Dem James Mackler 'Stepping Back' From TN Senate Race To Replace Corker
Source: Associated Press
By Associated Press Published DECEMBER 14, 2017 11:31 AM
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) Democrat James Mackler says hes dropping out of the U.S. Senate race in Tennessee to replace Sen. Bob Corker, a move that appears to clear the path to the Democratic nomination for former Gov. Phil Bredesen.
Mackler said in a news release hes stepping back from the race, but will stay active with a political action committee named Believe in Service. The Nashville attorney and Iraq War veteran says the committee will support federal candidates who will protect and expand national service programs.
In a statement, Bredesen said he admires Macklers commitment to service to the nation and complimented his political action committee idea. Corker, a Republican, is retiring from the Senate.
Major Republicans in the race to succeed him are U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn and former U.S. Rep. Stephen Fincher.
###
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/democrat-james-mackler-drops-out-tennessee-senate-race
d_r
(6,907 posts)Is a night mare
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)If she is elected to the Senate, it will shake my faith in mankind.
Horrors!
Judi Lynn
(160,545 posts)A slower-witted, more obnoxious, ill-tempered Michelle Bachmann.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)expand national service programs."
I'm going to look into the Believe in Service group, especially if they support a non military component to national service.
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)... when it was started by JFK in the early 60's. Nowadays almost all of the PC recruits are recent college grads, but the original intention was to sign up retirees and older Americans for volunteer service. Still a great program too.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)equal value on non military service as it is with military service.
I've always been a big fan of the PC which gave us a lot of good politicians in the sixties and seventies. I believe that this would contribute to diminishing the empathy deficits that trouble us now in our leaders.
In fact why couldn't we have a diplomatic academy and a public service academy on a par with West Point or Annapolis?
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)would do a lot of things- one of which, give young minds a breathing space to mature a bit before making decisions (education wise) that will affect them the rest of their lives.
marble falls
(57,106 posts)out of the Navy, I was ready and as a result and unlike 60% of college graduates who work in fields outside their degrees, my career field worked well with my education.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)I was as unready to choose a major and not particularly interested in studying hard enough to get a degree in Mechanical Engineering. On scholastic probation with a new 1-A draft card I joined the USAF. There I learned to study and was given the tools to earn a very good living as an electronic technician. I never went back to university as I was now a husband and father.
lostnfound
(16,184 posts)As a woman, one thing bothers me about this. It may SEEM fair to require the same two years for men and women, but a lot of women already miss out on years of their career if they choose to become mothers. Men can do whatever they like for thirty years and easily become a dad at 50. Women may have children at 35 and find it too difficult to juggle work and kids, and ppt torment ale time off; or they miss out on promotions whether by choice or by result of less availability.
So a two year deferral for women is not equal to a two year deferral for men.
How significant? Picture a woman graduating at age 22 and scaling back for kids at age 35..thats 13 years. Getting out at age 24 cuts that down to 11 years. Thats an 18 percent reduction in career-building time. In addition, women are much more likely to end up as caregivers for their parents or sick relatives.
Not that all women become mothers and not that the service itself isnt valuable. It is.
Some service is good for everyone, but flexibility or consideration ought to be given to the inherent differences between the sexes.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)I'd like to see a diplomatic academy, or a "Foreign Service" academy. Even more importantly, I think it would be nice if voters tended to prefer candidates who had attended it. I'd like to see a political landscape where having some foreign service experience was considered a "stepping stone" for potential politicians.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)I seem to remember we did have at one time an active form of seniors working with younger people.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)He announced in April and did pretty well for a newbie to politics, but when a big figure in Tennessee politics decided to enter the arena against the Republicans...
http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2017/12/13/democrat-james-mackler-drops-out-tennessee-us-senate-race/950507001/
I know at this critical point in our history I have no interest in any Democratic Party candidates but the ones most likely to win and take control of congress away from the dark-money funders.
DoctorJoJo
(1,134 posts)... as the Repuke's candidate. This ignorant harpy is one of the worst House members ever, and would be the most beatable--a surefire Demo Senate pickup! I think even Corker might support Bredesen!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)"A slower-witted, more obnoxious, ill-tempered Michelle Bachmann." Just never seeing her in any role is obviously to be desired.