Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,692 posts)
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 05:31 PM Jan 2018

Nebraska becomes first red state to introduce pro-net neutrality legislation

Source: The Hill

Nebraska is now the first Republican-controlled state to launch its own attempt to save net neutrality rules.

On Friday, state Sen. Adam Morfeld (D) introduced legislation in the state legislature to enshrine net neutrality regulations in law on the state level.

Morfeld’s bill would keep broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast from slowing down or blocking internet content and from cutting deals with content companies to give them faster connection speeds.

It’s unclear how likely that the bill is to pass in Nebraska, but Morfeld told The Lincoln Star Journal that it has already received bipartisan support from other state lawmakers.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/technology/367973-nebraska-becomes-first-republican-state-to-introduce-pro-net-neutrality

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nebraska becomes first red state to introduce pro-net neutrality legislation (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2018 OP
Isn't there a provision in paishit's repeal not fooled Jan 2018 #1
A state by state method of regulation would be a total mess.... needs to be at Federal level groundloop Jan 2018 #2
Yes, which is why once California and New York did it not fooled Jan 2018 #3
The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. djg21 Jan 2018 #4

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
1. Isn't there a provision in paishit's repeal
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 07:58 PM
Jan 2018

to preempt state attempts to mandate net neutrality? I think the FCC did this, which would mean states can't have their own laws requiring carriers to retain neutrality.

pukes. State's Rights my ass.


not fooled

(5,801 posts)
3. Yes, which is why once California and New York did it
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 09:05 PM
Jan 2018

i.e., passed net neutrality laws, the big carriers would have been forced to follow suit in the other states. That's what paishit sought to avoid.

 

djg21

(1,803 posts)
4. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.
Mon Jan 8, 2018, 10:15 PM
Jan 2018

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

If the Federal Government, acting through the Congress, intended to fully occupy a given field, or if the state law contradicts the federal law, it is impliedly preempted.

A Federal Law also can expressly preempt a state law.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nebraska becomes first re...