Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:36 PM Nov 2017

Ohio House passes bill to ban abortion after Down syndrome diagnosis

Source: Cincinnati Enquirer


Jessie Balmert, The Cincinnati Enquirer
Published 9:44 p.m. ET Nov. 1, 2017

COLUMBUS — Ohio's GOP-controlled House passed a bill Wednesday to ban abortions after a fetal diagnosis of Down syndrome.

​​​​​​The proposal, which passed 63-30, would penalize doctors who perform those types of abortions.

. . .

American women choose to terminate pregnancies 50% to 85% of the time after a Down syndrome diagnosis, according to a study published in 2012 in the medical journal Prenatal Diagnosis.

Physicians who violate the proposed ban would face a fourth-degree felony, punishable by up to 18 months in prison and a $5,000 fine. They could also lose their license to practice medicine and face lawsuits if the woman is injured or dies because of the prohibited abortion.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/11/01/ohio-house-passes-bill-ban-abortion-after-down-syndrome-diagnosis/823885001/

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio House passes bill to ban abortion after Down syndrome diagnosis (Original Post) Judi Lynn Nov 2017 OP
Unconstitutional. McCamy Taylor Nov 2017 #1
That would be my opinion as well. BootinUp Nov 2017 #4
For now. Republicans already stole a SCOTUS seat... NYC Liberal Nov 2017 #13
"If Trump gets another, all bets are off and things will get very, very bad." LenaBaby61 Nov 2017 #16
Insane JDC Nov 2017 #2
This is how they pit people aganst one another RhodeIslandOne Nov 2017 #3
Isn't choice the law of the land?? Rhiannon12866 Nov 2017 #5
I think these assholes need to be required to adopt titaniumsalute Nov 2017 #6
Good idea. mdbl Nov 2017 #21
Forced birth, forced adoption HAB911 Nov 2017 #22
It should still be her body, her choice. No penalties for physicians performing a LEGAL procedure. Guilded Lilly Nov 2017 #7
God damn those intolerant idiots. PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2017 #8
Raising a child with a disability is one of the hardest things Ilsa Nov 2017 #9
Would Kasich sign it? Or is this just for show Freethinker65 Nov 2017 #10
A bill against the poor Dan Nov 2017 #11
If abortion is legal then it's legal to abort for whatever reason. xor Nov 2017 #12
Abortion tends to be unpleasant and expensive. Not something one would do for eye color dembotoz Nov 2017 #14
Choice is choice. eggplant Nov 2017 #15
So they want to force women not to only stay pregnant but stay pregnant Doreen Nov 2017 #17
More forced-birth idiocy. It is utterly unconstitutional. SunSeeker Nov 2017 #18
And yet, I see no language in this bill like "we will pay this child's medical costs for life." More_Cowbell Nov 2017 #19
Exactly. n/t area51 Nov 2017 #20
Exactly. Dems need to start offering "companion bills" that require DeminPennswoods Nov 2017 #23
It should be easy to calculate the cost of raising a child with Down's syndrome greymattermom Nov 2017 #24
Just mail the medical bills to the government ck4829 Nov 2017 #25

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
13. For now. Republicans already stole a SCOTUS seat...
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 11:29 PM
Nov 2017

If Trump gets another, all bets are off and things will get very, very bad.

LenaBaby61

(6,974 posts)
16. "If Trump gets another, all bets are off and things will get very, very bad."
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:26 AM
Nov 2017

Agreed. But then again, I think the court is gone with Gorsuch on it.

FORCING a woman to have a child with Down's is reprehensible. There will be women who'll do abortions on themselves. But, Rethuglican=reprehensible.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
21. Good idea.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 06:16 AM
Nov 2017

Since they are so into taking care of people with this syndrome, let's see them not look like hypocrites.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,862 posts)
8. God damn those intolerant idiots.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:52 PM
Nov 2017

This is a highly personal decision. If you're a personal friend of someone in this situation, maybe (but only maybe) you can weigh in here.

Otherwise, it's none of your beeswax.

When I was expecting my second child, and I'd be 38 when it would be born, I was offered pre-natal testing for Down syndrome. I chose not to do it, because I honestly felt that this was not the worst thing that could happen and that I could handle such a child. Again, a highly personal choice. As it turns out, the baby was as normal as any baby could be, and definitely did not have Down Syndrome. But I'd be the last person to tell another mother she should have such a baby.

Each one of us only knows our own life circumstances. None of us is ever entitled to judge others. Ever.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
9. Raising a child with a disability is one of the hardest things
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 10:58 PM
Nov 2017

to do. It helps if the parents are smart, have money, and/or are patient, but none of those things "fix" it. It still means your life is turned upside down. Nothing is the same - spiritual life, friendships, social life, work, and dynamics between parents' siblings, siblings of the disabled, are affected. Your time becomes someone else's for the rest of your life.

That these people should force this on families is cruel. It needs to be their choice.

xor

(1,204 posts)
12. If abortion is legal then it's legal to abort for whatever reason.
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 11:19 PM
Nov 2017

(in my opinion)

But that does bring up some interesting/hard questions and possible future issues. Are there any ethical issues with aborting a fetus based on other perceived undesirable traits? Let's say sex, or eye color, or the ability to test for intelligence or maybe sexual orientation. Now there are obvious differences between down syndrome and those traits I just listed, and I think most people can at least understand why people view those as different. But what about when comes to testing for other medical issues such as ADHD, autism, schizophrenia, or other debilitating conditions?

I tend to lean toward what I said in the subject line, but I am curious what others think on this. Not sure if this is a bit too "heavy" of a topic for DU, though. I don't want to offend or upset anyone here.

dembotoz

(16,808 posts)
14. Abortion tends to be unpleasant and expensive. Not something one would do for eye color
Wed Nov 1, 2017, 11:29 PM
Nov 2017

But if they did...not my body, not my choice

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
15. Choice is choice.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:24 AM
Nov 2017

It's not "get approval from other people" choice. Plain and simple.

There are women who use abortion as their primary form of birth control. That's their right. Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter.
There are women who choose to have severely disabled children. That's their right. Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter.
There are women who have ten kids. That's their right. Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter.
There are women who never want to have children. That's their right. Like it, don't like it, doesn't matter.

Choice is choice. Theirs, not anyone else's.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
17. So they want to force women not to only stay pregnant but stay pregnant
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:53 AM
Nov 2017

when they are going to have a disabled child that they would never have the money to support because the moment that baby is born you are on your own and that child will never have rights under this administration because anything for special learning will have gone out the door and if that child has some of the issues that most down syndrome children do you and that child is screwed. Trump and his goons hate the disabled yet they force women to have disabled children. Sounds pretty fucked to me.

SunSeeker

(51,571 posts)
18. More forced-birth idiocy. It is utterly unconstitutional.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:55 AM
Nov 2017

But the Ohio GOP is obviously trying to set up a Supreme Court challenge, in hopes of overturning or chipping away at Roe v. Wade. Fucking assholes.

And of course these GOP cretins are doing NOTHING to make it financially possible for a woman to have a disabled child when she does choose to do so. The GOP doesn't give a shit about Down syndrome children, just Down syndrome fetuses. To be even more precise, the GOP only cares about forcing women to give birth against their will.

More_Cowbell

(2,191 posts)
19. And yet, I see no language in this bill like "we will pay this child's medical costs for life."
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 03:59 AM
Nov 2017

All the conservatives care about is that that baby takes its first breath. After that, it's on its own.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
23. Exactly. Dems need to start offering "companion bills" that require
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 07:51 AM
Nov 2017

the state, i.e., all taxpayers, to finance all lifetime care costs for these kids. You can bet when it comes down to brass tacks, voters will choose abortion over potential tax increases every time.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
24. It should be easy to calculate the cost of raising a child with Down's syndrome
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 09:58 AM
Nov 2017

and to add that amount to state taxes. Put if right in the bill.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ohio House passes bill to...