage for BC because pregnancy is WAY MORE EXPENSIVE for them. Not that I don't care about every woman, but if I'm right, this order of the Con today will only affect "Christian" businesses.
Loyd
(309 posts)iluvtennis
(19,868 posts)MurrayDelph
(5,300 posts)when white, alleged-Christians can use it to take away rights from others.