Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 11:47 PM Dec 2017

FBI email: Sessions wasn't required to disclose foreign contacts for security clearance

Source: MSN/CNN

A newly released document shows that the FBI told an aide to Attorney General Jeff Sessions that Sessions wasn't required to disclose foreign contacts that occurred in the course of carrying out his government duties when he was a senator.

The FBI email from March bolsters the explanation by the Justice Department for why Sessions didn't disclose contacts with the Russian ambassador in his application for a US security clearance. When the omission of the foreign contacts on the form was first reported by CNN in May, the Justice Department said Sessions' office was advised by the FBI that he didn't need to disclose the meetings.

An FBI agent, whose name isn't made public in the document released by the bureau, was responding in March to a query from Sessions' assistant. The assistant sought confirmation of what she said was an earlier conversation on the matter. At the time, news of Sessions' Russian contacts had recently become public and prompted fierce political criticism.

The agent didn't recall the earlier conversation but affirmed that "he was not required to list foreign government contacts while in official government business unless he developed personal relationships from such contacts."


Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fbi-email-sessions-wasnt-required-to-disclose-foreign-contacts-for-security-clearance/ar-BBGwyLg?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE01DHP



Here no evil, speak no evil...
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI email: Sessions wasn't required to disclose foreign contacts for security clearance (Original Post) TomCADem Dec 2017 OP
then why lie about it? leftofcool Dec 2017 #1
Not listing it is not lying about it Tiggeroshii Dec 2017 #5
Sessions behaviors when acting Eyeball_Kid Dec 2017 #2
Really, so I guess when I got a government job that was classified and was told by turbinetree Dec 2017 #3
i don't care still bluestarone Dec 2017 #4
Not sure how this is news - they made the claim the meetings were related to his Senate role before. FreepFryer Dec 2017 #6
WTF? AnnieBW Dec 2017 #7
 

Tiggeroshii

(11,088 posts)
5. Not listing it is not lying about it
Mon Dec 11, 2017, 12:25 AM
Dec 2017

The question on the form is: "do you have close and continuing contact with foreign nationals with whom you, your spouse or an immediate family member are bound by affection, influence or obligation." If you met the person once or twice, it isn't "close and continuing"

Eyeball_Kid

(7,432 posts)
2. Sessions behaviors when acting
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 11:55 PM
Dec 2017

On official government business was never the issue. It was when he was representing the campaign that’s the issue.

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
3. Really, so I guess when I got a government job that was classified and was told by
Sun Dec 10, 2017, 11:55 PM
Dec 2017

employer that if you contact or the Russians or anyone contacts you that it doesn't mean anything, even if you are given a secret clearance up to top secret..........................that it doesn't mean anything, I smell BS.

Just because he is a senator, whats makes him so fucking special...............I mean really, did he not state and swear that he would defend and protect the Constitution and the country from foreign powers

We were told that we would be brought in for questioning if someone made contact, or if we reported some foreign power that made contact because of the clearance being given and the project................


FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
6. Not sure how this is news - they made the claim the meetings were related to his Senate role before.
Mon Dec 11, 2017, 12:35 AM
Dec 2017
Sessions met with a bunch of ambassadors after joining the Trump campaign — and they weren’t seeking him out as a senator. (Jun 13, 2017)

When Jeff Sessions testifies today before the Senate Intelligence Committee, he’ll face tough questions about whether he committed perjury the last time he spoke to the Senate. And as of this morning, Sessions’s alibi suddenly looks a lot less plausible.

During Sessions’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, he told Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) that “I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in (the Trump campaign), and I did not have communications with the Russians.”

The Washington Post later reported that Sessions’s remarks (spoken under oath) weren’t quite true: He had at least two meetings with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the months leading up to the presidential election. Sessions strenuously denied he’d committed perjury in his confirmation hearings — because he maintained he’d met with Kislyak as a senator, not as an adviser to presidential candidate Trump.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/13/15790198/sessions-meeting-ambassadors-russia


And, as we have amply seen, that claim was bullshit then too.

AnnieBW

(10,428 posts)
7. WTF?
Mon Dec 11, 2017, 09:59 PM
Dec 2017

Shit... usually the security clearance people bust your ass for just talking to a foreign national on-line!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI email: Sessions wasn'...