Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,860 posts)
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:44 PM Dec 2017

CDC gets list of forbidden words: fetus, transgender, diversity

Source: The Washington Post

The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus” and “transgender” — in any official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden words are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”

In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases. Instead of “science-based” or ­“evidence-based,” the suggested phrase is “CDC bases its recommendations on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,” the person said. In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.

The question of how to address such issues as sexual orientation, gender identity and abortion rights — all of which received significant visibility under the Obama administration — has surfaced repeatedly in federal agencies since President Trump took office. Several key departments — including Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, as well as Justice, Education, and Housing and Urban Development — have changed some federal policies and how they collect government information about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-gets-list-of-forbidden-words-fetus-transgender-diversity/2017/12/15/f503837a-e1cf-11e7-89e8-edec16379010_story.html

89 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CDC gets list of forbidden words: fetus, transgender, diversity (Original Post) demmiblue Dec 2017 OP
OMG, this feels like the 3rd Reich more every day Ferrets are Cool Dec 2017 #1
Stalinist, I'd say--or Orwellian. nt tblue37 Dec 2017 #28
Lysenkoism, rebooted. Dave Starsky Dec 2017 #67
In the Trumpettes case, it's more like Nitwitinist. yurbud Dec 2017 #89
What about moron and idiot. Historic NY Dec 2017 #2
No, it has to have a taint of evil attached. mpcamb Dec 2017 #31
The Trumpanzees love it Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #43
Just ignore it ... what will they do, fire the entire CDC? Auggie Dec 2017 #3
They are hollowing out State as other departments and agencies, so don't assume tblue37 Dec 2017 #27
The Ministry of Truth strikes again. This administration is looking more Stalinist The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #4
Morons Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #40
I'd be tempted to write a memo about vulnerable transgender fetuses The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2017 #5
+1 Auggie Dec 2017 #9
I hope the CDC ignores this preposterous order. Ilsa Dec 2017 #6
Maybe they can substitute an operational definition for science-based? raging moderate Dec 2017 #7
"consideration of community standards and wishes?" raging moderate Dec 2017 #10
"the air and water of Planet Earth circulate all over" Couldn't we just build a wall and stop that? progree Dec 2017 #16
That phrase really bothered me too. bitterross Dec 2017 #33
It means "Bow down to christian Dominionism". . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #39
This is idiiocy Matthew28 Dec 2017 #8
1984.... bluestateboomer Dec 2017 #11
That's ridiculous. I hope everyone at the CDC gives them a big "fuck you." Vinca Dec 2017 #12
Alt CDC is resisting Sedona Dec 2017 #13
F'ing wow Beearewhyain Dec 2017 #14
The authoritarianism, it burns. This is not funny. This is what is happening in our enough Dec 2017 #15
If you're not afraid yet, you should be. chia Dec 2017 #17
Can they lawfully do this? This is absolutely ridiculous. Orwellian. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #18
George Carlin's seven dirty words have been replaced with Trump's seven dirty words. chia Dec 2017 #19
I really thought this was an Onion article when I saw the OP. damn. riversedge Dec 2017 #20
fucking Dark Ages..... dhill926 Dec 2017 #21
"Historians are gonna have a field day with this period...." Martin Eden Dec 2017 #72
totally yuiyoshida Dec 2017 #22
They want to stick their heads in the sand about real kids like this one... iluvtennis Dec 2017 #23
The child has microcephaly. LeftInTX Dec 2017 #59
Yes, that's the point - Zika is mentioned in the article muriel_volestrangler Dec 2017 #63
1984 is here! Kajun Gal Dec 2017 #24
A tweet that I just saw: demmiblue Dec 2017 #26
Wow. PatrickforO Dec 2017 #25
God this administration sucks! Initech Dec 2017 #29
Are "creationism" and "fairytale" allowed? greatauntoftriplets Dec 2017 #30
"globalism" is disallowed. Everyone must use "flat earth" now. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #36
stfu. Glimmer of Hope Dec 2017 #32
Nazis. SHRED Dec 2017 #34
Nazis? Allowed. dchill Dec 2017 #44
Double plus ungood. Double plus unwise. USA double plus far behind. Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #35
And France calling for American scientist . Yeah this country has lost it lunasun Dec 2017 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #37
Goddamn fuckers are going full on dictator lunasun Dec 2017 #38
I guess fetus is the new F-word Freethinker65 Dec 2017 #41
Nope. But trump is the new T-word. Those fascists can trump themselves when they've fucked themselv Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #45
What troubles me most is they think this is permanent bucolic_frolic Dec 2017 #46
Words are tools to think and communicate. No word? Soon concept is gone. bobbieinok Dec 2017 #47
We all need to read the sciencefiction book The Marching Morons. It's free online. bobbieinok Dec 2017 #48
Loved the book RVN VET71 Dec 2017 #51
If the Republic survives this rule by human maggots RVN VET71 Dec 2017 #49
Didn't we try this with FREEDOM FRIES? bucolic_frolic Dec 2017 #50
Why should we worry about an attack from North Korea? Girard442 Dec 2017 #52
So Doreen Dec 2017 #53
Think they Rebl2 Dec 2017 #54
This is why we have civil service protection dawg day Dec 2017 #58
They forgot "vagina". Control-Z Dec 2017 #55
And 'inbreeding' sandensea Dec 2017 #56
"in consideration with community standards and wishes" means "approved by our evangelical mullahs" PSPS Dec 2017 #57
I hope the CDC sues. LeftInTX Dec 2017 #60
Wouldn't want facts and words that express facts to offend their cherished ignorance. Solly Mack Dec 2017 #61
Even more, Mulvaney is anti-science, against govt funding for science and in charge of OMB suffragette Dec 2017 #71
And it makes me angry. Not just the stupidity of it all but that it is so clearly stupid. Solly Mack Dec 2017 #74
Yeah, it makes me angry, too. suffragette Dec 2017 #81
I think some of them are actually quite stupid. I also think all of them are primarily greedy. Solly Mack Dec 2017 #82
Very impressive for pre-coffee rant. I need a cup just to string two words together :) suffragette Dec 2017 #84
Are you OK? Solly Mack Dec 2017 #85
Yes, I am fine. Thanks for kind thoughts. I have taken that train before. Old route was scenic suffragette Dec 2017 #86
I loved the slow trains in Germany and I also loved the fast trains. I could go from Solly Mack Dec 2017 #87
Trains are my favorite way to travel. Like you, I enjoy them fast or slow. I remember sharing suffragette Dec 2017 #88
The fascists are in charge now. PragmaticDem Dec 2017 #62
OMG. When will this end? secondwind Dec 2017 #64
Repeat it everywhere bucolic_frolic Dec 2017 #65
Good thing "asshole"and "dickhead" aren't banned. Dave Starsky Dec 2017 #66
How much worse does it have to get before we purge smirkymonkey Dec 2017 #68
Fascism Out In The Open colsohlibgal Dec 2017 #69
Next on the list: Bayard Dec 2017 #70
Trumps favorite book is mein kampf. sarcasmo Dec 2017 #73
Trump wants to ban IluvPitties Dec 2017 #75
How much more of this shit are the majority of Americans going to put up with!!! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2017 #76
well... handmade34 Dec 2017 #77
well then i guess thats a list of the last names of us who comment or samnsara Dec 2017 #78
This is what happens when a six year old is in charge of the WH. democratisphere Dec 2017 #79
Looking at it a different way... grumpyduck Dec 2017 #80
Follow-up article at the WaPo: mahatmakanejeeves Dec 2017 #83

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
43. The Trumpanzees love it
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:09 PM
Dec 2017

Exactly.
Big Win.
They can’t dehumanize the baby anymore.

5 posted on 12/15/2017, 9:48:12 PM by Regulator


The Washington Post has more asian communists than the chinese politburo.

7 posted on 12/15/2017, 9:50:39 PM by SpaceBar

tblue37

(65,393 posts)
27. They are hollowing out State as other departments and agencies, so don't assume
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:48 PM
Dec 2017

they wouldn't do it.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,722 posts)
4. The Ministry of Truth strikes again. This administration is looking more Stalinist
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:48 PM
Dec 2017

every day. What the actual fuck is going on???

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,722 posts)
5. I'd be tempted to write a memo about vulnerable transgender fetuses
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:55 PM
Dec 2017

who need help from the evidence-based and science-based communities to increase the diversity of their surroundings and aid their access to entitlements.

raging moderate

(4,305 posts)
7. Maybe they can substitute an operational definition for science-based?
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 08:59 PM
Dec 2017

I bet they could say something like "based on mathematical analysis of objective observations of actual physical phenomena." I am not a scientist, so I bet actual scientists could construct much better phrases than mine. I have read that the atomic scientists who were forced to work for Adolph Hitler actually did their best to avoid constructing actual atomic bombs for him, partly by using their scientific sophistication to hide key facts in their required reports.

raging moderate

(4,305 posts)
10. "consideration of community standards and wishes?"
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:05 PM
Dec 2017

Excuse me. People at the CDC are dealing with disease and microorganisms. We'd better let them do their jobs, if we don't want the massive epidemics of the past to return. The super-rich should consider the fact that whatever goes around comes around, and the air and water of Planet Earth circulate all over.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
33. That phrase really bothered me too.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:59 PM
Dec 2017

There are a hell of a lot of things that meet "community standards" that do no merit consideration. But, that is exactly what they want to let in. They want to let in consideration of outdated beliefs and customs that actual science and logic would rule out. Female circumcision is an accepted community standard in a lot of communities still. Good science and logic put the light on such ignorant practices though.

Sedona

(3,769 posts)
13. Alt CDC is resisting
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:13 PM
Dec 2017
http://investigations.blog.ajc.com/2017/01/25/alt-cdc-twitter-account-joins-the-resistance/

"Join the Resistance.”

That’s one of the first messages on a newly created Twitter account that says it’s trying to protect the scientific integrity of the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The AltCDC account – like its counterparts set up for other federal agencies that deal with scientific matters – is a reaction to moves by the Trump administration to prevent federal scientists from sharing data with the press and the public.

Nothing on the AltCDC page identifies who is behind the account. The account profile, alongside a photo of the Greek letter omega, asks for direct messages “if you are a scientist willing to use this account to fight against political interference in science.”

The account’s ethos is represented in several hashtags: #FactsMatter, #FactsNotFear and #SolidarityinScience.

More at link

Beearewhyain

(600 posts)
14. F'ing wow
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:14 PM
Dec 2017

We have had defense of literal nazi's and now we have Orwellian New Speak. What political Rubicon will this administration not cross?

enough

(13,259 posts)
15. The authoritarianism, it burns. This is not funny. This is what is happening in our
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:14 PM
Dec 2017

beloved country.

chia

(2,244 posts)
17. If you're not afraid yet, you should be.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:20 PM
Dec 2017

"If you've ever wondered what you would have done in 1930s Germany or during the civil rights movement, congratulations:

you're doing it now."


--Matthew Miller

chia

(2,244 posts)
19. George Carlin's seven dirty words have been replaced with Trump's seven dirty words.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:25 PM
Dec 2017

smdh...

I feel like I'm living in an alternate universe.

Martin Eden

(12,870 posts)
72. "Historians are gonna have a field day with this period...."
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 02:58 PM
Dec 2017

If Trumpism isn't soundly defeated, the truth of this period will vanish down the memory hole and future historians will be propagandists.

iluvtennis

(19,861 posts)
23. They want to stick their heads in the sand about real kids like this one...
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:39 PM
Dec 2017



-----------
This kid just captured my heart - big time. I want to know her story.

LeftInTX

(25,364 posts)
59. The child has microcephaly.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:15 AM
Dec 2017

Maybe caused by Zika?

Note the name and title on the lab coat.
Nunes is a Portuguese name. The practitioner's title is obviously a Latin based title, it definitely not English.

 

Kajun Gal

(1,907 posts)
24. 1984 is here!
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:40 PM
Dec 2017

Is this "newspeak"? Goodness, can't people (Fox and Friends) see what he is doing? Oh, wait...they have never read the book by George Orwell. OK, that explains it. They just don't know literature OR history. This is too obvious, though.

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
25. Wow.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 09:42 PM
Dec 2017

“It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
― George Orwell, 1984

This is (I don't have the word). It (the word for this no longer exists). So how will we then talk about (the words are now forbidden)?

The sooner this criminal fuck and his criminal, traitorous family are out of power, the better off we will all be.

See this?

||

We are that close to dictatorship. It is a race with time, with the side of the Breakers continuing at breakneck speed while the jaws of justice tighten against them. One can readily see a parallel with the final months of the Third Reich - the Nazi destroyers kept killing people in their death camps even as their country collapsed in ruins around them.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
35. Double plus ungood. Double plus unwise. USA double plus far behind.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:00 PM
Dec 2017

If scientists are forbidden to speak the language of science, the US will continue to lose what's left of its lead in science.

Canada and Germany have re-affirmed their commitment to net neutrality.
Expect them to welcome scientists and entrepreneurs. Again.

Cape Breton beckons.

Response to demmiblue (Original post)

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
38. Goddamn fuckers are going full on dictator
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:03 PM
Dec 2017

since President Trump took office. Several key departments — including Health and Human Services, which oversees the CDC, as well as Justice, Education, and Housing and Urban Development — have changed some federal policies and how they collect government information about lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans.

Remember the trump lie - He loves teh gays

Freethinker65

(10,023 posts)
41. I guess fetus is the new F-word
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:04 PM
Dec 2017

How ridiculous.

Surprised they did not suggest replacing vagina with pussy.

bobbieinok

(12,858 posts)
47. Words are tools to think and communicate. No word? Soon concept is gone.
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:16 PM
Dec 2017

There are some very clever people working to destroy our ability to see and analyze and affect reality.

There is a significant amount of research analyzing the ways in which Naziism essentially destroyed the German language for a number of years. There were a number of topics that simply couldn't be discussed in German for a long time because the Nazis had so twisted the meaning of the words or had eliminated the words all together.

IIRC there were older German literary scholars who contended it would be a very long time before German authors of the past (such as Goethe and Schiller) could be read because of the damage done to the language.

Then add the years of damage done to the languge in East Germany. There was some contention that there were 2 different languages from 2 different histories

RVN VET71

(2,692 posts)
51. Loved the book
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:29 PM
Dec 2017

-- a less farcical look at "Things to Come" than Idiocracy, but drawing the same conclusion about our very possible future. (And I just heard George Allen, from beyond the grave, uttering his famous apothegm: The future is now.)

RVN VET71

(2,692 posts)
49. If the Republic survives this rule by human maggots
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:25 PM
Dec 2017

we'll look back on Trump with convulsive shudders every time the media show videos of him in the exercise yard at Florence Supermax where the other traitors are kept.

Still a big "if", but looking a little better since Rosenstein signaled support for (at least in saying he didn't see any reason to fire) Mueller. Mueller is the main key to survival. If he goes, so does the Republic.

Girard442

(6,075 posts)
52. Why should we worry about an attack from North Korea?
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 10:56 PM
Dec 2017

Apparently the attack has already happened, they won decisively, and we are occupied.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
55. They forgot "vagina".
Fri Dec 15, 2017, 11:39 PM
Dec 2017

I guess that one scared them so much they couldn't even broach the subject without smelling salts on hand.

PSPS

(13,600 posts)
57. "in consideration with community standards and wishes" means "approved by our evangelical mullahs"
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 12:27 AM
Dec 2017

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
71. Even more, Mulvaney is anti-science, against govt funding for science and in charge of OMB
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 02:29 PM
Dec 2017

Which is where that directive likely originated.

He has expressed doubt about Zika and funding research about it before, so it looks like he is manipulating the language CDC can even use to request budget for research.

He’s also acting director of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Bureau.

This is the stuff of nightmares.

https://www.snopes.com/trumps-budget-director-pick-asked-really-need-government-funded-research/


On 19 December 2016, Mother Jones’ Pema Levy reported on one of Mulvaney’s since-deleted Facebook posts, unearthed by a Democratic opposition research group named American Bridge. This post from 9 September 2016 came at a time that Congress was debating funding research into efforts to fight the spread of the Zika virus. In it, Mulvaney suggested the federal government (whose budget office he is now nominated to lead) might not be well served by funding science research at all:

It has been a busy week, and with everything else going on I haven’t had a chance to post on Zika, which I know has been in the news a bit. I have received all sorts of emails and FB comments this week on Zika. Some people want me to pass a “clean” bill (which I suppose means not paying for it with spending reductions elsewhere). Other folks want us to fund more research if we can find a way to pay for it. No one has written me yet, though, to ask what might be the best question: do we really need government-funded research at all.

The post, though deleted, can still be viewed on a cached version of Mulvaney’s Facebook page. His argument against science funding (and science in general) seems to follow arguments made by other prominent Trump transition team figures: because science is sometimes wrong, or not clear cut, it shouldn’t be trusted.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/judge-declines-remove-trump-pick-mulvaney-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-n824711

Solly Mack

(90,769 posts)
74. And it makes me angry. Not just the stupidity of it all but that it is so clearly stupid.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 06:45 PM
Dec 2017

If that makes sense.

Solly Mack

(90,769 posts)
82. I think some of them are actually quite stupid. I also think all of them are primarily greedy.
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 09:29 AM
Dec 2017

Facts that get in the way of greed have to go. And I can't help but think that all of them are mean and cruel.

If the ignorance of your supporters must be nurtured to gain wealth for yourself, your greed demands you stoke that ignorance.

I think it also has to do with control - ignorant people are easier to control.

If you get to make up things and label them as facts and your supporters believe them, then you control their thinking, meaning you control them. And not just your supporters - young people get caught up in this and some don't bother to find out any differently.

The GOP has shaped generations this way already.

There is no easy fix to this as this pattern has been allowed to flourish for a long time now.

The Press/Media that treats opinion as the same as fact - seldom, if ever, challenging the opinion regardless of how baseless and wrong.

Republican politicians have also pushed opinion as fact without any real challenge to what they claim as fact.

Some have opted to be what they call respectful instead of pushing back against the poorly formed, ill-informed opinion presented as fact.

Nothing respectful or nice or decorous about allowing such to happen. If it be protocol to pretend a flagrant falsehood isn't a lie, then protocol has become its own damnation.

Another example...Religious belief is not and never will be equal to scientific fact. Nor should it ever be treated that way. For any reason. It's not disrespectful to religion to recognize that it is a belief and not a fact. It is, however, not only disrespectful to all areas of democracy to pretend the two are equal, it is dangerous.

It's early and I haven't had coffee yet. lol



suffragette

(12,232 posts)
84. Very impressive for pre-coffee rant. I need a cup just to string two words together :)
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 02:09 AM
Dec 2017

Yes, this is a malignant combination of greed and viciousness, with a heavy dose of authoritarianism.

All I can think is that the cycle will change and they will be ousted from these positions of power, but damn, the damage they will do in the meantime.



Solly Mack

(90,769 posts)
85. Are you OK?
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 01:32 PM
Dec 2017

Train wreck and all.

I was mumbling about Trump while I was typing and my husband asked if I was typing what I was mumbling. I laughed and made the coffee comment. Because I wasn't typing what I was mumbling - lots of curse words.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
86. Yes, I am fine. Thanks for kind thoughts. I have taken that train before. Old route was scenic
Mon Dec 18, 2017, 02:03 PM
Dec 2017

through woods and over streams, but very, very slow. I remember the train nearing walking speed as it went through some curves.

And the Amtraks up here sometimes stop completely to allow freight trains to go by, since they seem to have priority.

Looks like they recently upgraded to what they call high speed here in the states, which would be middling speed in Europe. Now it seems that wasn’t even done properly, with deadly consequences.

There’s a strong contingent of conservatives up here, who trash any transit plans that aren’t car centered. I imagine they’ll feed off this, vultures that they are.

Entirely get the profanity. Some of my posts would be every other word if I included all the curse words I was thinking or muttering as I typed.

Solly Mack

(90,769 posts)
87. I loved the slow trains in Germany and I also loved the fast trains. I could go from
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 03:03 AM
Dec 2017

Mannheim to Paris in under 3 hours. Over 5 hours to drive, and the train time is with stops.

Rail passes were relatively inexpensive and I could go all over the continent. (just about)

I miss the strassenbahn too.

I often took the train to Frankfurt and Stuttgart.

My husband and I were talking about our mutual antipathy for Trump. We both hated Shrub - still do.

But Trump...Trump is a disease and the negative feelings for him...the aversion to him...the sheer disdain for all things Trump...it's like hating cancer, you know?

Cancer kills...Trump's ignorance and arrogance will get people killed. There's no treatment for Trump though. Not really.

I think many of us always knew of the ugly underbelly - and not not so under - that exist in America...that Trump played to and brought to the forefront so readily....and tamping it back down won't be easy.

Bush scratched at it and produced sparks - the whole of the GOP did and still does scratch at it. Trump's hate for people - and it is hate - is more naked...more open...but Trump is still everything the GOP has been working for for years...to include Bush helping it along.

His father before him played to the hate and ignorance of their voters. As did Reagan and Nixon.

And they got away with it....is it any wonder a Trump would come along?

I'll stop now.


Glad you're OK!

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
88. Trains are my favorite way to travel. Like you, I enjoy them fast or slow. I remember sharing
Tue Dec 19, 2017, 04:08 AM
Dec 2017

Lunches and chatting with fascinating people on my train trips in Europe. And you get such a lovely sense of the area when you go through it by train.

This is a tragedy, but I hope train travel here continues to develop more.

We have started getting streetcars and link rail here. Makes for a calming inexpensive trip to the airport, with a fantastic view of Mount Rainier thrown in if the day is clear.

Still not extensive like the ones in Germany or Zurich, but a good start. Restart, actually, since you can still see the old track of some of the ones that were torn out to make way for cars.

Total aside, I remember when I lived in California and thee film, Roger Rabbit had come out. A local PBS station down there ran a documentary about the many streetcars LA used to have and how gas companies schemed to have them removed. Gave a real twist to watching Roger Rabbit. There was a core of truth at the center of the plot under the zaniness.

I agree with all you say about Bush and Trump and Reagan and Nixon. Some days I have difficulty even talking about it. I get so angry. I rewatched All the President’s Men the other day and it was both infuriating and cathartic. Though lately, it feels we are more stuck in the most bizarre of the Black Mirror episodes.

bucolic_frolic

(43,173 posts)
65. Repeat it everywhere
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 08:13 AM
Dec 2017

“vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
66. Good thing "asshole"and "dickhead" aren't banned.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 09:41 AM
Dec 2017

Nor are about fifty other words I would "liberally" use in my reports back to the White House.

colsohlibgal

(5,275 posts)
69. Fascism Out In The Open
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 11:42 AM
Dec 2017

As others noted, this is straight out of Orwell’s “1984”. How dare they, may they rot in Hell if there is a Hell.

Hopefully the decent people will show up to vote in 2018/2020.....if we are still allowed to and if the vote is on the up and up.

Bayard

(22,077 posts)
70. Next on the list:
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 01:04 PM
Dec 2017

The word, "Democratic".

So basically, they're saying a totally scientific organization cannot use scientific words.

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
77. well...
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 06:55 PM
Dec 2017

just left a position working on CDC health study... I know some of those CDC people and they are not happy

samnsara

(17,622 posts)
78. well then i guess thats a list of the last names of us who comment or
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 06:59 PM
Dec 2017

ask questions. Donna Diversity- Frank Fetus- T. R. Ansgender

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
79. This is what happens when a six year old is in charge of the WH.
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 07:14 PM
Dec 2017

Where the hell are the adults? Does the f'ing GOP have any GD respondsible adults?

grumpyduck

(6,240 posts)
80. Looking at it a different way...
Sat Dec 16, 2017, 07:34 PM
Dec 2017

My initial reaction agrees with most of the above, but then I saw the other side of it. Bear with me.

The seven words are blocked specifically in budget documents and requests. Now, we know who is going to review those documents, right? Members of Congress. We also know that members of Congress just love to sidetrack conversations by grabbing on to a term or word and going off on long debates about its meaning; it's an old trick to disorient people. Heck, trial lawyers do the same thing.

For instance, the term "fetus." A lawmaker can hijack the discussion by going off on requesting a definition of the word, and then debating it, instead of talking about the subject matter. And they love to do this.

So, my suggestion to CDC was (I wrote them a note this morning) to look at the bright side: find someone (or several someones) who can translate budget documents into fourth-grade English and submit them that way. Take away the opportunity to hijack the discussion by going off on tangents.

Now, do I believe for one second that CDC will discuss this idea internally even for a moment? Heck no.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,472 posts)
83. Follow-up article at the WaPo:
Sun Dec 17, 2017, 04:26 PM
Dec 2017

Retweeted by David Fahrenthold: https://twitter.com/Fahrenthold

NEW: It's not just at CDC. Certain words are banned at at multiple HHS agencies. Words include ‘diversity’ and ‘vulnerable.’ Also, at the State Department now, certain documents refer to sex education as “sexual risk avoidance.” My story with @eilperin.



Health & Science

Words banned at multiple HHS agencies include ‘diversity’ and ‘vulnerable’

By Lena H. Sun and Juliet Eilperin December 16 at 7:00 PM

The Trump administration has informed multiple divisions within the Department of Health and Human Services that they should avoid using certain words or phrases in official documents being drafted for next year’s budget.
....

At the State Department, meanwhile, certain documents now refer to sex education as “sexual risk avoidance.” .... Rush Holt, chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, said: “Among the words forbidden to be used in CDC budget documents are ‘evidence-based’ and ‘science-based.’ I suppose one must not think those things either. Here’s a word that’s still allowed: ridiculous.”
....

At the State Department, for example, employees received a guidance document on Wednesday that outlined how they should develop country operating plans under the President’s Plan for Emergency AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) for 2018. This document repeatedly uses the phrase “sexual risk avoidance,” which has been defined in recent congressional funding bills as abstinence-only practices until marriage, as the primary form of sex education.
....

The same guidance document includes a line touting the efficacy of abstinence-only programs, referring to “abstinence as a highly effective form of prevention.” ... Several public health experts questioned that assertion, noting that multiple studies have shown that there is little evidence this form of education either delays sexual activity or reduces the number of sexual partners a person has. A nine-year congressionally mandated study concluded in 2007 that teenagers enrolled in abstinence-only programs were no more likely to refrain from having sex than those who did not enroll. Among those who did have sex, the study found, there was no difference in when they began to engage in this activity or how many partners teens in each group had.
....

Lena H. Sun is a national reporter for The Washington Post, focusing on health.
Follow @bylenasun

Juliet Eilperin is The Washington Post's senior national affairs correspondent, covering how the new administration is transforming a range of U.S. policies and the federal government itself. She is the author of two books—one on sharks, and another on Congress, not to be confused with each other—and has worked for the Post since 1998.
Follow @eilperin
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CDC gets list of forbidde...