Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:22 PM Aug 2012

Israeli newspaper says PM, defence minister want to attack Iran before U.S. election

Source: National Post

The front-page report in the biggest-selling daily Yedioth Ahronoth came amid mounting speculation — fuelled by media leaks from both the government and its detractors at home and abroad — that war with Iran could be imminent even though it might rupture the bedrock ties between Israel and the United States.

“Were it up to Benjamin Netanyahu and Ehud Barak, an Israeli military strike on the nuclear facilities in Iran would take place in the coming autumn months, before the November election in the United States,” Yedioth said in the article by its two senior commentators, which appeared to draw on discussions with the defense minister but included no direct quotes.

Spokesmen for Prime Minister Netanyahu and Barak declined to comment.



Read more: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/08/10/israeli-newspaper-says-pm-defence-minister-want-to-attack-irans-before-u-s-election/

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Israeli newspaper says PM, defence minister want to attack Iran before U.S. election (Original Post) Lucy Goosey Aug 2012 OP
they can't even take the facilities out entirely. so why now? xchrom Aug 2012 #1
Can you say "OCTOBER SURPRISE"? Joe Bacon Aug 2012 #58
Go for it BiBi atreides1 Aug 2012 #2
Ahh, but they are not on their own, at least not for long. CanonRay Aug 2012 #5
Why is that, Bibi? Oh that's right "America is a thing you can move very easily" Firebrand Gary Aug 2012 #3
That's what I was wondering. Trillo Aug 2012 #42
October would be a great time for this. gordianot Aug 2012 #4
Poke, poke, prod, prod . . . maybe the beast will finally do something stupid, and Bibi can have his leveymg Aug 2012 #6
Wouldn't it be wonderful if China, Russia and the United States told them to have at it? gordianot Aug 2012 #10
So Romney DID try to start a war while he was there. sofa king Aug 2012 #7
They've been wanting to attack Iran since Bush the Lesser's 1st term. bemildred Aug 2012 #8
Obama would be dealing dotymed Aug 2012 #16
Wars always give an initial boost to sitting Presidents. "Rally round the Flag" right? bemildred Aug 2012 #19
Especially if Iran hit one of our ships in the Gulf Equate Aug 2012 #20
Yes. All of that. bemildred Aug 2012 #21
I agree Equate Aug 2012 #25
I am very skeptical about missile defense, that would be an interesting real-world test. bemildred Aug 2012 #29
Oh they wouldn't stop all the missiles Equate Aug 2012 #35
And i guess the US and Israel would go unscathed? This is so stupid on all counts. nanabugg Aug 2012 #27
Where did I say that the U.S. and Israel would go unscathed? Equate Aug 2012 #30
'pull our government into every ME conflict'...Ha ha, are you for real ? King_David Aug 2012 #44
Lebanon? n/t JoeyT Aug 2012 #48
Israel made the USA go to war in Lebanon? King_David Aug 2012 #53
Yeah, Lebanon: bemildred Aug 2012 #61
Are you referring to this? cali Aug 2012 #63
No. bemildred Aug 2012 #64
The USA was dragged into Lebanon 'during the Lebanese Civil War' King_David Aug 2012 #67
"Dragged" is a bit too much, we were more than willing. bemildred Aug 2012 #68
I don't know. JoeyT Aug 2012 #69
fine.. canuckledragger Aug 2012 #9
So is this the GOP October surprise? OregonBlue Aug 2012 #11
to start wwIII riverbendviewgal Aug 2012 #12
Just fail to see how it would help Romney the great communicator rich guy. gordianot Aug 2012 #33
Why is Israel so eager to start a war? darkangel218 Aug 2012 #13
Well, one Israeli newspaper quoted in Canada's most conservative newspaper says so, at least Posteritatis Aug 2012 #14
selfish heaven05 Aug 2012 #15
Oh noes! Behind the Aegis Aug 2012 #17
What's right on schedule is more Israeli threats and bluster. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2012 #70
What's right on schedule is the reporting and the predictable comments like yours. Behind the Aegis Aug 2012 #73
well there are lots of theories out there azurnoir Aug 2012 #18
well??? heaven05 Aug 2012 #24
so you agree that Iran is the new Weirmacht? where are the camps ? azurnoir Aug 2012 #26
whatever heaven05 Aug 2012 #38
your in initial comment spoke of "looks of hatred" azurnoir Aug 2012 #40
those looks heaven05 Aug 2012 #49
looks led to lynchings when was this more than 50 years ago? azurnoir Aug 2012 #50
no heaven05 Aug 2012 #60
As right wing as Iran may be. It is not comparable to the south, 50 years ago. Ash_F Aug 2012 #62
what more? Israel can not take out Iran on its own azurnoir Aug 2012 #66
no problem heaven05 Aug 2012 #71
ah so it seems thast some feel its a kill or be killed situation? azurnoir Aug 2012 #65
you're right heaven05 Aug 2012 #72
With the existence of Israel ,it can never happen in 2012 , King_David Aug 2012 #43
They are a nuclear threat if we make them one. They among some of most caring, peaceful people I nanabugg Aug 2012 #28
always heaven05 Aug 2012 #39
'They aren't insane' King_David Aug 2012 #45
Why would a theocratic dictatorship ronnie624 Aug 2012 #59
They could be, Dash87 Aug 2012 #36
pretty much maybe but we've been hearing this stuff for about 7 years by my count azurnoir Aug 2012 #37
"well ... President Romney said it was OK" JoePhilly Aug 2012 #22
That is just brilliant. More environmental disasters. glinda Aug 2012 #23
Stipulating that this story might be complete bunk... bluestateguy Aug 2012 #31
I am not sure what games are being played, but oil is back up. I also remember the wmds that Iraq still_one Aug 2012 #32
The neocon plan for decades has always been... AntiFascist Aug 2012 #41
If they were going to do this they would not be leaking it...n/t Blue Meany Aug 2012 #34
That won't help Mittens Thrill Aug 2012 #46
Operation Northwoods paints a different possible outcome. blkmusclmachine Aug 2012 #47
Why it his being leaked now, by whom and for what purpose? Blue Meany Aug 2012 #51
It's just a jump to the left! And then a step to the right, With your hands on your hips Behind the Aegis Aug 2012 #55
+1 King_David Aug 2012 #57
Can Israel attack Iran without approval from the USA? Deepunder Aug 2012 #52
The mental illness of these people hurts! n/t drdtroit Aug 2012 #54
Which ones? The ones who keep sucking this down? The ones reporting it? Who? Behind the Aegis Aug 2012 #56

Joe Bacon

(5,165 posts)
58. Can you say "OCTOBER SURPRISE"?
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:46 AM
Aug 2012

This is what I've been expecting all along. They're being egged on by Hagee and Adelson. And it will turn into a very deadly mistake.

CanonRay

(14,104 posts)
5. Ahh, but they are not on their own, at least not for long.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:32 PM
Aug 2012

as soon as they do it, the Iranians will attack everything moving in the Gulf. Our navy will have to respond. In we go...

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
42. That's what I was wondering.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 04:55 PM
Aug 2012

An attempt to move U.S. citizens to the right, shortly before the election.

gordianot

(15,239 posts)
4. October would be a great time for this.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:31 PM
Aug 2012

Problem is with his acute foreign relation experience I do not see a war heling Romney it would just be another opportunity to say something stupid. A war would take attenntion off his tax returns for a while.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
6. Poke, poke, prod, prod . . . maybe the beast will finally do something stupid, and Bibi can have his
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:32 PM
Aug 2012

glorious forever war that drags the United States in against Iran.

gordianot

(15,239 posts)
10. Wouldn't it be wonderful if China, Russia and the United States told them to have at it?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:42 PM
Aug 2012

Same for Turkey, Syria has their own problems. Alas the Straits will close off oil. The world thirst for oil is too great

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. They've been wanting to attack Iran since Bush the Lesser's 1st term.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:37 PM
Aug 2012

There seems to be some sort of stupid theory that starting a war with Iran would somehow harm Obama in the election, which is very funny to me. Obama does not want to go to war with Iran, but it will just seal his election landslide if it does happen.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
16. Obama would be dealing
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:08 PM
Aug 2012

with sky-high gas prices which our super intelligent population would probably consider to be his fault.....

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
19. Wars always give an initial boost to sitting Presidents. "Rally round the Flag" right?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:22 PM
Aug 2012

This is well known, why the corrupt ones love war so much: "War on Drugs", "War on Poverty", and so on.

And it would not be a case of Obama starting it either.
And there would not be time for the downside to hit before the election.
And Rmoney does not actually hold the advantage in the "War Leader" perceptions department anyway.
If anything, Rmoney is the one that looks like a lightweight.

 

Equate

(256 posts)
20. Especially if Iran hit one of our ships in the Gulf
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:31 PM
Aug 2012

the nation will rally around Pres. Obama if Iran hits one of our ships and he will be re-elected in a landslide. I have no doubt whatsoever that Obama will respond with massive air strikes and naval strikes if Iran hits a U.S. ship.

Iran's infrastructure & military would be in shambles in about 1 week and would be incapable of military ops., there would probably be a regime change after it became clear that they have been defeated militarily.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
21. Yes. All of that.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:37 PM
Aug 2012

And Israel will get well pasted with Iranian missile weapons, whatever they have, and O will not be happy with our little buddies in Tel Aviv when the dust settles either.

 

Equate

(256 posts)
25. I agree
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:49 PM
Aug 2012

Israel will get hit but not as bad as some might think, they have a pretty good missile defense and civil defense systems.

Pres. Obama would be very unhappy with Israel but he would hit Iran with everything we've got in the region, if Iran hit one our military asset in the area.
If I were Iran, I would think very hard about hitting a U.S. ship in the Gulf or any U.S. troops in the region because Obama will unleash hell on them, he is a proven entity, and I think that's why Israel would attack Iran before the election knowing that Iran will probably attack one of our ships and then the U.S. will attack Iran and do Israel's work for them.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
29. I am very skeptical about missile defense, that would be an interesting real-world test.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:13 PM
Aug 2012

Limited point defenses, OK, otherwise you are going to get hit, esp. with guided weapons.
Iran will not be reasonable. Consider the Iran-Iraq war. A few millions dead will be "worth it".

O will act intelligently and with restraint, that's why he's a good President.

As far as civil defense: Gas mask production not sufficient for entire public

 

Equate

(256 posts)
35. Oh they wouldn't stop all the missiles
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:54 PM
Aug 2012

but I think they could probably get to the 50% range which is pretty good. I have no doubt that Pres. Obama is intelligent and would try to act with restraint, but the pressure from the american people and the Congress would compel him to unleash a massive strike, especially after the first pictures of american casualities and damaged or sunk ships were published.

Good debate.

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
27. And i guess the US and Israel would go unscathed? This is so stupid on all counts.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:01 PM
Aug 2012

But it may unleash uf for good from the Iraeli strings that pull our government into every ME conflict. Their bombs, our blood and money. Is this all to stop the investigation of Adelson? Gotta wonder.

 

Equate

(256 posts)
30. Where did I say that the U.S. and Israel would go unscathed?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:14 PM
Aug 2012

There's no doubt that Iran would get a few licks in but how long do you think Iran's military would last under a massive U.S. air and naval strike? And if you think that Pres. Obama would sit by and let Iran get away with hitting any U.S. assets w/o responding, then you are sadly mistaken.
I fully believe he would unleash hell on earth on Iran and Iran's economy and military would cease to function in about a week.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
44. 'pull our government into every ME conflict'...Ha ha, are you for real ?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 05:06 PM
Aug 2012

Please name just one war Israel has pulled the USA into.

JUST ONE,

This should be good....

We are waiting.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
63. Are you referring to this?
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:16 AM
Aug 2012

Mossad conspiracy theory

Former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky has accused the Mossad of knowing of the plans for the bombing, but decided against informing the Americans of the attack. According to Ostrovsky, then Mossad head Nahum Admoni decided against informing the Americans on the grounds that the Mossad's responsibility was to protect Israel's interests, not Americans. Admoni denied having any prior knowledge of the attack.[55] Ostrovsky further claimed that among the high level officers of the Mossad there was a view that if the Americans "wanted to stick their nose into this Lebanon thing, let them pay the price."[56] Benny Morris, in his review of Ostrovsky's book, wrote that Ostrovsky was "barely a case officer before he was fired; most of his (brief) time in the agency was spent as a trainee" adding that due to compartmentalization "he did not and could not have had much knowledge of then current Mossad operations, let alone operational history." Benny Morris wrote that the claim regarding the barracks was "odd" and an example of one of Ostrovsky's "Wet" stories which were "mostly fabricated."[57]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_Beirut_barracks_bombing

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
64. No.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:22 AM
Aug 2012

We (The USA) were in Lebanon, that's what I'm referring to. There were quite a few dead marines as a consequence, and that ought not be overlooked.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
67. The USA was dragged into Lebanon 'during the Lebanese Civil War'
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:54 AM
Aug 2012

by Israel , and shed blood for Israel ?

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
68. "Dragged" is a bit too much, we were more than willing.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:00 PM
Aug 2012

Nevertheless there was no particular reason for us to send the marines to Lebanon, other than our alliance with Israel.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
69. I don't know.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:10 PM
Aug 2012

That's why there was a question mark. I read for an hour and ME politics are so complicated I couldn't figure out a damned thing.

canuckledragger

(1,642 posts)
9. fine..
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:39 PM
Aug 2012

Let that psychotic little war monger do it..

But on his own.

With NO help from any other country.

& let him deal with the consequences of provoking a war without help from anyone else either.

I don't have sympathy for any extremists (political or religious based) down that way & even less for 'pre-emptive' attacks either.

I still don't forget about the phosphorus shelling incident a while back

(I realize that skirmishes there have been going on there for a while & both sides are dirty..but using phosphorus shells is just plain evil)

riverbendviewgal

(4,253 posts)
12. to start wwIII
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:52 PM
Aug 2012

The neo cons would love....Romney send your sons to battle on the front line since you want this so badly..

gordianot

(15,239 posts)
33. Just fail to see how it would help Romney the great communicator rich guy.
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:31 PM
Aug 2012

The horse would be midstream. The fundie nuts would not want a Mormon but since they think Obama is a Muslim as presented on Fox Noise that evens out. The Israeli's may be taking a page from North Korea "I'm over here!".

As to Romney maybe he has a good bunker and several years worth of food. There would be many businesses to raid but not worth much when they are ash heaps.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
13. Why is Israel so eager to start a war?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 12:53 PM
Aug 2012

What is it for them to gain?? Even if Iran develops nukes, so many other countries have em too, including Israel, so why do they care? Im more afraid of Russians and Pakistan than Iran. I really don't understand why this wish for destruction, do they get all warm and fuzzy when they know ppl are dying?? It's sickening :'(

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
14. Well, one Israeli newspaper quoted in Canada's most conservative newspaper says so, at least
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:02 PM
Aug 2012

Israel and the US are always just abou to attack Iran anyway. I don't really see it happening.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
15. selfish
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:06 PM
Aug 2012

For purely selfish reasons (gas prices for one)I hope this is not true, yet if it's not just this rightwingers of Israel that are pushing this reasoning, then maybe they know something we don't about a threat to their nation

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
70. What's right on schedule is more Israeli threats and bluster.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:33 PM
Aug 2012

You ridicule people who worry about Israel striking Iran's nuclear program, yet it's mainly because of all the sabre-rattling coming from Tel Aviv. Are we supposed to ignore all that? Are those sabre-rattlers just joshing around?

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
73. What's right on schedule is the reporting and the predictable comments like yours.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:34 PM
Aug 2012

This has been going on since 2003. And, like then, the chicken little BS cries of the "sky is falling" hasn't changed a bit. It is a back and forth that has been happen for a decade. Ignore it? Did I say such a thing? Why, no, I didn't. But at least be able to be aware and stop with the Pavlovian responses.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
18. well there are lots of theories out there
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:22 PM
Aug 2012

the first being that Iran is the 'new' Nazi Germany

Iran’s anti-Semitism makes it the greatest threat to Jews

Blame it on my upbringing, or what I learned in school, or what I saw when I visited the Dachau concentration camp in 1968. The Holocaust was the most evil event of the 20th century.

So it is abhorrent to me that a government in today’s world would advocate a repeat of that horror. And it is almost beyond belief that the rest of the world would hear such an outrage and look the other way.

I am referring, of course, to the leaders of today’s Iran and the global ho-hum response to the most virulent form of state-sponsored anti-Semitism since Nazi Germany.

I say this as a great-grandson of slaves, as the son of parents whose potential was stifled by unrelenting racism, as a man whose youth was stymied by Jim Crow and racial prejudice, as a father who aches with anger and sorrow that he has failed to give his children and grandchildren an America that will not regard their skin color as a blemish on their humanity.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/colbert-king-irans-anti-semitism-makes-it-the-greatest-threat-to-jews/2012/08/03/75126d28-dcfa-11e1-af1d-753c613ff6d8_story.html

notice it does not say Israel it says Jews meaning every Jew everywhere, and invokes visions of the Holocaust and ignores the fact that there are 25,000 Iranian Jews living in Iran that apparently are not yet in camps

then there is the theory that it is a litmus test for Obama's loyalty to Israel and the Jewish people, if the US does not come to Israel's aid US Jews will turn en-mass against Obama there by due the electoral collage system he will lose the election by losing states such as Florida, New York, and California

then finally and the one that I am most convinced by is that it is a distraction from the Palestinian issue while Israel is beating the war drums about Iran it is also emptying Palestinian villages in the 60% of the West Bank completely controlled by Israel something that is largely unnoticed by the Western media
 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
24. well???
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:47 PM
Aug 2012

all the facts referred to in that link ring as truth, since I faced some of the unrelenting hate mentioned, as a CHILD and as an adult. People of a majority, in this country, have to remember that they have never experienced hate based on being a different race and if they did, it was backlash. Oh I can hear the outrage now. I don't care. People looked the other way when hate was shown to me as a child because of my skin color, I will never forget the looks of hate. The Palestinian issue IS important and is in addition to all the other important problems of that area. Who's to say the 25,000 won't be driven out or put in camps? So no right, no wrong it's just all fact. These are very dangerous times both nationally and internationally. Iran is a nuclear threat.Period

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. so you agree that Iran is the new Weirmacht? where are the camps ?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 01:57 PM
Aug 2012

where are the gas chambers?

I will say though there is much 'gas' being blown here though

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
38. whatever
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 03:26 PM
Aug 2012

like I said,you are entitled to think what you please. I don't care what you are spewing.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
50. looks led to lynchings when was this more than 50 years ago?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 10:04 PM
Aug 2012

Iran is not the US south it is not Nazi Germany but I do sense some blood lust amongst some

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
60. no
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 09:17 AM
Aug 2012

hey, headinsanditis, lynchings are starting again in the south. Not 50 years ago, still going on today. I will give no more respnse to ignorance.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
62. As right wing as Iran may be. It is not comparable to the south, 50 years ago.
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 09:28 AM
Aug 2012

Not even close. The hyperbole only works on the ignorant.

That said, I doubt Israel would want to stir the pot with the US this close to the election. Obama has been as supportive of them as any US president. The UNSC vetoes against the entire rest of the world still happen. What more can they want?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
66. what more? Israel can not take out Iran on its own
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:11 AM
Aug 2012

IDF has said that plainly, so it is possible that Israel is trying to pressure the US into assisting them, but it is also entirely possible that this is a political ploy on Ehud Barak's part, Israeli elections are coming in early 2013 possibly sooner as there have been calls for early elections there

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
71. no problem
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:16 PM
Aug 2012

no problem with that assessment, yet with the region as volatile as it is, we'll see

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
65. ah so it seems thast some feel its a kill or be killed situation?
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:28 AM
Aug 2012

Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:01 AM - Edit history (2)

comparing Tayvon Martin? to Iran and then using that as an excuse to justify war?

BTW I took lynching at its literal term and as far as my head being the sand nope I am just not an eye for an eye type or is more 100 eyes for an eye or what?

I;ve noted how people deal with the hate and bigotry they've been shown in the past some use it to help promote change for the better and some seem to actually relish it, parade it , wrap themselves in noble victim-hood, as it justifies their own hate and need for revenge

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
72. you're right
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:21 PM
Aug 2012

hate begats hate in some instances. noble victim hood, nah, just won't let someone who thinks they are superior for whatever reason, run roughshod over another person and if violence is necessary, so be it.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
43. With the existence of Israel ,it can never happen in 2012 ,
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 05:03 PM
Aug 2012

That is the precise reason a STRONG Jewish state is essential.

It works well for Jews worldwide.

 

nanabugg

(2,198 posts)
28. They are a nuclear threat if we make them one. They among some of most caring, peaceful people I
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:07 PM
Aug 2012

have ever met. Went to school with many of them and live among them now. Kind and gentle people who suffer the slings of ignorant government and hostile enemies. What would even the government of Iran accomplish by nuking someone??? They aren't insane...but I fear the Israeli Likud is.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
59. Why would a theocratic dictatorship
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:47 AM
Aug 2012

be any more "insane" than a 'democracy' that conspires to wage aggressive war, killing millions in other countries?

The conspicuousness of the double standards inherent to the common American world view, can astonish at times.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
36. They could be,
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 03:04 PM
Aug 2012

but it will never happen because their fundamentalist government dooms them to be a mediocre (at best) Middle Eastern theocracy that depends on the rest of the world much too much to fight with it. Nazi Germany, on the other hand, was relatively self-sufficient because of a good wartime economy.

If they could have killed Israel already, they would have.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
37. pretty much maybe but we've been hearing this stuff for about 7 years by my count
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 03:25 PM
Aug 2012

and something that occurred to me too, Israeli elections are not that far off either, Barak (Ehud) could be in the running there too

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
31. Stipulating that this story might be complete bunk...
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:28 PM
Aug 2012

they may find that if they do just that (bomb Iran), Obama will support them 100% and very publicly. Then Ramney will have no basis upon which to criticize and conservative Jewish (older) voters in Florida will move towards Obama.

And then Obama can drain the SPR spigot to tamp down gas prices too.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
32. I am not sure what games are being played, but oil is back up. I also remember the wmds that Iraq
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 02:30 PM
Aug 2012

Had. Actually, two points, if bushco with the help of congress did not invade Iraq then Iran would not be the issue it is today. Right or wrong they were a balance of power in the area

The second and most important point what gives us or anyone else for that matter to invade another country because we do not like what they are doing?

It is another argument if one country attacks another country, then there would be consequences, but not what they do internally

Another thing, as much as the idiots want to paint Iran as a crazed country, the truth is they are well aware if Iran launched a nuclear strike on Israel, they would assure themselves of absolute destruction

They are not going to do it unless they are attacked first.

If Iraq should have taught us one thing it is that actions in that area of the world have unknown ripple effects

You think the economy is bad, you ani't seen nothing yet if something like that happens

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
41. The neocon plan for decades has always been...
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 03:47 PM
Aug 2012

to first attack Iraq, then Iran, and the important result was to be regime change, which means very long involvement. Are all Israelies now falling in line with this? That would be very sad.

 

Blue Meany

(1,947 posts)
51. Why it his being leaked now, by whom and for what purpose?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 10:45 PM
Aug 2012

My take is that it is part of on an ongoing strategy to keep up pressure on Iranian leaders with the hope that some may weaken in the face of an imminent Israeli/American military attack. There have been numerous leaks of this kind over the past few years, especially near Presidential elections, alleging that an attack was imminent. There have been others implying that the US was trying to hold Israel back. And so on. I'm guessing that the real audience for these leaks is in Iran and that they are made more believable by the fact that they appear timed to influence US elections.

Behind the Aegis

(53,959 posts)
55. It's just a jump to the left! And then a step to the right, With your hands on your hips
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 11:28 PM
Aug 2012

You bring your knees in tight
But it's the pelvic thrust that really drives you insane,
Let's do the Time Warp again!

Gulf Daily News - Israeli attack on Iran is predicted -- 06 August 2011

A VETERAN intelligence expert has predicted an Israeli attack on Iran in a matter of months. However, an expert based in Bahrain told the
GDN such an attack would be unlikely - adding if it happened it was unlikely to be announced in advance.


Obama Warned Israel May Bomb Iran -- August 3, 2010

We write to alert you to the likelihood that Israel will attack Iran as early as this month. This would likely lead to a wider war.

Israel’s leaders would calculate that once the battle is joined, it will be politically untenable for you to give anything less than unstinting support to Israel, no matter how the war started, and that U.S. troops and weaponry would flow freely. Wider war could eventually result in destruction of the state of Israel.

Israel 'will attack Iran this year' if West does not cripple Tehran with sanctions -- 17 Sep 2009

Israel will attack Iran's nuclear facilities before the end of the year if the West has not launched an attempt to destroy the regime with crippling sanctions, a former senior defence official has claimed.

link:http://english.pravda.ru/world/asia/01-08-2008/105968-israel-0/|Israel ready to attack Iran without USA’s permission -- 01 August 2008

Israel has entered the last phase of its war preparations against Iran. Recent resignation of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, a proponent of negotiations and concessions, and several other factors speak well for the imminent war. Israel’s recent creation of the US missile defense shield can be another addition on the list. The US administration also tries to use the Israeli forces to play a dirty trick on Russia.




Do I need to keep going?! I used the first ones I found rather than spending hours (like last year), and finding more mainstream sources. However, all of these should be with in the realm of at least marginably acceptable for proving the task at hand. Keep in mind, the above are just SAMPLINGS of this story which has been in the news cycle for over TEN FUCKING YEARS and always with the same predicitable, mindless, bigoted rants from BOTH sides.

(Apologies for the Pravda source, and the formatting; the link wasn't showing.)

Deepunder

(6 posts)
52. Can Israel attack Iran without approval from the USA?
Fri Aug 10, 2012, 11:02 PM
Aug 2012

The USA controls everything around Iran from the land, sea and air access. The USA tracks everything especially any airplane that lands or takes off from this part of the world no matter if they are friend or foe.

The next question is if Israel does attack Iran who in our government approved it or purposely looked the other way to allow it to happen?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Israeli newspaper says PM...