Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 11:19 AM Dec 2017

Procter & Gamble placed nearly identical op-eds pushing for corporate tax cuts

Source: Media Matters

Procter & Gamble has been placing virtually identical op-eds supposedly written by different authors arguing for corporate tax cuts in newspapers across the country. In comments to Media Matters, some of the editors of those newspapers criticized the company for their tactics, with one saying the company would be blacklisted from the paper.

In recent weeks, the company has been helping place op-eds by manufacturing plant managers across the country in their respective newspapers that tout the alleged benefits of cutting corporate taxes to the economy (numerous economists disagree). While those op-eds all have different authors, they are virtually the same except for a few sentences about the P&G plant in the area. The North Carolina-based website Greensboro 101 first noted the similarities in a December 11 post. (Thanks to reader R.K. for passing on the information.)

Those op-eds are:
•A November 24 op-ed in the Green Bay Press-Gazette (WI) by Green Bay plant manager Dan Lloyd. (Update: The publication has since added an editor's note to the top of the piece.)
•A November 25 op-ed in The Salt Lake Tribune (UT) by Box Elder manager Joe Tomon.
•A December 5 op-ed in the Southeast Missourian by Cape Girardeau plant managers Jack Geissinger and Tim Hayner.
•A December 6 op-ed in The Times-Tribune (Scranton, PA) by Mehoopany plant managers Laszlo Varga and Jose Manuel Sanchez.
•A December 10 op-ed in the News & Record by (Greensboro, NC) Greensboro plant managers Kevin Hazel and John Sorjonen. (The paper has since added an editor’s note.)

P&G defended the op-eds in the following statement to Media Matters (the statement also appeared in the News & Record):

"When P&G decided to promote the benefits of corporate tax reform, we encouraged most of our U.S. plant managers to write Op-Eds or Letters to the Editor for their local newspapers. Many accepted. Working as a team, a format was devised that was consistent and accurate. The fact that many of our plant managers, from all over the country, agreed on the content further demonstrates that corporate tax reform is a necessity to keep U.S. companies competitive in the global market. This topic impacts every P&G business and manufacturing site, and we appreciate the leadership of our plant managers."



Read more: Link tohttps://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2017/12/13/procter-gamble-placed-nearly-identical-op-eds-pushing-corporate-tax-cuts-different-authors-numerous/218832 source



What is it going to take for the majority of Americans to get off their asses and start shutting companies like this down with boycotts and protests?

Why is there a single "right-wing" local radio station in a "blue" city that doesn't have 10,000 people marching in front of their doors?

They (the 0.000001%) have declared WAR on us. It's way past time to fight the hell back!

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Procter & Gamble placed nearly identical op-eds pushing for corporate tax cuts (Original Post) maxrandb Dec 2017 OP
bull AllaN01Bear Dec 2017 #1
very curious what "bull" means rurallib Dec 2017 #2
Here, sign this paper allowing us to use your name ... aggiesal Dec 2017 #3
Yes, can't you just imagine maxrandb Dec 2017 #6
Precisely dalton99a Dec 2017 #10
I Can See It ProfessorGAC Dec 2017 #11
Yes an internally circulated 'letter like this" Kimchijeon Dec 2017 #12
Products truthisfreedom Dec 2017 #4
Et tu, Pampers? Et tu? These deceptive corporations are out of hand. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #5
I believe it has a huge affect on the economy ... aggiesal Dec 2017 #7
I think it'll take longer, going by the Bush tax cut bill with deregulation. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #8
Reagan's took about 4 months. n/t aggiesal Dec 2017 #9
Uh-uh. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #13

rurallib

(62,423 posts)
2. very curious what "bull" means
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 12:01 PM
Dec 2017

Do you believe meadiamatters is "bull" for reporting this or P&G is "bull" for doing this?

aggiesal

(8,918 posts)
3. Here, sign this paper allowing us to use your name ...
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 12:03 PM
Dec 2017

in an op-ed letter to your local paper, that we'll write for you, or you'll be fired.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
6. Yes, can't you just imagine
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 07:30 PM
Dec 2017

One of the plant managers saying; hey I really don't agree with the corporate tax cut?

ProfessorGAC

(65,076 posts)
11. I Can See It
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 02:41 PM
Dec 2017

A plant manager is not some high fallutin' zillion dollar a year job. A very good gig? Yes. But responsibility over a 24/7 operation can also big one giant pain in the rear.

I can see some plant managers believing that it isn't really something they care about or wish to stand behind.

That said, they have LOTS of sites in the US. The managers who did believe in it could be those that put their name on it. While an equal or greater number decided they didn't want to be part of it.

Notice that for all their locations, there isn't a op-ed referenced for each... It was a half dozen out of more than 30.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
5. Et tu, Pampers? Et tu? These deceptive corporations are out of hand.
Thu Dec 14, 2017, 12:05 PM
Dec 2017

Besides which, tax cuts have MINIMAL, if any, effect on the economy. It helps the corporation's bottom line, but they don't pour that money back into the company. They invest and hoard it, give out officer bonuses, and the like.

aggiesal

(8,918 posts)
7. I believe it has a huge affect on the economy ...
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 12:02 PM
Dec 2017

We will go into a recession within 6 months of the tax cuts taking effect.

You heard it here 1st.
Well, maybe 2nd or 3rd even.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. I think it'll take longer, going by the Bush tax cut bill with deregulation.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 12:52 PM
Dec 2017

I think it took several years. Time for the fraud to kick in and be realized.

How people can still fall for this stuff, after we've been through this more than once.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
13. Uh-uh.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 05:18 PM
Dec 2017

The economy was already in deep trouble. That's why Reagan was elected by a landslide.

There were 2 tax cut bills. We were IN some sort of kerfuffle in the economy....runamok interest rates, double digit inflation, real estate affected, car sales affected, unemployment, gas shortages...soon after Reagan took office.

I think the Reagan tax cuts added to the problem, by adding to the deficit, but it didn't cause the economic problems.

Not sure about the 2nd tax cut bill. I don't think there was another recession that soon after the first.

The NBER considers a very short recession to have occurred in 1980, followed by a short period of growth and then a deep recession. Unemployment remained relatively elevated in between recessions. The recession began as the Federal Reserve, under Paul Volcker, raised interest rates dramatically to fight the inflation of the 1970s. The early '80s are sometimes referred to as a "double-dip" or "W-shaped" recession.

(Recession 1980 recession Jan–July 1980 lasted 6 months)

The Iranian Revolution sharply increased the price of oil around the world in 1979, causing the 1979 energy crisis. This was caused by the new regime in power in Iran, which exported oil at inconsistent intervals and at a lower volume, forcing prices up. Tight monetary policy in the United States to control inflation led to another recession. The changes were made largely because of inflation carried over from the previous decade because of the 1973 oil crisis and the 1979 energy crisis.

(Recession 1981–1982 recession July 1981 – Nov 1982 Lasted 1 year 4 months)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recessions_in_the_United_States#Great_Depression_onward

SECOND REAGAN TAX CUTS: Tax Reform Act of 1986
Next recession: Early 1990s recession in the United States July 1990 – Mar 1991 Lasted 8 months

After the lengthy peacetime expansion of the 1980s, inflation began to increase and the Federal Reserve responded by raising interest rates from 1986 to 1989. This weakened but did not stop growth, but some combination of the subsequent 1990 oil price shock, the debt accumulation of the 1980s, and growing consumer pessimism combined with the weakened economy to produce a brief recession.


We then had the Clinton Years:
The 1990s were the longest period of growth in American history.


We don't have another recession until another Republican takes office: George W. Bush.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Procter & Gamble placed n...