Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 08:28 AM Nov 2017

Trump Jr. Hinted at Review of Anti-Russia Law, Moscow Lawyer Says

Source: Bloomberg




By Irina Reznik and Henry Meyer
November 6, 2017, 4:01 AM EST

A Russian lawyer who met with President Donald Trump’s oldest son last year says he indicated that a law targeting Russia could be re-examined if his father won the election and asked her for written evidence that illegal proceeds went to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

The lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya, said in a two-and-a-half-hour interview in Moscow that she would tell these and other things to the Senate Judiciary Committee on condition that her answers be made public, something it hasn’t agreed to. She has received scores of questions from the committee, which is investigating possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Veselnitskaya said she’s also ready -- if asked -- to testify to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

Her June 9, 2016 encounter with Donald Trump Jr., President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and then campaign manager Paul Manafort in New York plays a key role in allegations that the campaign worked with Russia to defeat Clinton. Veselnitskaya said she went to New York to show Trump campaign officials that major Democratic donors had evaded U.S. taxes and to lobby against the so-called Magnitsky law that punishes Russian officials for the murder of a Russian tax accountant who accused the Kremlin of corruption.

‘If We Come to Power’

“Looking ahead, if we come to power, we can return to this issue and think what to do about it,’’ Trump Jr. said of the 2012 law, she recalled. “I understand our side may have messed up, but it’ll take a long time to get to the bottom of it,” he added, according to her.



Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-06/trump-jr-said-anti-russia-law-may-be-reviewed-moscow-lawyer-says

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump Jr. Hinted at Review of Anti-Russia Law, Moscow Lawyer Says (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2017 OP
Selling US foreign policy MaryMagdaline Nov 2017 #1
And with Trump not enforcing the sanctions Mr. Ected Nov 2017 #2
LOCK HIM UP SHRED Nov 2017 #3
So funny that the Russians have no patience and turn on the Dumps so fast. Madam45for2923 Nov 2017 #4
It's collusion of course. But it's also kompromat. The Russians own DJT because of this. nt wiggs Nov 2017 #5
Quid Pro Quo avebury Nov 2017 #6
She wants to be invited to testify publicly so she can reverse herself and lie through her teeth. pnwmom Nov 2017 #7
Quid pro Quo Gothmog Nov 2017 #8
Veselnitskaya, said ...that she would tell these ...things to the Senate Judiciary Committee... lagomorph777 Nov 2017 #9

MaryMagdaline

(6,855 posts)
1. Selling US foreign policy
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 08:43 AM
Nov 2017

This is the quid pro quo. OR, this is the lesson in why you don't meet with Russians without notifying State Department or FBI. Because even if you don't betray your country, they will say that you did.

Idiots and traitors.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
6. Quid Pro Quo
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 10:55 AM
Nov 2017

You put my father in the Oval Office and we will make your Oligarch's problems go away by doing away with the Anti-Russia Law. Sure sounds like collusion.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
7. She wants to be invited to testify publicly so she can reverse herself and lie through her teeth.
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 11:01 AM
Nov 2017

She should NOT be trusted.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
9. Veselnitskaya, said ...that she would tell these ...things to the Senate Judiciary Committee...
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 12:59 PM
Nov 2017

on condition that her answers be made public, something it hasn’t agreed to.

McTurdle is clearly implicated and terrified about what she'll say.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Jr. Hinted at Revie...