Senate Democrats to force vote on FCC net neutrality repeal
Source: Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top U.S. Senate Democrat said on Friday he would force a vote on the Federal Communications Commissions decision to repeal the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules.
The FCC voted Thursday along party lines to reverse the Obama rules barring internet service providers from blocking or throttling internet traffic, or offering paid fast lanes. A group of state attorneys general vowed to sue.
On Friday, Senator Charles Schumer of New York said he would force a vote on the FCC action under the Congressional Review Act. Republicans scuttled internet privacy rules adopted under the Obama administration using the same procedural vehicle.
There will be a vote to repeal the rule that the FCC passed. Its in our power to do that, Schumer said in New York. Sometimes we dont like them, when they used it to repeal some of the pro environmental regulations, but now we can use the CRA to our benefit and we intend to.
-snip-
#POLITICS DECEMBER 15, 2017 / 4:38 PM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
David Shepardson
3 MIN READ
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet-vote/senate-democrats-to-force-vote-on-fcc-net-neutrality-repeal-idUSKBN1E92TC
onenote
(42,704 posts)and even if gets 51 votes in the Senate, even if Paul Ryan allows it to come to a vote in the House, even if it gets a majority in the House, it could be vetoed by Trump, in which case, it would take a 2/3 vote in the House and Senate to successfully invoke the CRA.
Which is my way of suggesting that folks not get their hopes up.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,054 posts)which Eddie Munster can't randomly wave away.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-108/html/GPO-HPRACTICE-108-20.htm
However forcing it on the calendar for consideration also requires 218 signatures which obviously might not happen but it puts the issue out into the spotlight.
BumRushDaShow
(129,054 posts)Supposedly there is some bipartisan agreement about net neutrality but would it be enough to pass the resolution? And even if it passed in the Senate, it would also need to pass the House, which has more of a vote spread...
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)constituents can know how their Republican "representatives," particularly those running for reelection, voted?
BumRushDaShow
(129,054 posts)Salviati
(6,008 posts)This is what we mean when we ask you to fight! We know that you can't win them all, or even very many of them right now, but fighting for the people lets them know where you stand, and it's even better when you can get those corrupt sobs to go on the record where they stand as well.
bluestarone
(16,959 posts)we can!
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Which is a good thing. Repubs do this all the time to create votes to be used in campaign ads. Two can play that game. Hope all D and I vote for repeal. Make the R's squirm.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)mpcamb
(2,871 posts)lark
(23,102 posts)Tie this albatross firmly around their necks and let it stay until the rotten smell drives voters away. Repug voters also rely on the Internet and they will hate this as bad as we will.
Wonder if this will have an effect on the Russia bot ads?
Response to Eugene (Original post)
mpcamb This message was self-deleted by its author.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)TomSlick
(11,098 posts)I can't see the Turtle letting that come to a vote.
Wednesdays
(17,380 posts)Make McTurtle own it.
Peaceful Protester
(280 posts)TheHill (December 12, 2017 By Harper Neidig)
"It found that 83 percent overall favored keeping the FCC rules, including 75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats and 86 percent of independents."
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/364528-poll-83-percent-of-voters-support-keeping-fccs-net-neutrality-rules#bottom-story-socials
Vinca
(50,273 posts)When Gomer can't get his porn, he needs to know why.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)the average voters uses the internet to read Facebook, buy things on Amazon and watch cat videos. They'll likely never notice.
NJCher
(35,675 posts)and that is a big deal.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)Netflix adds a dollar to their monthly fee and people grumble like they do with cable bills. No big political issue.
More likely, few of the dire calamityassumptions of Net Neutrality supporters come to pass. ISPs will only charge what the market will allow them to. Like they do today.
Akoto
(4,266 posts)I agree that the internet has effectively become a public utility, like electricity and phones. Some businesses are entirely on the internet, some can only be contacted via the internet now, so on and so forth. It has replaced the library as the primary source of information on anything for the entire populace.
Net Neutrality has overwhelming support with the public. Over 80%. At worst, this goes nowhere but we get it on the record that the Republicans crashed something with that much public favor.