Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 12:51 PM Nov 2017

Former MI6 Officer Steele Was Paid $168,000 For Dossier, Fusion GPS Says

Source: Talking Points Memo



By MATT SHUHAM Published NOVEMBER 2, 2017 11:24 AM

Former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele’s company was paid $168,000 for its work creating a dossier on Donald Trump, Reuters reported Thursday.

Citing a statement from the research firm that paid Steele’s company, Fusion GPS, Reuters reported that the money paid to Steele was part of $1.02 million in fees Fusion GPS had received from Perkins Coie, a law firm representing the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Prior to Democrats hiring Fusion GPS for research, conservatives funded the firm’s work: Editors of the conservative news site Washington Free Beacon admitted Saturday that the outlet first contracted Fusion GPS to research Trump during the 2016 Republican presidential primary. “We do not apologize for our methods,” they wrote. “The First Amendment guarantees our right to engage in news-gathering as we see fit.”

Donald Trump and congressional Republicans, however, have focused on Democrats’ work funding the research firm. On Sunday, Trump baselessly claimed the dossier cost $12 million.





Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/michael-steele-paid-168000-for-dossier
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
3. I read that BEFORE the dems
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:07 PM
Nov 2017

took it on, a copy was sent to McCain and others in the gop. THEY were very interested, but did not want to involve themselves in case it angered the "leaders" McConnell and Ryan.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
2. 1. Who paid does not matter. 2. Receiving info is not collusion. Quid pro quo is collusion.
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:07 PM
Nov 2017

What tRump did was not simply receiving info. It was coordinating an extensive disruptive interferential campaign by a foreign adversary against a US citizen and US party in a US election.

Trump's quid pro quo may have been providing analytic data (possibly from Cambridge Analytica), receiving advance knowledge of emails, lifting or not enforcing sanctions against Russia, possible money laundering for Russians, possible participation in the Rosneft $8 billion stock sale deal plus brokering thereof by Carter Page, and possible erasure of debts owed to Russian oligarchs.

Plus part of tRump's quid pro quo may have been acquiescing to blackmail by filing to run in the first place.

Justice

(7,188 posts)
8. If WSJ, NYT, WP, CNN, CBS, NBC, ABC had hired 1 reporter to focus on Trump's Russia ties,
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 01:57 PM
Nov 2017

Would have paid more than $168,000. This is peanuts.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
10. The Dotard tweeting Fake News ($12,000,000).
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:02 PM
Nov 2017

The present occupant of the White House is a pathological liar, and a two-bit TV celebrity hustler.

Nothing more.

Thank you, you deplorable assholes.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
11. Yeah Donnie, I'm sure your little cult of Faux-Bots and Dittoheads are massively outraged ...
Thu Nov 2, 2017, 02:33 PM
Nov 2017

... and calling for 'investigations' cause ZOMG NASTY CORRUPT HILLARY!!!

However, the actual pseudo-grown-ups on Capitol Hill are all well-aware that there's absolutely nothing illegal or even untoward about what the Clinton Campaign did, that it happens ALL THE TIME in politics, and most have done the exact same kind of thing in their own campaigns.

You can fairly well count on virtually none of them doing jack shit about it ... sure maybe a toady like Rohrbacher or a nutter like Steve King will make some ridiculous public statement at some point, implying she did something wrong ... but there ain't be any 'investigation of the investigation' in Congress. Bet on that ...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former MI6 Officer Steele...