Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,256 posts)
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 10:07 PM Nov 2017

Inside story: How Russians hacked the Democrats emails

Source: AP

While U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Russia was behind the email thefts, the AP drew on forensic data to report Thursday that the hackers known as Fancy Bear were closely aligned with the interests of the Russian government.

The AP’s reconstruction— based on a database of 19,000 malicious links recently shared by cybersecurity firm Secureworks — shows how the hackers worked their way around the Clinton campaign’s top-of-the-line digital security to steal chairman John Podesta’s emails in March 2016.

It also helps explain how a Russian-linked intermediary could boast to a Trump policy adviser, a month later, that the Kremlin had “thousands of emails” worth of dirt on Clinton.

. . .

But there were signs of dishonesty from the start. The first document Guccifer 2.0 published on June 15 came not from the DNC as advertised but from Podesta’s inbox , according to a former DNC official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the press.

The official said the word “CONFIDENTIAL” was not in the original document .

Guccifer 2.0 had airbrushed it to catch reporters’ attention.



Read more: https://www.apnews.com/dea73efc01594839957c3c9a6c962b8a/Inside-story:-How-Russians-hacked-the-Democrats'-emails

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inside story: How Russians hacked the Democrats emails (Original Post) CousinIT Nov 2017 OP
And Trump went along w/it too Botany Nov 2017 #1
Thanks for posting. Kick and Rec emulatorloo Nov 2017 #2
Who's in charge of cyber-security at the DNC? FakeNoose Nov 2017 #3
They were doing the right things. They were no easy target... CousinIT Nov 2017 #4
If an adversary is well funded and very persistent... paleotn Nov 2017 #5
Yep. That's the truth. n/t CousinIT Nov 2017 #6
kick FreeStateDemocrat Nov 2017 #7

FakeNoose

(32,726 posts)
3. Who's in charge of cyber-security at the DNC?
Fri Nov 3, 2017, 10:54 PM
Nov 2017

Nobody noticed this over a year ago? Wow! This isn't good at all.



CousinIT

(9,256 posts)
4. They were doing the right things. They were no easy target...
Sat Nov 4, 2017, 01:41 AM
Nov 2017
The Clinton campaign was no easy target; several former employees said the organization put particular stress on digital safety.

Work emails were protected by two-factor authentication, a technique that uses a second passcode to keep accounts secure. Most messages were deleted after 30 days and staff went through phishing drills. Security awareness even followed the campaigners into the bathroom, where someone put a picture of a toothbrush under the words: “You shouldn’t share your passwords either.”

Two-factor authentication may have slowed the hackers, but it didn’t stop them. After repeated attempts to break into various staffers’ hillaryclinton.com accounts, the hackers turned to the personal Gmail addresses. It was there on March 19 that they targeted top Clinton lieutenants — including campaign manager Robby Mook, senior adviser Jake Sullivan and political fixer Philippe Reines.

A malicious link was generated for Podesta at 11:28 a.m. Moscow time, the AP found. Documents subsequently published by WikiLeaks show that the rogue email arrived in his inbox six minutes later. The link was clicked twice.

Podesta’s messages — at least 50,000 of them — were in the hackers’ hands.

paleotn

(17,946 posts)
5. If an adversary is well funded and very persistent...
Sat Nov 4, 2017, 10:44 AM
Nov 2017

there isn't a system invented by the mind of humans that isn't hackable. There's no such thing in the digital world as perfectly safe. That's the world we live in.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Inside story: How Russian...