Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,649 posts)
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 08:04 PM Dec 2017

Agriculture Dept. to give states more control over food stamps

Source: Politico

By POLITICO STAFF
 12/05/2017 06:38 PM EST

The U.S. Department of Agriculture signaled plans Tuesday to give states greater flexibility over how they administer food stamps, potentially opening the door to stricter work requirements or drug testing on recipients.

The announcement comes as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker announced he will move ahead with drug testing able-bodied adults applying for food stamps, something the Obama administration had successfully blocked in the past.

The USDA released a vaguely worded letter this afternoon outlining principles to promote self-sufficiency and discourage waste, fraud and abuse in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, a more than $70 billion program that aids roughly one in eight Americans.

"USDA intends to offer state agencies greater local control over SNAP, the safety net program that serves millions of eligible, low-income individuals and families," the department said in a statement. "Specifics on such flexibilities will be communicated to state agencies in the coming weeks."

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/05/agriculture-food-stamps-281671



(Short article, no more at link.)
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agriculture Dept. to give states more control over food stamps (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2017 OP
Translation: sandensea Dec 2017 #1
Guns are only for law abiding citizens, so they will be white either way in their eyes. nt Lucky Luciano Dec 2017 #4
Eventually they will gut SNAP BumRushDaShow Dec 2017 #2
But bet they won't touch not fooled Dec 2017 #3
Sustainable Cowboys or Welfare Ranchers of the American West? StarryNite Dec 2017 #5
We won't need food stamps when we start getting our big tax-cut refund checks progree Dec 2017 #6

sandensea

(21,688 posts)
1. Translation:
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 08:15 PM
Dec 2017

in GOP states, food stamps are to be available to gun owners only - unless your skin color is a little too dark for comfort.

BumRushDaShow

(129,662 posts)
2. Eventually they will gut SNAP
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 08:25 PM
Dec 2017

when the Farm Bill comes up for renewal next year. They must find more $$$ to give to the 1%.

not fooled

(5,803 posts)
3. But bet they won't touch
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 08:33 PM
Dec 2017

welfare for puke-voting rich farmers, aka crop subsidies.

ol' sonny was installed to ensure that usda helps out only certain sectors.

Back to the future, indeed.



StarryNite

(9,461 posts)
5. Sustainable Cowboys or Welfare Ranchers of the American West?
Tue Dec 5, 2017, 09:39 PM
Dec 2017

Sustainable Cowboys or Welfare Ranchers of the American West?

Five hundred million dollars[1]. That’s what 21,000[2] ranchers who graze their livestock on America’s iconic western rangelands are estimated to have cost US taxpayers in 2014 — and every year for the past decade. This averages out to an annual taxpayer subsidy of $23,809 per rancher — approximately a quarter of a million dollars each since 2005. So why does this small subset, representing just 2.7% of US livestock producers, protest the “welfare rancher” label?

The public lands grazing program is welfare.

That $23,809 — and it’s a lowball figure — is a form of public assistance similar to other welfare programs. The only difference is, it doesn’t arrive as a check in the mail. It instead represents a loss covered by taxpayers: the very large difference between what public lands ranchers pay in fees to the US government and what public lands grazing costs taxpayers every year. But it’s still a subsidy, as a newly updated economic analysis, Costs and Consequences: The Real Price of Livestock Grazing on America’s Public Lands, makes clear. And the recipients aren’t low income; a large number are millionaires and some are billionaires and multi-billion dollar corporations on Forbes various “rich lists”. Cattle barons, if you will.

[link:http://dailypitchfork.org/?p=631|

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Agriculture Dept. to give...