Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:08 PM Dec 2017

Senate Democrats to force vote on FCC net neutrality repeal

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top U.S. Senate Democrat said on Friday he would force a vote on the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to repeal the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules.

The FCC voted Thursday along party lines to reverse the Obama rules barring internet service providers from blocking or throttling internet traffic, or offering paid fast lanes. A group of state attorneys general vowed to sue.

On Friday, Senator Charles Schumer of New York said he would force a vote on the FCC action under the Congressional Review Act. Republicans scuttled internet privacy rules adopted under the Obama administration using the same procedural vehicle.

“There will be a vote to repeal the rule that the FCC passed. It’s in our power to do that,” Schumer said in New York. “Sometimes we don’t like them, when they used it to repeal some of the pro environmental regulations, but now we can use the CRA to our benefit and we intend to.”

-snip-

#POLITICS DECEMBER 15, 2017 / 4:38 PM / UPDATED 2 HOURS AGO
David Shepardson
3 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet-vote/senate-democrats-to-force-vote-on-fcc-net-neutrality-repeal-idUSKBN1E92TC

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate Democrats to force vote on FCC net neutrality repeal (Original Post) Eugene Dec 2017 OP
A vote can be forced in the Senate. But not in the House onenote Dec 2017 #1
We need them on record for 2018 SHRED Dec 2017 #7
Exactly! C Moon Dec 2017 #14
The House Dems might force the issue via a "Discharge Petition" BumRushDaShow Dec 2017 #15
Will be interesting to see how this fares. BumRushDaShow Dec 2017 #2
It'll fail. But can they force a roll call vote so that Hortensis Dec 2017 #4
That's probably why Schumer is doing it. nt BumRushDaShow Dec 2017 #5
Agreed. And for any people in the process who happen to be reading DU Salviati Dec 2017 #12
do what ever the hell bluestarone Dec 2017 #3
Putting them on the record n2doc Dec 2017 #6
Good move. SHRED Dec 2017 #8
Right, throw it in their face when elections roll around. mpcamb Dec 2017 #10
This is unpopular with just about everyone. lark Dec 2017 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author mpcamb Dec 2017 #9
They can do that? That's great! nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #11
I'm skeptical. TomSlick Dec 2017 #13
That might be the point Wednesdays Dec 2017 #20
Poll: 83% Support Net Neutrality Peaceful Protester Dec 2017 #17
Get them on the record. Vinca Dec 2017 #18
This won't be a big election issue... brooklynite Dec 2017 #19
you forget about binge watching on Netflix and Amazon NJCher Dec 2017 #21
Worst case: ISPs charge Netflix for delivery... brooklynite Dec 2017 #22
It's worth a try. The internet is integrated into every aspect of our lives now. Akoto Dec 2017 #23

onenote

(42,704 posts)
1. A vote can be forced in the Senate. But not in the House
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:17 PM
Dec 2017

and even if gets 51 votes in the Senate, even if Paul Ryan allows it to come to a vote in the House, even if it gets a majority in the House, it could be vetoed by Trump, in which case, it would take a 2/3 vote in the House and Senate to successfully invoke the CRA.

Which is my way of suggesting that folks not get their hopes up.

BumRushDaShow

(129,054 posts)
15. The House Dems might force the issue via a "Discharge Petition"
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 06:44 AM
Dec 2017

which Eddie Munster can't randomly wave away.

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-HPRACTICE-108/html/GPO-HPRACTICE-108-20.htm

However forcing it on the calendar for consideration also requires 218 signatures which obviously might not happen but it puts the issue out into the spotlight.

BumRushDaShow

(129,054 posts)
2. Will be interesting to see how this fares.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:18 PM
Dec 2017

Supposedly there is some bipartisan agreement about net neutrality but would it be enough to pass the resolution? And even if it passed in the Senate, it would also need to pass the House, which has more of a vote spread...

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
4. It'll fail. But can they force a roll call vote so that
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:23 PM
Dec 2017

constituents can know how their Republican "representatives," particularly those running for reelection, voted?

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
12. Agreed. And for any people in the process who happen to be reading DU
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:42 PM
Dec 2017

This is what we mean when we ask you to fight! We know that you can't win them all, or even very many of them right now, but fighting for the people lets them know where you stand, and it's even better when you can get those corrupt sobs to go on the record where they stand as well.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
6. Putting them on the record
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:42 PM
Dec 2017

Which is a good thing. Repubs do this all the time to create votes to be used in campaign ads. Two can play that game. Hope all D and I vote for repeal. Make the R's squirm.

lark

(23,102 posts)
16. This is unpopular with just about everyone.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 10:59 AM
Dec 2017

Tie this albatross firmly around their necks and let it stay until the rotten smell drives voters away. Repug voters also rely on the Internet and they will hate this as bad as we will.

Wonder if this will have an effect on the Russia bot ads?

Response to Eugene (Original post)

Peaceful Protester

(280 posts)
17. Poll: 83% Support Net Neutrality
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:36 PM
Dec 2017
Poll: 83 percent of voters support keeping FCC's net neutrality rules
TheHill (December 12, 2017 By Harper Neidig)

"More than 80 percent of voters oppose the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) plan to repeal its net neutrality rules, according to a new poll from the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation."

"It found that 83 percent overall favored keeping the FCC rules, including 75 percent of Republicans, 89 percent of Democrats and 86 percent of independents."

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/364528-poll-83-percent-of-voters-support-keeping-fccs-net-neutrality-rules#bottom-story-socials

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
19. This won't be a big election issue...
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 04:36 PM
Dec 2017

the average voters uses the internet to read Facebook, buy things on Amazon and watch cat videos. They'll likely never notice.

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
22. Worst case: ISPs charge Netflix for delivery...
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 09:16 PM
Dec 2017

Netflix adds a dollar to their monthly fee and people grumble like they do with cable bills. No big political issue.

More likely, few of the “dire calamity”assumptions of Net Neutrality supporters come to pass. ISPs will only charge what the market will allow them to. Like they do today.

Akoto

(4,266 posts)
23. It's worth a try. The internet is integrated into every aspect of our lives now.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 09:27 PM
Dec 2017

I agree that the internet has effectively become a public utility, like electricity and phones. Some businesses are entirely on the internet, some can only be contacted via the internet now, so on and so forth. It has replaced the library as the primary source of information on anything for the entire populace.

Net Neutrality has overwhelming support with the public. Over 80%. At worst, this goes nowhere but we get it on the record that the Republicans crashed something with that much public favor.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate Democrats to force...