FBI Says Evidence Missing in Congress' Probe on How Feds Handled Clinton Email Investigation, Report
Last edited Sun Jan 21, 2018, 05:42 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Law & Crime
by Alberto Luperon | 3:16 pm, January 21st, 2018
The FBI claimed that Congress is missing evidence in a probe over how the feds handled the Hillary Clinton email investigation, said reporter Sharyl Attkisson on Sunday.
Link to tweet
The House Oversight Committee and House Judiciary Committee are running inquiries. Neither they nor the FBI immediately responded to a Law&Crime request for comment on Sunday.
The Clinton email scandal might seem like it happened a long time ago, but Congress still has their eye on it. The Republican-led committees announced their probe last October.
Link to tweet
###
Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/politics/fbi-says-evidence-missing-in-congress-probe-on-how-feds-handled-clinton-email-investigation-report-says/
UPDATE:
FBI did not save officials texts during key period in Trump probe, senator says
By Devlin Barrett January 21 at 1:59 PM
The FBI did not retain text messages exchanged by two senior officials involved in the probes of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump for a five-month period ending the day a special counsel was appointed to investigate possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to a new congressional letter.
The letter from Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, to FBI Director Christopher A. Wray indicates the Justice Department has turned over to lawmakers a new batch of texts from senior FBI agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page. The messages have not been made public.
As The Washington Post reported in December, Strzok was removed from the Trump probe after internal investigators discovered he and Page, who were romantically involved , exchanged anti-Trump, pro-Clinton texts during investigations of both presidential candidates. Later that month, the Justice Department provided Congress with hundreds of pages of messages. Republicans said the texts revealed political bias at the bureaus highest levels.
Johnsons weekend letter said his committee received 384 pages of new Strzok-Page texts late Friday. The lawmaker is asking the FBI to explain in more detail why it did not preserve text messages between Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok between approximately December 14, 2016 and May 17, 2017.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-did-not-save-officials-texts-during-key-period-in-clinton-trump-probes-senator-says/2018/01/21/c621c418-fed0-11e7-8acf-ad2991367d9d_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.0912817ad450
lapucelle
(18,319 posts)dsc
(52,166 posts)Lost and gone forever? the fbi didn't send it but has their own copies? the fbi sent it, has their own copies, but Congress now doesn't? This story did a piss poor job of explaining that.
djacq
(1,634 posts)Archae
(46,345 posts)Anti-vaxxer, and Obama-hating demagogue.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)"secret memo" written by aides, which they are using against the FBI and Adam Schiff has said is not complete
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
.99center This message was self-deleted by its author.
bucolic_frolic
(43,287 posts)This is just an inverse form of whining.
Surprised they're not claiming the Senate budget vote was miscounted.
Ramsey Barner
(349 posts)Last sentence of the statement:
"Congress has a constitutional duty to preserve the integrity of our judicial branch...."
I guess Goodlatte used his Judiciary Committee template and Gowdy didn't read it all the way through. Or anyone on either of their staffs.
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)Response to Ramsey Barner (Reply #8)
plantwomyn This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)Abouttime
(675 posts)Sorry, evidence is missing. Just go home. We should do this more often. F-you repuke muckrakers.