Atty General: Businesses have a fundamental right to discriminate against LGBT people
Source: LGBTQNation
By Bil Browning · Thursday, October 12, 2017
In an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network, Attorney General Jeff Sessions spelled out what the Trump administration has been broadcasting for months. They think LGBTQ people are second class citizens. When interviewer David Brody asked Sessions about a hypothetical Christian baker who didnt want to make a wedding cake for a gay or lesbian couple, Sessions was quick to defend discrimination.
-snip-
Is it the Department of Justices view that cake bakers
these Christian bakers, is it the view of the Department of Justice from a guidance perspective, not law, I understand law is different, that they have a right, if you will, to not sell a cake to someone if theyre having a gay wedding? Brody asks. Is that what the Department of Justice is saying as it relates to the guidance that they put out?
Well what I would say to you now, while the matter is in litigation, but I would just say to you that too often we have ignored what the Constitution actually says, Session replied. It says Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of a religion nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof. So the question is, the cake baker has more than just a personal view here. He has a religious view and he feels that he is not being able to freely exercise his religion by being required to participate in a ceremony in some fashion that he does not believe in.
So we think that right is a fundamental right and ought to be respected as we work through this process. Of course in the 1990s we passed a religious freedom restoration act that said the government should not constrict a persons religious belief without a compelling reason to do so. So we think that statute has been ignored too often and not respected sufficiently. And so when you consider those two things, then youre getting not only greater protection for peoples religious beliefs, that I think should be given.
Read more: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2017/10/atty-general-businesses-fundamental-right-discriminate-lgbt-people
Eliot Rosewater
(31,113 posts)I am not allowed to say that the way I want to around here
do the math grrrrrrrrr
ck4829
(35,079 posts)Seeing human and civil rights be dependent on a whim should be a tad bit unsettling regardless of who is President.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... she can barely contain her excitement at the horrors that await us.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,113 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,027 posts)Religious rights do NOT TRUMP human rights.
Human rights rule over and above religious rights.
Christian religion was used to justify slavery... and then segregation.
Religion is still used today to justify mistreating women and discrimination against them.
turbinetree
(24,710 posts)if you don't know, try finding it, because asshole its there in black and white
Oh, yeah, even though your just like your orange hair moron, who wants to create diversions. your still as much as a traitor, as he is
bucolic_frolic
(43,249 posts)or Republicans?
catsudon
(849 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,027 posts)jmowreader
(50,562 posts)I am almost certain if someone planted a church that saw cannabis use as a sacrament, he would not be claiming their freedom of religion gave them the right to spark up.
irisblue
(33,018 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)A biracial married couple? Some claim religious views prohibit different races from marrying.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)and then any other religion .......... like in the old days
Sessions likes to live on the slippery slope
BigDemVoter
(4,154 posts)world wide wally
(21,751 posts)Meaning, they count on their supporters being as ignorant as they are.
And they are pretty much right about that. These aren't exactly the days of enlightenment.
hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)Will simply be boycotting any business that does not support full equality. I think everyone else should, too.
Nitram
(22,845 posts)I will point out that labor union members, Gypsies, Jews, and Catholics are next, in that order. The wearing of government-approved insignia so that such "people" can easily be identified by law-abiding citizens will soon be mandated.