Exclusive: U.S. banks told to make plans for preventing collapse
Source: Reuters
U.S. regulators directed five of the country's biggest banks, including Bank of America Corp and Goldman Sachs Group Inc, to develop plans for staving off collapse if they faced serious problems, emphasizing that the banks could not count on government help.
The two-year-old program, which has been largely secret until now, is in addition to the "living wills" the banks crafted to help regulators dismantle them if they actually do fail. It shows how hard regulators are working to ensure that banks have plans for worst-case scenarios and can act rationally in times of distress.
... According to documents obtained by Reuters, the Federal Reserve and the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency first directed five banks - which also include Citigroup Inc,, Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase & Co - to come up with these "recovery plans" in May 2010.
They told banks to consider drastic efforts to prevent failure in times of distress, including selling off businesses, finding other funding sources if regular borrowing markets shut them out, and reducing risk. The plans must be feasible to execute within three to six months, and banks were to "make no assumption of extraordinary support from the public sector," according to the documents.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/10/us-banks-recoveryplans-idUSBRE87905N20120810
Kennah
(14,273 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)banks and in a credible position to threaten to further destroy the American economy, they will be in a position to get more bailouts and taxpayer-funded bonuses.
Now, the U.S. regulators who have been working with the banks for two years under a largely secret program want the banks to develop another plan. What if the banks prefer the plan that they already have?
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Duh. The small banks have been taken over, and there is nothing too big to fail. The fact that they ask them to have a plan on hand, means that we actually have a govt that is proactive.
But the crazy people that listen to Glenn Beck will see this as proof that our economy is collapsing.
it's not. not even fucking close.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)By Annalyn Censky @CNNMoney November 22, 2011
http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/22/news/economy/federal_reserve_stress_tests/index.htm
This week another story came up:
Size not the prize in bank stress testing, researchers say
UK FocusReuters -Thu, Aug 2, 2012
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/size-not-prize-bank-stress-143925552.html
Just for grins I looked up this about the tests they are talking about:
Bank of America CEO On Recovery, Plans for Company 25 Jan 2012
http://www.cnbc.com/id/46132121/Bank_of_America_CEO_On_Recovery_Plans_for_Company
And the granddaddy of them all, which I do not claim to understand, and showed why some were squealing so loud:
Troubled Asset Relief Program
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troubled_Asset_Relief_Program
Interesting information, thank you!
PB
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)J P Morgan Chase learned the lesson the hard way when they lost $3-8 billion on a single transaction a couple of months back so the problem is real. And these investment banks cannot police themselves as the J P Morgan Chase transaction shows us. Then who regulates the regulators when the door revolves and the regulators are former bankers and the banks then welcome back the regulators.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)plans for war with Andorra!
DCKit
(18,541 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)*snark*
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Posted by Mark on December 1, 2010
The Fox News Professor of Practical Dementia delivered a particularly thought provoking lecture today on his radio university. I dare you to make sense of it:
Glenn Beck: This is the oldest argument in the progressive movement. It is the argument between, not state capitalism, because this isnt capitalism.
This is a new sort of capitalism. No its not! It is socialism. No, its state capitalism. No its not! Put the Thesaurus down. It is socialism, not capitalism.
And when you say state you mean national. National Socialism. That is what Mussolini and Hitler did. National Socialism. State Capitalism. Theyve changed the name.
Notice that Beck never actually tells us what the old progressive argument is. He just wonders off to build some sort of imaginary bridge between progressives and Nazis.
Let me take a stab at it. In this utterly incoherent rant, I think Beck is attempting to argue that the word state is synonymous with the word national, and the word capitalism is synonymous with the word socialism. Really? Dont stop to think about it. Just keep listening.
Beck continues by saying that if you replace the word state in State Capitalism with the word national, and then replace the word capitalism with socialism, you have National Socialism, or, as they are better known, Nazis.
All of this is somehow associated with progressives who advocate neither State Capitalism nor National Socialism. Again, I implore you, dont stop to think about it. Just accept that progressives are Nazis by virtue of Becks word replacement exercise.
Now try it yourself at home. Take any phrase, i.e. Furry Kitten. Now replace the word furry with national, and the word kitten with socialism. There you have it.
Unassailable evidence that furry kittens are Nazis.
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=3347