he is protesting a wee bit too much... hard to tell though, given what a whiney little bitch he is usually.

Way too much. I would think he is just encouraging the FBI that much more to prove the dossier is real. I can't imagine how stupid you'd have to be to provoke the FBI.

And the list goes on and on. He's a stupid little man, a total loser.

He is using tactics that worked on little people, with no power and few resources, but will only inspire these investigative agencies to pursue him and use every tool they have to bring him down. I am sure that every snarky remark and tweet only fuels their resolve and motivates them to work harder. What a total dumb ass!

through him and his childlike behavior.

At some point in the very near future, someone in Congress is going to demand they give up the goods on it.

It might be better if Trump didn't realize how much they've uncovered, but I suppose it puts pressure on others from the campaign and administration to be more forthcoming out of self-preservation.

I am sure true professionals will do what must be done with or without Trump's attacks, but his childish tantrums and put downs must energize them to uncover the truth.

It must be true... just my take..
m

Manafort? Flynn? Those “Russian adoption” meetings, then you claiming to know damning info about Hillary was coming within days? Your public pleas to Russia to help you? Your friend Mr. Assange? Roger Stone’s time in the barrel comment? Guiliani’s comment about having inside FBI info?

Its the only way HIS propaganda will work. Then criminalize his opposition, like Putin does.

And, as CIA veteran John Sipher recently argued, several months of revelations have confirmed a number of Steele’s findings.

[link:http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/the-republican-plan-to-use-the-steele-dossier-against-comey.html …|]

Trump doesn't dare criticize Putin or he will be brought down. Virtually every criticism of Russia by his own cabinet has been contradicted by Trump. Why? The logical answer is they have extremely compromising information on the Sexual Predator and Chief. I would be willing to bet that eventually the information will be released. But only when it is to Russia's advantage. Therefore it may be years before the truth is fully known.

It's apropos that Clinton, having been Secretary of State and privy to classified intel, would have the DNC kickstart compiling of info/reports on foreign cyberspying and election interference, since she was best positioned to know of reports from the 16 agencies that it had been going on for some time.

Beyond that, so what if the DNC paid for oppo research. ANYone with classified intelligence access could have kickstarted investigations of foreign cyberspying, which then would lead to evidence of aiding and abetting foreign activities endangering the interests of the U.S, corroborated by the 16 agencies, who would then have turned the info over to the FBI, who'd then determine its actionable legal scrutiny.

Bring on the pee tapes!

Mr. Mueller is working up a nice surprise for you.

Don't despair.

He's got the proof you're looking for.

My OP from:
THREAD regarding: FBI used the Steele dossier to get FISAs

Link to tweet

3. (It's worth noting in that previous article that Steele apparently believed that there was a cabal in the FBI *preventing* the dossier from reaching the top, and it also suggests that he contacted @DavidCornDC about its contents. But I'll let reporters sort out those details.)

Link to tweet

6. The DOJ lawyers who help prepare the FISA applications take this VERY seriously. Like, even if you had a common-knowledge assertion, like "Country X is a state-sponsor of terrorism," they make you include a cite (preferably two) supporting it. They want every fact airtight.

7. The Steele dossier is "raw intelligence." It contains reporting from third party sources -- meaning it is basically hearsay. So the FBI can't just staple the dossier to a cover sheet that says "GIVE ME A FISA" and be done with it.

8. To use any or all of the dossier, the FBI would have to provide independent verification and corroboration of each fact that would be included in the application. This could mean first-hand witness statements, actual recordings from electronic surveillance, etc.

9. In other words, if the FBI *did* use the contents of the dossier to obtain a FISA, then by definition those contents are true, corroborated, and independently verifiable. Remember that the application is presented to an Article III judge -- a judicial check -- before granted.

10. This does not seem like the road Trump supporters want to be going down...and yet they are. It's so bizarre. And to underscore: To claim that this was a huge conspiracy is ALSO directly implicating members of the judiciary (who could be Republican appointees) without basis.

P.S. In tweet #2 *he* refers to Steele -- I was cutting down this sentence to fit and omitted him as the original referent

Link to tweet

They didn't have to verify anything. You did it for them, you stupid pompous a$$.

I thought he was playing golf today. Do they keep him constantly updated on what they're saying on Fox?

Trump et all are working this hard to discredit Steele's info, then it must be true or very close to it.

It must be total poison to him. The dossier is what he fears will take him down.