FBI email: Sessions wasn't required to disclose foreign contacts for security clearance
Source: MSN/CNN
A newly released document shows that the FBI told an aide to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that Sessions wasn't required to disclose foreign contacts that occurred in the course of carrying out his government duties when he was a senator.
The FBI email from March bolsters the explanation by the Justice Department for why Sessions didn't disclose contacts with the Russian ambassador in his application for a US security clearance. When the omission of the foreign contacts on the form was first reported by CNN in May, the Justice Department said Sessions' office was advised by the FBI that he didn't need to disclose the meetings.
An FBI agent, whose name isn't made public in the document released by the bureau, was responding in March to a query from Sessions' assistant. The assistant sought confirmation of what she said was an earlier conversation on the matter. At the time, news of Sessions' Russian contacts had recently become public and prompted fierce political criticism.
The agent didn't recall the earlier conversation but affirmed that "he was not required to list foreign government contacts while in official government business unless he developed personal relationships from such contacts."
Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-email-sessions-wasnt-required-to-disclose-foreign-contacts-for-security-clearance/ar-BBGwyLg?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE01DHP
Here no evil, speak no evil...
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)The question on the form is: "do you have close and continuing contact with foreign nationals with whom you, your spouse or an immediate family member are bound by affection, influence or obligation." If you met the person once or twice, it isn't "close and continuing"
Eyeball_Kid
(7,432 posts)On official government business was never the issue. It was when he was representing the campaign thats the issue.
turbinetree
(24,703 posts)employer that if you contact or the Russians or anyone contacts you that it doesn't mean anything, even if you are given a secret clearance up to top secret..........................that it doesn't mean anything, I smell BS.
Just because he is a senator, whats makes him so fucking special...............I mean really, did he not state and swear that he would defend and protect the Constitution and the country from foreign powers
We were told that we would be brought in for questioning if someone made contact, or if we reported some foreign power that made contact because of the clearance being given and the project................
bluestarone
(16,972 posts)TOTAL BULLSHIT
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)When Jeff Sessions testifies today before the Senate Intelligence Committee, hell face tough questions about whether he committed perjury the last time he spoke to the Senate. And as of this morning, Sessionss alibi suddenly looks a lot less plausible.
During Sessionss confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, he told Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) that I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in (the Trump campaign), and I did not have communications with the Russians.
The Washington Post later reported that Sessionss remarks (spoken under oath) werent quite true: He had at least two meetings with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the months leading up to the presidential election. Sessions strenuously denied hed committed perjury in his confirmation hearings because he maintained hed met with Kislyak as a senator, not as an adviser to presidential candidate Trump.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/13/15790198/sessions-meeting-ambassadors-russia
And, as we have amply seen, that claim was bullshit then too.
AnnieBW
(10,428 posts)Shit... usually the security clearance people bust your ass for just talking to a foreign national on-line!