Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bathroommonkey76

(3,827 posts)
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:27 PM Nov 2017

First on CNN: Trump admin taking quiet steps on seizing border land, report says

Source: CNN

Washington (CNN)- Although approval for a new border wall has yet to come, the Trump administration has taken subtle steps to be able to seize land to build one, including by restarting litigation that has laid dormant for years against landowners, according to a new report from Senate Democrats.

Roughly two-thirds of the US-Mexico border runs through private or state-owned lands, meaning the federal government would need to purchase, seize or seek permission to use land in order to build a border wall. Based on efforts a decade ago to build border fencing, that process is likely to cost the government millions and could take years of complex litigation.

And it appears the administration is gearing up for it.

Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee produced a report on eminent domain and a border wall on Monday, citing the administration's lack of clarity about what would be required to build President Donald Trump's proposed wall.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/13/politics/border-wall-eminent-domain/index.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First on CNN: Trump admin taking quiet steps on seizing border land, report says (Original Post) bathroommonkey76 Nov 2017 OP
Trump l-o-o-o-o-v-e-s eminent domain. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2017 #1
Yes. This is one of Trump's wet dreams. He can FINALLY use emminent domain for his own benefit!nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #3
As I've asked before... TBA Nov 2017 #2
The wall is bad for wildlife. But Republicans don't care about wildlife except for hunting them. nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #6
The irony in this is I'm sure most of that land belongs to Republicans. Honeycombe8 Nov 2017 #4
Yep bathroommonkey76 Nov 2017 #5
Wonder how much his supporters are willing to put up with? n/t woodsprite Nov 2017 #7
They will hand their MontanaMama Nov 2017 #8
fuck 'em if they're so ignorant and stupid as to vote for them... gopiscrap Nov 2017 #9
They'd steal your shoes if they could get away with it bucolic_frolic Nov 2017 #10

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,613 posts)
1. Trump l-o-o-o-o-v-e-s eminent domain.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:38 PM
Nov 2017

The art of the attempted steal:

Vera Coking is a retired homeowner whose Atlantic City, New Jersey boarding house was the focus of a eminent domain case involving Donald Trump.



Coking house at 127 S Columbia Pl, between the steel framework of the planned Penthouse Casino; photographed by Jack Boucher for Historic American Buildings Survey, c.1991

History

In 1961, Coking and her husband bought the property at 127 South Columbia Place as a summertime retreat for $20,000.

In the 1970s, Penthouse magazine publisher Bob Guccione offered Coking $1 million for her property in order to build the Penthouse Boardwalk Hotel and Casino. She declined the offer, and Guccione started construction of the hotel-casino in 1978 around the Coking house, but ran out of money in 1980 and construction stopped. The steel framework structure was finally torn down in 1993.

In 1993, Donald Trump bought several lots around his Atlantic City casino and hotel, intending to build a parking lot designed for limousines. Coking, who had lived in her house at that time for 32 years, refused to sell. As a result, the city condemned her house, using the power of eminent domain. She was offered $251,000, which was about one quarter of what she was offered by Guccione 10 years earlier.

TBA

(825 posts)
2. As I've asked before...
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:38 PM
Nov 2017

We will be basically ceding the Rio Grande to Mexico, cutting of access to the agricultural interest that use it (not to mention the wildlife..).

Amirite?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
6. The wall is bad for wildlife. But Republicans don't care about wildlife except for hunting them. nt
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:44 PM
Nov 2017

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
4. The irony in this is I'm sure most of that land belongs to Republicans.
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 04:40 PM
Nov 2017

Either private landowners, and of course red states Bwahahahahaha. They voted for the govt to take their own land. You gotta love the irony.

MontanaMama

(23,337 posts)
8. They will hand their
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 06:02 PM
Nov 2017

land over to him and think they are patriots. He's probably making promises he will never keep.

gopiscrap

(23,765 posts)
9. fuck 'em if they're so ignorant and stupid as to vote for them...
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 06:30 PM
Nov 2017

then they get what they get...no sympathy here

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»First on CNN: Trump admin...