Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:16 PM Nov 2017

Sessions casts doubt on need for Hillary Clinton special counsel

Source: Politico




By KYLE CHENEY 11/14/2017 11:19 AM EST

UPDATE 12:02 p.m.:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions, pressed by Republicans Tuesday on why the Department of Justice has not appointed a special counsel to investigate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, said the facts needed to justify one before his department would act.

"'Looks like' is not enough basis to appoint a special counsel," Sessions said.

ORIGINAL STORY:

Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Tuesday it would be inappropriate for the president to direct him to target a political rival, after the Justice Department released a letter hinting at the prospect of investigating years-old matters connected to Democrat Hillary Clinton.

"I have not been improperly influenced and would not be improperly influenced" by President Donald Trump, Sessions said during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/jeff-sessions-no-trump-influence-doj-clinton-244885?lo=ap_b1

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sessions casts doubt on need for Hillary Clinton special counsel (Original Post) DonViejo Nov 2017 OP
It's all deflection from Cheeto FakeNoose Nov 2017 #1
Surprising to me Cirque du So-What Nov 2017 #2
Yes. Using the JD to persecute the Democratic candidate for president Hortensis Nov 2017 #13
Gosh, I know politicians lie, but shit Iliyah Nov 2017 #3
Its less about lying than it is about keeping an issue alive that fires up the Republican base. LonePirate Nov 2017 #4
Do not be fooled, Wellstone ruled Nov 2017 #5
Clinton's what? What possession are you using the apostrophe to refer to? Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #6
Short answer is, Wellstone ruled Nov 2017 #8
Possessive uses apostrophe. Plural does not. Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2017 #10
Okay,so corrected. Wellstone ruled Nov 2017 #11
I caught the end of Gowdy's comments. He is self-rightous thug! riversedge Nov 2017 #7
I think its stlll in their back pocket LiberalLovinLug Nov 2017 #9
I hear right wing heads exploding Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2017 #12

FakeNoose

(32,734 posts)
1. It's all deflection from Cheeto
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:20 PM
Nov 2017

I give Jeff Sessions credit for figuring that out.
He's in enough trouble already, no need to go looking for more.



Cirque du So-What

(25,970 posts)
2. Surprising to me
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:22 PM
Nov 2017

I fully expected lickspittle lapdog Jeffy Bo to jump on the opportunity. Guess the accusations against Hillary Clinton are so specious that even Sessions can't support appointing SC.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. Yes. Using the JD to persecute the Democratic candidate for president
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 04:58 PM
Nov 2017

would be a far bigger scandal than Moore. There's no case. It's all nonsense, and investigation would prove that and even provide her another 13-hour showcase to show them up for corrupt fools, if they were stupid enough to do twice. Which they are, of course.

Sessions actually has a little subspecialty in abuse of power to railroad people into prison, but I'm guessing a bunch of right-wing leaders contacted him to make sure he doesn't touch it.

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
4. Its less about lying than it is about keeping an issue alive that fires up the Republican base.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:36 PM
Nov 2017

I suspect most Republicans in DC know there is no case for linking Clinton to the Russsians via Uranium One or Ukraine or whatever. However, the Republican base is angry about it because right wing media is pressing the baseless conspiracy theories as a way to distract from the 45-Russia investigations. As we have seen time and again, the right wing base drives the media narrative far more than the left wing base drives it.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. Do not be fooled,
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 01:43 PM
Nov 2017

Trump and his Rethug Party are going after Clinton's. Notice I say Clinton's. Gowdy was the final tell.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,034 posts)
6. Clinton's what? What possession are you using the apostrophe to refer to?
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:00 PM
Nov 2017

Which Clinton (singular)? Which one of the Clintons (plural) owns something that tRump wants?

You asked us to notice that you wrote Clinton's with an apostrophe. Twice.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
8. Short answer is,
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:31 PM
Nov 2017

Bill and Hillary Clinton. When the one Congress Person held up a copy of Sessions accusations against Bill Clinton,Sessions was pissed that his own words came back to haunt. It is all about destroying the Clinton's and any and all of their accomplishments.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,034 posts)
10. Possessive uses apostrophe. Plural does not.
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:36 PM
Nov 2017

You have it reversed:

Trump and his Rethug Party are going after Clinton's. Notice I say Clinton's.

Bill and Hillary Clinton. When the one Congress Person held up a copy of Sessions accusations against Bill Clinton,Sessions was pissed that his own words came back to haunt. It is all about destroying the Clinton's and any and all of their accomplishments.


Plural: becomes --> going after Clintons
Plural: --> Notice I say Clintons
Possessive:     --> Sessions' accusations
Plural:     --> the Clintons

LiberalLovinLug

(14,176 posts)
9. I think its stlll in their back pocket
Tue Nov 14, 2017, 02:34 PM
Nov 2017

They have been too busy...dismantling every last good thing Obama did. And pushing through their 'tax reform' to secure a bigger slice of the pie. Once most of the dirty work is done, then we may see yet another Clinton investigation.

Because we have seen in the past, they have no qualms about spending taxpayers money on pointless, drawn out baseless investigations on Democrats before. Because it works on a large segment. Where there's smoke there's fire. And with RW radio and Fox News to shape the narrative each day, making it look like they are guilty even before the hearings conclude, they can still damage Democrats and fire up their own base.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sessions casts doubt on n...