Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 05:58 PM Oct 2017

Atty General: Businesses have a fundamental right to discriminate against LGBT people

Source: LGBTQNation




By Bil Browning · Thursday, October 12, 2017

In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Attorney General Jeff Sessions spelled out what the Trump administration has been broadcasting for months. They think LGBTQ people are second class citizens. When interviewer David Brody asked Sessions about a hypothetical “Christian baker” who didn’t want to make a wedding cake for a gay or lesbian couple, Sessions was quick to defend discrimination.

-snip-

“Is it the Department of Justice’s view that cake bakers… these Christian bakers, is it the view of the Department of Justice from a guidance perspective, not law, I understand law is different, that they have a right, if you will, to not sell a cake to someone if they’re having a gay wedding?” Brody asks. “Is that what the Department of Justice is saying as it relates to the guidance that they put out?”

“Well what I would say to you now, while the matter is in litigation, but I would just say to you that too often we have ignored what the Constitution actually says,” Session replied. “It says Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof. So the question is, the cake baker has more than just a personal view here. He has a religious view and he feels that he is not being able to freely exercise his religion by being required to participate in a ceremony in some fashion that he does not believe in.”

“So we think that right is a fundamental right and ought to be respected as we work through this process. Of course in the 1990’s we passed a religious freedom restoration act that said the government should not constrict a person’s religious belief without a compelling reason to do so. So we think that statute has been ignored too often and not respected sufficiently. And so when you consider those two things, then you’re getting not only greater protection for people’s religious beliefs, that I think should be given.”



Read more: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2017/10/atty-general-businesses-fundamental-right-discriminate-lgbt-people

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Atty General: Businesses have a fundamental right to discriminate against LGBT people (Original Post) DonViejo Oct 2017 OP
ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #1
In this case, they shouldn't ck4829 Oct 2017 #3
It's what Susan Sarandon wanted. Just LOOK at how giddy and animated she is... NurseJackie Oct 2017 #10
You are looking at the dictionary example of Eliot Rosewater Oct 2017 #13
Religious intolerance has un-American consequences. Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #2
Hey Sessions have you ever heard of the "EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE" turbinetree Oct 2017 #4
Are there shops that refuse to serve Fundamentalists? bucolic_frolic Oct 2017 #5
one that happened recently catsudon Oct 2017 #7
That path is fundamentally divisive; trailblazed by divisive christian dominionists. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2017 #12
His belief in freedom of religion is restricted to people who hate the things he hates jmowreader Oct 2017 #6
and the protrump LGBT people are amazed... irisblue Oct 2017 #8
Geez. Changing the law on this would legalize discrimination. Who would be next? Honeycombe8 Oct 2017 #9
atheists could be next Angry Dragon Oct 2017 #14
That perjurious little asswipe can eat shit. BigDemVoter Oct 2017 #11
Ignorance rules the day in the Trump Adninistration. world wide wally Oct 2017 #15
While this is all being settled and debated, I, for one hamsterjill Oct 2017 #16
As Goodwin's Law has offficially been suspended when it comes to the Trump administration, Nitram Oct 2017 #17

Eliot Rosewater

(31,113 posts)
1. ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 05:59 PM
Oct 2017

I am not allowed to say that the way I want to around here

do the math grrrrrrrrr

ck4829

(35,079 posts)
3. In this case, they shouldn't
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:03 PM
Oct 2017

Seeing human and civil rights be dependent on a whim should be a tad bit unsettling regardless of who is President.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
10. It's what Susan Sarandon wanted. Just LOOK at how giddy and animated she is...
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:37 PM
Oct 2017

... she can barely contain her excitement at the horrors that await us.


Bernardo de La Paz

(49,027 posts)
2. Religious intolerance has un-American consequences.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:02 PM
Oct 2017

Religious rights do NOT TRUMP human rights.

Human rights rule over and above religious rights.

Christian religion was used to justify slavery... and then segregation.

Religion is still used today to justify mistreating women and discrimination against them.


turbinetree

(24,710 posts)
4. Hey Sessions have you ever heard of the "EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE"
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:05 PM
Oct 2017

if you don't know, try finding it, because asshole its there in black and white


Oh, yeah, even though your just like your orange hair moron, who wants to create diversions. your still as much as a traitor, as he is



jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
6. His belief in freedom of religion is restricted to people who hate the things he hates
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:16 PM
Oct 2017

I am almost certain if someone planted a church that saw cannabis use as a sacrament, he would not be claiming their freedom of religion gave them the right to spark up.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
9. Geez. Changing the law on this would legalize discrimination. Who would be next?
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 06:34 PM
Oct 2017

A biracial married couple? Some claim religious views prohibit different races from marrying.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
14. atheists could be next
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 07:19 PM
Oct 2017

and then any other religion .......... like in the old days

Sessions likes to live on the slippery slope

world wide wally

(21,751 posts)
15. Ignorance rules the day in the Trump Adninistration.
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 09:41 PM
Oct 2017

Meaning, they count on their supporters being as ignorant as they are.
And they are pretty much right about that. These aren't exactly the days of enlightenment.

hamsterjill

(15,223 posts)
16. While this is all being settled and debated, I, for one
Thu Oct 12, 2017, 10:40 PM
Oct 2017

Will simply be boycotting any business that does not support full equality. I think everyone else should, too.

Nitram

(22,845 posts)
17. As Goodwin's Law has offficially been suspended when it comes to the Trump administration,
Fri Oct 13, 2017, 08:47 AM
Oct 2017

I will point out that labor union members, Gypsies, Jews, and Catholics are next, in that order. The wearing of government-approved insignia so that such "people" can easily be identified by law-abiding citizens will soon be mandated.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Atty General: Businesses ...