Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 02:51 PM Nov 2017

UK Regulator Finds Fox News' Hannity, Carlson Breached Impartiality Standards

Source: Talking Points Memo




By CAITLIN MACNEAL Published NOVEMBER 6, 2017 1:23 PM

The British government’s communications regulator ruled on Monday that the Fox News programs anchored by Sean Hannity and Tucker Carlson breached the UK’s impartiality rules in segments that aired earlier this year.

The regulator, Ofcom, found that the segments did not provide adequate view points even as opinion programs and therefore broke “due impartiality” standards.

The ruling comes as the British government considers 21st Century Fox’s — the parent company of Fox News — bid to buy British outlet Sky News. Fox has faced significant scrutiny from British regulators after top officials at Fox resigned amid sexual harassment allegations and Fox News faced a lawsuit alleging that the network worked with members of the Trump administration to push a conspiracy theory about a murder DNC staffer.

In September, Ofcom found that “alleged behaviors” at 21st Century Fox were “concerning,” but said that their findings did not warrant additional review. Ofcom also reviewed programs like “Hannity” and “Tucker Carlson Tonight” due to complaints about the programs, but found that the shows did not have to meet a “due accuracy requirement” since they are not news programs. The British competition watchdog is now reviewing the proposed merger.

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/british-regulator-hannity-carlson-fox-breached-impartiality-rules

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sandensea

(21,636 posts)
3. That took long enough
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 03:02 PM
Nov 2017

They've only been outdoing Goebbels for 20 years - and for close to 40 years in the U.K.

Better late than never I guess.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
6. Fairness Doctrine always applied only to broadcast.
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 04:17 PM
Nov 2017

Since the over-the-air radio/TV spectrum theoretically belongs to the people (at least, the part of the spectrum set aside by the FCC for public broadcasts, which is getting smaller and smaller).

Since Hannity and company are delivered over cable, which private interests pay for, those clowns can say, and have said, anything they want.

If the Fairness Doctrine were brought back, we might only hope that it would curtail radio goons like The Savage Weiner and Rush Limbaugh, as well as make the broadcast channels (ABC, CBS, FOX entertainment) more honest.

The FCC under the Reagan administration devastated the quality and usefulness of TV and radio in this country. Infomercials didn't exist prior to the mid-80s. Now they seem to be 70% or more of what anyone sees or listens to. The changes they made also opened the door to another present plague on society: prescription pharmaceutical ads. These ads were approved by the FDA under Bill Clinton in 1997. Now your nightly network evening newscast is sponsored by multinational companies who are literally pushing drugs.

diva77

(7,643 posts)
7. I didn't realize cable wasn't covered by the defunct Fairness Doctrine - thanks for the info.
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 04:24 PM
Nov 2017

We need something more powerful than the Fairness Doctrine!

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
9. As the article mentions, they are not news programs. They don't have to be "impartial"
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 05:35 PM
Nov 2017

Like them or not, they can have the shows. Just like Olberman had one and O'Donnell etc

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
13. But it says they're not violating anything since they're not news
Mon Nov 6, 2017, 06:53 PM
Nov 2017

So I guess its pretty much a worthless article!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UK Regulator Finds Fox Ne...